Skip to main content

Land Cover Mapping from Remotely Sensed Data with a Neural Network: Accommodating Fuzziness

  • Conference paper
Neurocomputation in Remote Sensing Data Analysis

Summary

Neural networks are attractive for the supervised classification of remotely sensed data. There are, however, many problems with their use, restricting the realisation of their full potential. This article focuses on the accommodation of fuzziness in the classification procedure. This is required if the classes to be mapped are continuous or if there is a large proportion of mixed pixels. A continuum of fuzzy classifications was proposed and it is shown that a neural network may be configured at any point along this continuum, from a completely-hard to a fully-fuzzy classification. Examples of fuzzy classifications are given illustrating the potential for mapping continuous classes and reducing the mixed pixel problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Townshend, J., Justice, C., Li, W., Gurney, C., and McManus, J., “Global land cover classification by remote sensing: present capabilities and future possibilities”, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 35, pp. 243–255, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Estes, J. E., and Mooneyhan, D. W., “Of maps and myths”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 517–524, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Townshend, J. R. G., “Land cover”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 13, pp. 1319–1328, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peddle, D. R., “An empirical comparison of evidential reasoning, linear discriminant analysis and maximum likelihood algorithms for land cover classification”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 19, pp. 31–44, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benediktsson, J. A., Swain, P. H., and Ersoy, O. K., “Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote sensing data”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 28, pp. 540–551, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanellopoulos, I., Varfis, A., Wilkinson, G. G., and Megier, J., “Land—cover discrimination in SPOT HRV imagery using an artificial neural network - a 20-class experiment”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 13, pp. 917–924, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schalkoff, R. J., Pattern Recognition: Statistical,Structural and Neural Approaches, Wiley, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foody, G. M., Campbell, N. A., Trodd, N. M., and Wood, T. F., “Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum likelihood classification”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 58, pp. 1335–1341, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maselli, F., Conese, C., and Petkov, L., “Use of probability entropy for the estimation and graphical representation of the accuracy of maximum likelihood classifications”, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 13–20, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Foody, G. M. and Boyd, D. S., (in press), “Observation of temporal variations in environmental gradients and boundaries in tropical West Africa with NOAA AVHRR data”, Proceedings RSS’96: Science and Industry, Remote Sensing Society, Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, F., “Improving remote sensing image analysis through fuzzy information representation”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,vol. 56, pp. 1163–1169, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foody, G. M., “Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely—sensed data”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 17, pp. 1317–1340, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foody, G. M. and Arora, M. K., (in press), “Incorporating mixed pixels in the training, allocation and testing stages of supervised classifications”, Pattern Recognition Letters.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foody, G. M., Lucas, R. M., Curran, P. J. and Honzak, M., (in press), “Nonlinear mixture modelling without end-members using an artificial neural network”, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, F. and Hall, G. B., “Fuzzy representation of geographical boundaries in GIS”, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems,vol. 10, pp. 573–590, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Foody, G.M. (1997). Land Cover Mapping from Remotely Sensed Data with a Neural Network: Accommodating Fuzziness. In: Kanellopoulos, I., Wilkinson, G.G., Roli, F., Austin, J. (eds) Neurocomputation in Remote Sensing Data Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59041-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59041-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63828-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59041-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics