New Materials for Mobile Bearing Knee Prosthesis — Titanium Nitride Counterface Coatings for Reduction of Polyethylene Wear

  • V. C. Jones
  • D. D. Auger
  • M. H. Stone
  • J. Fisher


Wear of polyethylene is widely recognized as a cause of osteolysis and failure in artificial hip joints [2]. Recent studies of tissues surrounding knee prosthesis [1] have shown the accumulation of micron and sub micron size polyethylene wear debris, at similar levels to that found in the hip, hence indicating the potential for longer term osteolysis. In the hip damage or scratching to the femoral counterface has been shown to accelerate polyethylene wear [6] and it is now recommended to use alumina ceramic femoral heads, which arc more damage resistant and can deliver lower long term wear rates [5]. Similar damage has been found in knees [4]. The complexity of the femoral and tibial tray geometries in the knee do not readily lend themselves for replacement of the metallic bearing counterfaces with monolithic ceramic- materials. An alternative approach is to modify the polished metallic bearing surface with hard smooth ‘ceramic like’ coatings.


Wear Rate Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Titanium Nitride Knee Prosthesis Polyethylene Wear 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Howling GI, Barnett PI, Tipper JL, Stone MH, Fisher J, Ingham E (2001) Quantitative characterization of polyethylene debris isolated from periprosthetic tissue in early failure knee implants and early and late failure Charnley hip implants. J Biomed Mater Res 58: 415–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ingham E, Fisher J (1999) Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 214 H: 21–37Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones VC, Barton DC, FitzPatrick DP, Auger DD, Stone MH, Fisher J (1999) An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: The influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng 9: 189–196Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones VC, Williams IR, Auger DD, Walsh W, Barton DC, Stone MH, Fisher J (2001) Quantification of third body damage to the tibial counterface in mobile bearing knees. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 215 H: 171–179Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Minakawa H, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM, Lancaster JG, Ingham E, Fisher J (1998) Quantification of third-body damage and its effect on UHMWPE wear with different types of femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 80-B: 894–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tipper JL, Ingham E, Hailey JL, Besong AA, Fisher J, Wroblewski BM, Stone MH (2000) Quantitative analysis of polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retrieved Charnley hip prostheses. Materials Science, Materials in Medicine 11: 117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. C. Jones
  • D. D. Auger
  • M. H. Stone
  • J. Fisher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations