Advertisement

Defense of Cities by Antiballistic Missiles*

  • C. M. Haaland
  • E. P. Wigner
Part of the The Collected Works of Eugene Paul Wigner book series (WIGNER, volume B / 8)

Abstract

Given a number of short-range anti-ballistic missiles (ABM), one would like to distribute them among the possible targets in such a way as to minimize the fatalities which an attacker can cause. We have solved this mini-max problem by an elementary mathematical method. We found that there is an optimal distribution of the defending missiles which remains optimal independent of the size of the attack, provided the total number of defending missiles and the number of targets are reasonably large. Calculations for the U.S. indicate that the number of fatalities can be further reduced by a factor of 4 to 7 by means of passive defense, i.e., blast shelters, similar to those under Chinese cities.

Keywords

Optimal Defense Passive Defense Stanford Research Institute Effective Attack Additional Fatality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Matlin, A review of the literature on the missile-allocation problem, Operation Res., 18 (1970), pp. 334–373.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. M. Soland, Optimal defensive missile allocation: A discrete min-max problem, Ibid., 21 (1973) pp. 590–596.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    H. Everett, III, Generalized Lagrange multiplier method for solving problems of optimum allocation of resources, Ibid., 11 (1963), pp. 399–417. au[4]_I. J. Weinstein and O. S. Yu, Comment on an integer maximization problem, Ibid., 21 (1973), pp. 648–650.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    I. J. Weinstein and O. S. Yu, Comment on an integer maximization problem, Ibid., 21 (1973), pp. 648–650.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. J. Galiano and H. Everett III, LAMBDA Paper 6, DEFENSE MODELS IV, Some mathematical relations for probability of kill; Family of damage functions for multiple weapon attacks, LAMBDA Corp., Arlington, Va., March 1967 (Rev. Nov. 1967).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Missile Defense Analysis Project, 1975 Population of the United States by 5-Kilometer Quadrangles, Stanford Research Institute, Stanford, Calif., 1965.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. M. Haaland, E. P. Wigner and J. V. Wilson, Active and Passive Defense Interaction Studies, Vol 1, Summary, Models, and Calculations, ORNL-TM-3485, AD 747006, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 1971.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. L. Goodrich, LAMBDA Paper 7, DEFENSE MODELS V, IVAN 2, A detailed model for preferential defense, LAMBDA Corp., Arlington, Va., June 1968.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J.Alsop, Washington Post, December 1, 1972, and A. L. Gavshon, Associated Press, November 12, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. M. Haaland, Improved blast overpressure formula, Survive, March-April (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Haaland
    • 1
  • E. P. Wigner
    • 2
  1. 1.Health Physics DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  2. 2.Physics DepartmentPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations