Skip to main content

Valuation of a Credit Default Swap: The Stable Non-Gaussian versus the Gaussian Approach

  • Conference paper
Credit Risk

Summary

This empirical paper investigates the effect of different distributional assumptions governing defaultable bond price uncertainty on the price of a credit default swap. We value a credit default swap using the two-factor Hull-White (1994) model for the term structure of default-free Spot interest rates and the credit spread process of a Baa-rated bond index and use the fractional recovery model of Duffie-Singleton (1999) and its multiple default extension as given in Schönbucher (1996,1998). The model is implemented using a tree algorithm outlined in Schönbucher (1999) where one factor is used for the spot interest rate and the other factor is for the credit spread or the intensity rate of a Cox process. This tree representation permits correlation between the spot rate and the credit spread dynamics of the Baa bond index, enabling us to provide a model that better fits the term structure of default-free and defaultable bond prices. We compare the values of a credit default swap obtained when the underlying risk factors are modeled with Gaussian and stable non-Gaussian distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, E.I. (1983/1990). Corporate Financial Distress. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altman, E.I., Brady, B., Resti, A., Sironi, A. (2002). The link between default and recovery rates: Implications for credit risk models and procylicality.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anson, M.J.P. (1999). Credit Derivatives. Frank J. Fabozzi Associates, New Hope, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  4. Artzner, P., and Delbaen, F. (1992). Credit risk and prepayment option. 22:81-96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bakshi, G., Madan, D., Zhang, F. (2001). Recovery in default risk modeling: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. University of Maryland and the Federal Reserve Board.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black, F., and Cox., J. (1976). Valuing corporate securities: Some effects of bond indenture provisions. Journal of Finance, 351-367.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Black, F., and Scholes, M. (1973).The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81 : 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bremaud, Pierre. (1981). Point Processes and Queues. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clewlow, L., Strickland, Chris. (1998). Implementing Derivatives Models. Wiley Series in Financial Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Das, S.R. (1995). Credit risk derivatives. Journal of Derivatives, 2(3):7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duffie, D. (1998). Defaultable term structure models with fractional recovery of par. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duffie, D. (1994). Forward rate curves with default risk. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duffie, D. (1999). Credit swap valuation. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duffie, D., and Huang, M. (1996).Swap rates and credit quality. Journal of Finance, 51:921–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duffie, D., Schröder, M., and Skiadas, C. (1996). Recursive valuation of defaultable securities and the Urning of resolution of uncertainty. Annais of Probability 6, 1075–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duffie, D., and Singleton. K. (1997). An econometric model ofthe term structure of interest rate swap yields. Journal of Finance, 52(4):1287–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duffie, D., and K. Singleton. (1999). Modeling term structures of defaultable bonds. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(4):687–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Flesaker, B., Houghston, L., Schreiber, L., and Sprung, L. Taking all the credit. Risk Magazine, 7:105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fons, J.S. (1994).Using default rates to model the term structures of defaultable bonds. Financial Analysts Journal, September-October, 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  21. Franks, J.R. and Torous, W.N. (1994). A comparison of financial re-contracting in distressed exchanges and Chapter 11 reorganizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 35 349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Geske, R. The valuation of corporate liabilities as Compound options.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gupton, G.M. and Stein, R.M. (2002). LossCalc™ Moody’s Model for predicting loss given default (LGD), Global Credit Research, Moody’s Investor Services.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Heath, D., Jarrow, R., and Morton, A. (1992 ) Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica, 60:77–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hull, J.C. (2000). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives. Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hull, J. and A. White. (1990).Pricing Interest-Rate-Derivative Securities. Review of Financial Studies, 3, 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hull, J. and A. White. (1994a). Numerical procedures for implementing term structure models I: Single-Factor models. Journal of Derivatives, 2, 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hull, J. and A. White. (1994b). Numerical procedures for implementing term structure models II: Two-Factor models. Journal of Derivatives, 2, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jarrow, R.A., Lando, D., and Turnbull, S.M. (1993, revised 1994). A Markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads. Working paper, Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jarrow, R.A., and Stuart M. Turnbull. (1995).Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk. Journal of Finance, 50, 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jarrow, R.A. and Turnbull, S.M. (2000).The intersection of market and credit risk. Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jarrow, R.A. and Yildirim, Y. (2002). Valuing default swaps under market and credit risk correlation. The Journal of Fixed Income, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lando, D. (1994). Three essays on contingent claims pricing. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate School of Management, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lando, D. (1998). On Cox processes and credit risky securities. Review of Derivatives Research, 2, (2/3) 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Longstaff, F.A., and Schwartz, E. (June 1995). The pricing of credit derivatives. Journal of Fixed Income, 5(1):6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Madan, D and H. Unal. (1998).Pricing the risks of default. Review of Derivatives Research, 2 (2/3) 121–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mandelbrot, B.B., (1963). The Variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business 26, 394–419.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mandelbrot, B.B., (1967).The Variation of some other speculative prices. Journal of Business 40, 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maxtin, B., Rachev, S.T., Schwartz, E.S. (2000). Stable non-Gaussian models for credit risk management. Working paper, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Merton, R.C.(1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance, 29:449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mittnik, S., Rachev, S.T., Doganoglu, T. and Chenyao, D. (1996) Maximum likelihood estimation of stable Paretian models. Working paper, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mittnik, S., Rachev, S.T., (2000). Diagnosing and treating the fat tails in financial returns data. Journal of Empirical Finance 7, 389–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Paulauskas, V. and Rachev, S.T. (1999 ). Maximum likelihood estimators in regression models with infinite variance innovation. Working paper, Vilnius University, Lithuania

    Google Scholar 

  44. Prigent, J.L., Renault, O., Scaillet, O. (2001). An empirical investigation in credit spread indices

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rachev, S.T., (1991). Probability Metrics and the Stability of Stochastic Models. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rachev, S.T., Mittnik, S. (2000). Stable Paretian Models in Finance. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rachev, S.T., Racheva-Jotova, B., Hristov, B., I. Mandev (1999). Software Package for Market Risk (VaR) Modeling for Stable Distributed Financial Distributed Returns Mercury 1.0 Documentation.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rachev, S.T., Schwartz, E., Khindanova, I., (2000). Stable modeling of credit risk. Working paper UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rachev, S.T., Tokat, Y. (2000) Asset and liability management: recent advances. CRC Handbook on Analytic Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Samorodnitsky, G., Taqqu, M.S. (1994). Stable Non-Gaussian Random Variables. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schönbucher, P. (August 1996). The term structure of defaultable bond prices. Discussion Paper B-384, University of Bonn, SFB 303.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schönbucher, P. (1998). Term structure modelling of defaultable bonds. Discussion Paper B-384, University of Bonn, SFB 303. Review of Derivatives Studies, special Issue : Credit Risk 2 (2/3), 161-192.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schönbucher, P. (1999). Credit Risk Modelling and Credit Derivatives. Ph.D.-.thesis, Faculty of Economics, Bonn University.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schönbucher, P. (June 1999). A tree implementation of a credit spread model for credit derivatives. Department of Statistics, Bonn University.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tavakoli, Janet M. (1998). Credit Derivatives: A guide to instruments and applications. John Wiley Sz Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tokat, Y., Rachev, S.T., Schwartz, E.S. (2001). Asset Liability Management: A review and some new results in the presence of heavy tails. Ziemba, W.T. (Ed)Handbook of Heavy Tailed Distributions in Finance, Handbook of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilson, T. (1997a). Portfolio credit risk (1). Risk 10 (9) 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wilson, T. (1997b).Portfolio credit risk (2). Risk 10 (10) 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

D’Souza, D., Amir-Atefi, K., Racheva-Jotova, B. (2003). Valuation of a Credit Default Swap: The Stable Non-Gaussian versus the Gaussian Approach. In: Bol, G., Nakhaeizadeh, G., Rachev, S.T., Ridder, T., Vollmer, KH. (eds) Credit Risk. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59365-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59365-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0054-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59365-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics