Skip to main content

Double-Incision and Mini-Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation

  • Chapter
Book cover Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty
  • 225 Accesses

Abstract

The recent surge in interest in minimally invasive approaches for total hip arthroplasty has captured the attention of both surgeon and patient and resulted in a proliferation of new surgical techniques. Simultaneously we are experiencing the introduction of computerized navigation systems for total hip arthroplasty that enables the surgeon to more accurately and reproducibly perform bone preparation and component insertion. Both of these new technologies are still in their infancy and will continue to evolve markedly over forthcoming years, with surgeon experience and most importantly the results of appropriately constructed and performed clinical trials directing their path. The use of computerized navigation in total hip replacement allows the advantages of minimally invasive surgery to be combined with the safety of anatomical and other information available to the surgeon previously only afforded by more invasive exposures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Murray, D.W., AJ. Carr, C.J. Bulstrode. Which primary total hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995. 77 (4): 520–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali Khan, M.A., P.H. Brakenbury, I.S. Reynolds. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1981.63-B(2): 214–218

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demos, H.A., et al. Instability in primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct lateral approach.Clin Orthop 2001. (393): 168–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorr, L.D., Z. Wan. Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1998. (355): 144–151

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grossmann, P., M. Braun, W. Becker. Dislocation following total hip endoprosthesis. Association with surgical approach and other factors. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1994. 132 (6): 521–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirakawa, K. et al. Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001.(388): 135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy, J.G. et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty, 1998. 13 (5): 530–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCollum, D.E., WJ. Gray. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop 1990. (261): 159–170

    Google Scholar 

  9. DiGioia, A.M. et al.The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop 1998. (355): 8–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewinnek, G.E. et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978. 60 (2): 217–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paterno, S.A., P.F. Lachiewicz, S.S. Kelley. The influence of patient- related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997. 79 (8): 1202–1210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger, R.A. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop 2003 (417): 232–241

    Google Scholar 

  13. Higuchi, F. et al. Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision. J Orthop Sci 2003. 8 (6): 812–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodrigo, J.J.,Juan J. Rodrigo. MD on minimally invasive hip surgery. Orthopedics, 2002. 25 (10): 1016–1028

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sherry, E. et al. Minimal invasive surgery for hip replacement: a new technique using the NILNAV hip system. ANZ J Surg, 2003. 73 (3): 157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Waldman, B.J. Advancements in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 2003. 26 [8 Suppl]: S833–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wenz, J.F., I. Gurkan, S.R. Jibodh. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 2002. 25 (10): 1031–1043

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Digioia, A.M., 3rd et al. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty, 2003. 18 (2): 123–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leenders.T. et al. Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput Aided Surg, 2002. 7 (2): 99–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mielke, R.K. et al. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation-preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Gren-zgeb 2001. 139 (2): 109–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sparmann M. et al. Knieendoprothesennavigation mit dem Stryk- er-System. In: Konermann H.R. (ed) Navigation und Robotic in der Gelenk- und Wirbelsaulenchirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio. 2003. pp 250–255

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jenny J.Y. et al. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses - a comparative study with conventional instrumentation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 2001. 139: 117–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Digioia, A.M. III et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty, 2002. 17 (3): 359–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schep, N.W. et al. Validation offluoroscopy-based navigation in the hip region: what you see is what you get? Comput Aided Surg 2002. 7 (5): 279–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng, G. et al. A hybrid CT-free navigation system for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg, 2002. 7 (3): 129–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donnelly, B. (2004). Double-Incision and Mini-Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation. In: Hozack, W.J., et al. Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59298-0_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63926-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59298-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics