A test to evaluate the impact of the CAD tools in mammographic diagnosis
In this work we present the results of a study about the impact of CAD tools on Sensitivity and Specificity in mammographic diagnosis. The approach is aimed to evaluate the statistical significance through the comparison of these figures of merit obtained in different situations. For this purpose two different CAD tools, the CALMA station (INFN project) and the SecondLook™ station (by CADx) have been used as a support for radiologists.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R.A. Smith, “Epidemiology of breast cancer”, “A categorical course in physics. Imaging considerations and medical physics responsibilities”, Madison, Wisconsin, 1991, Medical Physics Publishing.Google Scholar
- 8.C.J. Viborny “Can computer help radiologists read mammograms?” Radiology 191, 315–317, 1994.Google Scholar
- 11.Altman DG. “Praticai Statistics for Medical Reserch” Chapman & Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
- 12.F. Fauci and G. Raso, “A statistical method to compare diagnostic tests”, in press.Google Scholar
- 13.R. Palmiero, “The search for spiculated lesions in the CALMA project: status and perspectives” in “Neural Nets WIRN, Vietri-99”, Springer 1999.Google Scholar
- 14.S.R. Amendolia et al., “The CALMA mammographs database: image collection and CAD tools for spiculated lesions detection and texture classification” presented at TORONTO WDM 2000 Conference.Google Scholar
- 16.Burhenne L, Wood S, D’Orsi C e Coll., “Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography”. Radiology 215: 554–562, 2000Google Scholar
- 17.Freer TW, Ulissey MJ., “Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: a prospective study of21860 patients in a community breast center”, LXXXV Annual Meeting Radiological Society of North America. Chicago IL (USA) pag. 400; November–1 December, 2000.Google Scholar