Advertisement

Indications

  • P. A. Keblish
  • J. L. Briard
  • K. J. Hamelynck
  • W. Mueller
  • N. F. Friederich
  • B. Sorrells
  • D. E. Beverland

Abstract

The concept of unicondylar resurfacing was developed by McKeever and Elliot [27] in the 1950s and utilized through the 1960s. Cemented hemiarthroplasty (femoral and tibial surfaces) was first reported in the early 1970s in North America by Gunston. Marmor [25] utilizing the fixed-bearing knee with different geometry (Fig. 1).

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component Tibial Component High Tibial Osteotomy Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (1989) New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop Clin North Am 20: 147–177Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompart-mental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow- up period. J Arthroplasty 11: 782–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen M, Buechel F, Pappas MJ (1991) Meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. An 11-year clinical study. Orthop Rev 20: 443–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coventry MB (1987) Proximal tibial varus osteotomy lor osteoarthritis of the lateral compartment of the knee.) Bone Joint Surg [Am) 69A: 32–38.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks ML (1997) A midvastus muscle- splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthro-plasty 12: 322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1982) The Oxford knee: A clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 64–B: 620Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grelsamer RP,Cartier P (1992) A unicompartmental knee replacement is not «half a total knee»: Five major differ-ences. Orthop Rev 21: 1350–1356Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A et al. (1993) Unicompart-mental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 286: 154–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hodge WA, Chandler HP (1992) Unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of constrained and uncon-strained designs. JBJS [Am] 74: 877–883Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Insall J, Aglietti P (1980) A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. JBJS [Am] 62-A: 1329–1337Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Insall J, Walker P (1976) Unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop 120: 83–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Insall JN, Scott WN, Keblish PA et al. (1994) Total knee arthroplasty exposures and soft tissue balancing. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds), VideoBook of Knee Surgery. Lippin-cott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keblish PA (1994) The case for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 17: 853–855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keblish PA Jr (1998) Surgical techniques in the perfor-mance of unicompartmental arthroplasties. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics 8: 134–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keblish PA (2002) Surgical approaches: lateral approach. In: Scuderi GR, Tria JA (eds) Surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knight JL, Atwater RD, Guo J. Larly failure of the porous coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee ar-throplasty. Aids to diagnosis and revision. J Arthoplasty 1997; 12: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kozinn SC, Marx C, Scott RD (1989) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A 4.5-6-year follow-up study with a metal-backed tibial component. J Arthroplasty 4 (Suppl): S1–S10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laskin RS (1976) Modular total knee-replacement arthro-plasty. A review of eighty-nine patients. JBJS 58: 766–773Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levine WN, Ozuna RM, Scott RD et al. (1996) Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11: 797–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewold S, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1993) Reduced failure rate in knee prosthetic surgery with improved implanta¬tion technique. Clin Orthop 287: 94–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A, Lewold S (1992) Multicenter study of unicompartment knee revision. PCA, Marmor, and St. Georg compared in 3,777 cases of arthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 63: 256–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lindstrand A,Stenstrom A,Ryd L.Toksvig-Larsen S (2000) The introduction period of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is critical: a clinical multicentered and radioste- reometric study of 251 Duracon unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, j Arthroplasty 15: 608–616Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A (1992) Polyethylene wear of the PCA unicompartmental knee. Prospective 5 (4–8) year study of 120 arthrosis knees. Acta Orthop Scand 63: 260–262Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marmor L (1990) Patient selection for osteotomy, unicom-partmental replacement, and total knee replacement. Am J Knee Surg 3: 206 - 213Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marmor L (1988) Unicompartment arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. Clin Or¬thop 228: 171 - 177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matthews LS, Goldstein SA, Malvitz TA, Katz BP (1988) Proximal tibial osteotomy. Factors that influence the dura-tion of satisfactory function. Clin Orthop 229: 193-200Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McKeever DC, Elliot RB (1960) Tibial plateau prosthesis. Clin Orthop 18: 86 - 95Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (1999) Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompart- mental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricom- partmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 pri¬mary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 70: 170 - 175Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Romanowski MR, Repicci JA (2002) Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 15: 17 - 22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, Thornhill TS (1991) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 12-year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop 271: 96–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stulberg SD (1990) Unicompartmental knee replacement. TechOrtho 5: 1–74Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Swank M, Stulberg SD, Jiganti J et al. (1993) The natural history of unicompartmental arthroplasty. An eight-year follow-up study with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop 286: 130–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Dalen J, Krause BL (1991) Medial unicompartment knee replacement. Minimum five year follow-up. Aust NZJ Surg 61: 497–500Google Scholar
  34. 1.
    Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW (1982) The influence of total knee replacements design on walking and stair climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64: 1328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 2.
    Barrett DS, Cobb AG, Bentley G (1991) Joint proprioception in normal, osteoarthritic and replaced knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73: 53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 3.
    Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Minns RJ et al. (1997) Wear in retrieved condylar arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 12: 281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 4.
    Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A (1999) Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81: 697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 5.
    Fuchs S, Thorwesten L, Niewerth S (1999) Proprioceptive function in knees with and without total knee arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil: 78: 39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 6.
    Goodfellow JB, O’Connor JJ (1988) Retention of the anterior cruciate in arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70: 333Google Scholar
  40. 7.
    Greenwald AS (1989) Stability characteristics of total knee replacements. AAOS 36th Annual Meeting ( Scientific Exhibit) in Las Vegas, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  41. 8.
    Grood ES, Noyes FR, Butler DL, Suntay WJ (1981) Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63: 1257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 9.
    Koralewicz LM, Engh GA (2000) Comparison of proprioception in arthritic and age-matched normal knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82: 1582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 10.
    Mahoney OM, Noble PC, Rhoads DD, Alexander JW.Tullos HS (1994) Posterior cruciate function following total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty 9: 569Google Scholar
  44. 11.
    Mueller W (1982) Das Knie. Form, Funktion und liga-mentäre Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. 12.
    Nelissen RG, Hogendoom PC (2001) Retain or sacrifice the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty, a histopathological study of the cruciate ligament in osteoarthritic and rheumatic disease. J Clin Pathol 54: 381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 13.
    Pap G, Meyer M, Weiler HT, Machner A, Awiszus F (2000) Proprioception after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison with clinical outcome. Acta Orthop Scand 71: 153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 14.
    Pritchett JW (1996) Anterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11: 194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 15.
    Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA et al. (1995) Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-re- taining knee arthroplasty. I Bone Joint Surg Br 77: 884Google Scholar
  49. 16.
    Viidik A (1980) The mechanical properties of parallel fi- bered collagenous tissue. In: Viidik A, Vuust J (eds) Biology of collagen. Academic Press, London, pp 237–255Google Scholar
  50. 1.
    Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RVV (1982) The influence of total knee replacement design on walking and stair climb¬ing. I Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64 A: 1328–1335Google Scholar
  51. 2.
    Barrett I)S,Cobb AG, Bentley G (1991) [oint proprioception in normal, osteoarthritic and replaced knees. I Bone Joint Surg Br 73: 53Google Scholar
  52. 3.
    Caton J,Boulahia A,Patricot LM (1998/1999) Natural history of the posterior cruciate ligament in osteoarthritis, Communication ESSKA Nice 1998 and SI COT, Sidney 1999Google Scholar
  53. 4.
    Chatain F. Influence du positionnement de l’interligne articulaire sur la cinématique du genou prothèse et sur le comportement des ligaments collatéraux. 9es Journées Lyonnaises de chirurgie du genou La chirurgie prothétique du genou (Chambat, Neyret, Deschamps) Ed. Sauramps médical Montpellier France,Google Scholar
  54. 5.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, Cheal EJ, Stiehl JB (2001) Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 83B: 33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 6.
    Emodi GJ, Callaghan J J, Pedersen DR, Brown TD (1999) Posterior cruciate ligament function following total knee arthroplasty. The effect of joint line elevation. Jowa Orthop J 19: 82–92Google Scholar
  56. 7.
    Franchi A, Maccherotti G, Aglietti P (1995) Neural system of the human PCL in osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 10: 679–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 8.
    Friederich N et al. (1992) Klinische Anwendung bio- mechanischer und funktionell anatomischer Daten am Kniegelenk. Orthopäde 21: 41–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 9.
    Goutallier D, Allain J,Le Monel S, Voisin MC (1998) Evalua-tion de l’état histologique du ligament croisé postérieur en fonction de l’état macroscopique du ligament croisé anté-rieur. Intérêt pour l’indication des prothèses conservants le où les ligaments croisés. Communication à la 73 me réunion de la SOFCOT, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. 10.
    Gunston FH (1971) Polycentric knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 53-B(2): 272–277Google Scholar
  60. 11.
    Lewandowsky PJ, Askew MJ, Lin DF, Hurst FW, Melby A (1997) Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament retaining and sacrificing mobile bearing total knee arthroplasties. An in vitro comparison of the New Jersey LCS meniscal bearing and rotation platform prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 12 (7): 777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 12.
    Mahonney OM, Noble PC, Rhoads DD, Alexander JW, Tullos HS (1994) Posterior cruciate function following total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study J Arthroplasty 9 (6): 569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 13.
    Montgomery RL, Goodman SB, Csongradi J (1993) Late rupture of posterior cruciate ligament after total knee re-placement. Jowa Orthop J 13: 167–170Google Scholar
  63. 14.
    Pereira DS, Jaffe FF, Ortiguera C (1998) Posterior cruciate ligament - sparing versus posterior cruciate ligament sacrificing arthroplasty. Functional results using the same prosthesis J Arthroplasty 13 (2): 138–144Google Scholar
  64. 15.
    Race A, Amis A A (1996) Loading of the two bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an analysis of bundle function in A-P drawer. J Biomechanics 29 (7): 873–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 16.
    Shiers LGP, Exerpta medica (1954) Arthroplasty of the knee Preliminary report of a new method. J Bone Joint Surg 36-B: 553Google Scholar
  66. 17.
    Sorger JI, Federle D, Kirk PG, Grood E, Cochran J, Levy M (1997) The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee ar-throplasty. J Arthroplasty 12 (8): 869–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 18.
    Takatsu J, Itokazu M, Shimizu K, Brown TD (1998) The function of posterior tilt of the tibial component following posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 57 (4): 195–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 19.
    Walldius B (1957) Arthroplasty of the knee using endoprosthesis Acta Orthop Scand 23 (Suppl): 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 20.
    Waslewski GL, Marson BM, Benjamin JB (1998) Early, incapacitating instability of posterior cruciate ligament - retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13 (7): 763–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 21.
    Yasuda K, Sasaki T (1986) Stress analysis after total knee arthroplasty with posterior cruciate ligament resection type and retention type prosthesis with special reference to the significance of retaining the posterior cruciate ligament. Nippon Seigeigrka Gakkai Zasshi 60 (5): 547–562Google Scholar
  71. 1.
    Becker et al. (1991) Bilateral TKA.One cruciate retaining and one cruciate substituting. Clin Orthop 271: 122–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 2.
    Callaghan et al. (2000) Cemented rotating platform total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 82 A: 705–711Google Scholar
  73. 3.
    Dennis DA et al. (1996) In vivo kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop 331: 107–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 4.
    Dennis DA et al. (1998) In vivo anteroposterior femorotib- ial translation of TKA: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop 356: 47–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 5.
    Fontanesi G et al. (1991) Retentionof the PCL in TKA. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 17 (1): 65–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 6.
    Insall JN, Burstein AH (1972) Hospital for Special Surgery white paper.Google Scholar
  77. 7.
    Kadoya Y et al. (2001) Effects of cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral gap. Clin Orthop 391: 207–210Google Scholar
  78. 8.
    Kleinbart FA et al. (1996) Histological comparison of posterior cruciate ligaments harvested from arthritic and age- matched knee specimens. J Arthroplasty 11: 726–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 9.
    Nelissen PC, Hogendoorn PCW (2001) Retain or sacrifice the PCL in TKA? A histopathological study of the cruciate ligament in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid disease. I Clin Pathol 54: 381–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 10.
    Oschner JL (1993) Rupture of the PCL after TKA. Presented at Mid-America Orthopedic Association meetingGoogle Scholar
  81. 11.
    Pagnano MW et al. (1997) Flexion instability after primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 356: 39–46Google Scholar
  82. 12.
    Pagnano MW et al. (1998) Role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Amer Acad Orthop Surg 6 (3): 176–187Google Scholar
  83. 13.
    Pappas MJ, Buechel V¥ (1995) Biomechanics and design rationale: New Jersey LCS® knee replacement system. Bio-medical Engineering Trust Publication: 1–32Google Scholar
  84. 14.
    Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1992) Total knee arthroplasty, current clinical perspectives. Clin Orthop 276: 26–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 15.
    Simmons S et al. (1996) Proprioception following total knee arthroplasty with and without the posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty 11 (7): 763–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 16.
    Sorrells RB et al. (1993) Comparison of the clinical results and survivorship of noncemented cruciate substituting versus cruciate retaining TK’s. AAOS Scientific exhibit, San Francisco, CA, and white paper DePuy, Inc. Warsaw, In.Google Scholar
  87. 17.
    Sorrells RB (2001) The rotating platform mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Surg Technol lntl IX: 245–256Google Scholar
  88. 18.
    Stern SH, Insall JN (1994) Cruciate-substituting knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN (ed) The knee. Mosby,St. Louis,pp 1179–1198Google Scholar
  89. 19.
    Stiehl JB et al. (2000) The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 TKA’s. J Arthroplasty 15 (5): 545–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 20.
    Swany MR, Scott RD (1993) Posterior polyethylene wear in PCL retaining TKA (1993) J Arthroplasty 8 (4): 439Google Scholar
  91. 1.
    Aglietti P. Insall JN. Walker PS, Trent P (1975) A new patella prosthesis. Design and application. Clin Orthop 107: PS- IS?Google Scholar
  92. 2.
    Badalamente MA,Cherney SB (1989) Periosteal and vascular innervation of the human patella in degenerative joint disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum 18: 61–66Google Scholar
  93. 3.
    Barrack RL, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Muicic M, Bertot AJ, Myeis L (1997) Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79-A: 1121–1131Google Scholar
  94. 4.
    Boldt I. Kcblish P, Drobny T, Munsinger U, Varma C (2001) Patella non-resurfacing in low-contact-stress (LCS) mobile- bearing total knee aithroplasty (TKA): resultsof 1.777 TKAs with 2- to 15-year follow-up. Presented at AAOS 68th Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA. February 28-March lGoogle Scholar
  95. 5.
    Buechel FF, Pappas Ml, Makris G (1991) Evaluation of contact stress in mctal-backcd patellar replacement. A predictor of survivorship. Clin Oithop273: 190–197Google Scholar
  96. 6.
    Buechel l:l:, Pappas MJ (1989) New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Ortho Clin North Am 2:147–177Google Scholar
  97. 7.
    Buechel FF, Rosa RA, Pappas MJ (1989) A metal-hacked, rotating-bearing patellar prosthesis to lower contact stress. An 11 -year clinical study. Clin Orthop 248: 34–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 8.
    Callaghan II, Squire MW, GoeU DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2000) Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine- to twelve-year follow-up study. IBIS/Ami 82: 705–711Google Scholar
  99. 9.
    Dye S Cause of pain in the patellaGoogle Scholar
  100. 10.
    Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Elias SG, Manorenzi LJ, Gokcay El.Tuke M (1989) The patellofemoral joint in total knee prostheses. Design considerations. J Arthroplasty 4 (Suppl): S69–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 11.
    Hamelynck Kf (1998) The total knee prosthesis: indications and complications. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 142: 2030–2034Google Scholar
  102. 12.
    Insall IN, Aglietti P, Tria A! Jr (1983) Patellar pain and incongruence. II. Clinical application. Clin Orthop 176: 22S–232Google Scholar
  103. 13.
    Jordan I.R, Olm. JL, Voorhorst PF. (1997) Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 338: 119–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 14.
    Kaiino A. Yoshino S. Kameyama S. Kohda M. Nagashima S (1997) Comparison of the results of bilateral total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar replacement for rheumatoid arthritis. A follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79: 570–574Google Scholar
  105. 15.
    Keblish P (1991) Results and complications of the LCS (Low Contact Stress) knee system. Orthopaedica Belgica 57 (Suppl 2): 124–127Google Scholar
  106. 16.
    Keblish PA (2002) Alternate surgical approaches in mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25: 257–264Google Scholar
  107. 17.
    Kcblish PA (1991) The lateral approach to the valgus knee. Surgical technique and analysis of 53 cases with over two- year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 271: 52–62Google Scholar
  108. 18.
    keblish PA, Varma AK.Greenwald AS (1994) Patella resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 76: 930–937Google Scholar
  109. 19.
    Matsuda S. Ishinishi T, Whiteside LA (2000) Contact stresses with an unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty: the effect of femoral component design. Orthopedics 23: 213–218Google Scholar
  110. 20.
    Reilly DT, Martens M (1972) Experimental analysis of the quadriceps muscle force and patellofemoral joint reaction force for various activities. Acta Orthop Scan 43: 126–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 21.
    Reuben JD, McDonald CL, Woodward PL, llenmngton LJ (1991) Effect of patella thickness on patella strain follow¬ing total knee arthroplasty. I Arthroplasty 6: 251–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 22.
    Shoji H, Yoshino S, Kajino A (1989) Patellar replacement in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. A study of patients who had rheumatoid arthritis and no gross deformity of the patella. J Hone Joint Surg [Am] 71-A: 853–856Google Scholar
  113. 23.
    Sorrdls RB (1996) The rotating platform mobile bearing TKA. Orthopedics 19: 793–796Google Scholar
  114. 24.
    Stiehl JB. Cherveny PM (1996) Femoral rotational alignment using the tibial shall axis in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 331: 47–55Google Scholar
  115. 25.
    Stiehl JB, Komislek Rl). Dennis DA. Keblish PA (2001) Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16: 706–714Google Scholar
  116. 26.
    Stiehl JB. Komistek RD. Dennis DA. Keblish PA (2001) Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16: 706–715Google Scholar
  117. 27.
    Wojtys EM. Beaman DN.Glover RA, Janda D (1990) Innervation of the human knee joint by substance-P fibers. Arthroscopy 6: 254–263Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. Keblish
  • J. L. Briard
  • K. J. Hamelynck
  • W. Mueller
  • N. F. Friederich
  • B. Sorrells
  • D. E. Beverland

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations