Skip to main content

Comparison Between Systems of Image Interpretation

  • Conference paper

Summary

In this paper, we present classification methods, which have been adapted to the pattern recognition problem in the domain of aerial imagery. Three methods based on different mechanisms have been developed: rule-based system, neural networks and fuzzy classification. Our contributions are the adaptation of these methods to the concrete case of aerial images, and the quantitative comparison between the three types of methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J-P. Cocquerez, and S. Philipp, “Analyse d’images: Filtrage et segmentation”, ed Masson,Paris, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Nagao, and T. Matsuyama, “Edge preserving smoothing”, Computer vision,graphics, and image processing, vol. 9, pp. 394–407, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Huertas, and R. Nevatia, “Detecting buildings in aerial images”, CVGIP, vol. 41, pp. 131–152, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Mc Keown, W. A. Harvey, and J. Mc Dermott, “Rule-based interpretation of aerial imagery”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 7, no. 5, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, “Learning internal representations by error propagation”, in: Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition, vol. 1, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Charroux, and S. Philipp, “Interpretation of aerial images based on potential functions”, 9th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis,Uppsala, june 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J-P. Cocquerez, P. Gaussier, S. Philipp, and M. Zahid, “Expert-system and connectionist networks for complex aerial picture analysis”, 7th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, Aalborg, August 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Rosenfeld, R. A. Hummel, and S. W. Zucker, “Scene labelling by relaxation operations”, IEEE Transactions on System,Man and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-6, pp. 420–433,1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Charroux, S. Philipp, and J-P. Cocquerez, “Image analysis: segmentation operator cooperation led by the interpretation”, IEEE International. Conference on Image Processing, Lausanne, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cocquerez, JP., Philipp, S., Gaussier, P. (1997). Comparison Between Systems of Image Interpretation. In: Kanellopoulos, I., Wilkinson, G.G., Roli, F., Austin, J. (eds) Neurocomputation in Remote Sensing Data Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59041-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59041-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63828-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59041-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics