Advertisement

The Development of the Phase Doppler Technique

  • Cameron Tropea
Part of the Heat and Mass Transfer book series (HMT)

Abstract

This article is meant as both a review and an outlook to developments of the phase Doppler Technique. The fundamental working principles are presented with reference to more recent developments in the computation of light scattering from small particles. This provides also a basis to discuss novel variations of the technique to either improve the measurement accuracy or to extend the technique to additional measurement quantities. Some first results about the measurement of nonspherical droplets are presented.

Keywords

Phase Doppler Anemometry Glare Point Phase Doppler Particle Analyser Part Part Volume Equivalent Diameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerometrics, Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer, 894 Ross Drive, Unit 105, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, USA (subsequently merged owned by TSI)Google Scholar
  2. Aizu Y, Durst F, Gréhan G, Onofri F, Xu T-H (1993) PDA systems without Gaussian beam defects. Erd Int Conf on Optical Particle Sizing, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht H-E; Borys M, Wenzel M, Wriedt Th (1994) Influence of the measurement volume on the phase error in phase Doppler anemometry, Part 1: Reflective mode operation. Part & Part Syst Charact 11: 339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albrecht H-E; Bech H; Damaschke N; Feleke M (1995) Die Berechnung der Streuintensität eines beliebig im Laserstrahl positionierten Teilchens mit Hilfe der zweidimensionalen Fouriertransformation. Optik 100: 118–124Google Scholar
  5. Albrecht H-E; Borys M; Wenzel M (1996) Influence of the measurement volume on the phase error in phase Doppler anemometry, Part 2: Analysis by extension of geometrical optics to the laser beam Refractive mode operation. Part & Part Syst Charact 13: 18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Albrecht H-E; Borys M; Damaschke N; Tropea C (1998) The imaging properties of scattering particles in laser neams, submitted to Meas. Sci. & Techn.Google Scholar
  7. Bachalo WD; Houser MJ (1984) Phase/Doppler spray analyser for simultaneousmeasurement of drop size and velocity distributions. Opt Eng 23: 583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borys M; Schelinsky B, Albrecht H-E, Krambeer H Light scattereing analysis with methods of geometrical optics for a particle arbitrarily positioned in a laser beam. Optik 108: 137–150Google Scholar
  9. Damaschke N, Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, Mignon H, Tropea C (1998) Response of PDA systems to non-spherical droplets. Appl Optics 37: 1752–1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dantec Measurement Technology A/S, Particle Dynamic Analyzer, Tonsbakken 14-18, P.O. Box 21,2740 Skovlunde, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  11. Dullenkopf K, Willmann M, Wittig S, Schöne F, Stieglmeier M, Tropea C, Mundo C (1998) Comparative mass flux measurements in sprays using patternator and phase-Doppler technique. Part Part Sys Charact 15: 81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durst F; Zaré M (1975) Laser Doppler measurements in two-phase-flows. Proc LDA ymposium Copenhagen 1975, Technical University of Denmark. Lyngby, Denmark, 403–429Google Scholar
  13. Flögel H-H (1981) Untersuchung von Teilchengeschwindigkeit und Teilchengröße mit einem Laser-Doppler-Anemometer. Diplomarbeit im Studiengang Physik, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany, Oktober 1981.Google Scholar
  14. Gouesbet G, Gréhan G, Maheu B (1991) Generalized Lorenz-Mie Theory and applications to optical sizing. In N Chigier (Ed.) Combustion Measurements. Hemisphere Publishing: 339–384Google Scholar
  15. Gréhan G, Gouesbet G, Naqwi A, Durst F (1991) Evaluation of a phase Doppler system using Generalized Lorenz-Mie Theory. Int Conf on Multiphase Flows’ 91, Tsukuba, JapanGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirleman ED (1996) History of development of the phase-Doppler particle sizing velocimeter. Part Part Syst Charact 13: 59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Invent Entwicklung Neuer Technologie GmbH, Phase Doppler Extension, Am Weichselgarten 21, 91058 Erlangen, Germany (subsequently merged iwth Dantec)Google Scholar
  18. Lehmann P, Wriedt T, Schöne A (1995) Time-resolved laser Doppler and phase Doppler signal processing. SPIE 2546: 246Google Scholar
  19. Mignon H, Gréhan G, Gouesbet G, Xu T-H, Tropea C (1996) Measurement of cylindrical particles with phase Doppler anemometry. Appl Optics 35: 5180–5190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Onofri F; Girasole Th;Gréhan G; Gouesbet G; Brenn G; Domnick J; Tropea C (1996) Phase-Doppler anemometry with dual burst technique for measurement of refractive index and absorption coefficient simultaneously with size and velocity. Part Part Syst Charact 13: 112–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Onofri F, Bergounoux L, Firpo J-L, Misguish-Ripault J (1998) Velocity, size and concentration in suspension measurements of cylindrical jets and spherical droplets. Symp on Appl of Laser Tech to Fluid Mech, Lisbon, Portugal: paper 9.2Google Scholar
  22. Qiu H-H, Hsu C T (1998) A new approach to eliminate the measurement volume effect in PDA measurements Symp on Appl of Laser Tech to Fluid Mech, Lisbon, Portugal: paper 9.5Google Scholar
  23. Qiu HH, Sommerfeld M (1992) A reliable method for determining the measurement volume size and particle mass fluxes using phase Doppler anemometry. Exp in Fluids 13: 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saffinan M; Buchhave H; Tanger H (1984) Simultaneous measurement of size, concentration and velocity of spherical particles by a laser-Doppler-anemo meter method. Proc of the 2nd International Symposium of Laser-Anemo metry to Fluid Mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal 8.1.1–8.1.6Google Scholar
  25. Saffinan M (1986) The use of polarized light for optical particle sizing. Laser Anem in Fluid Mech IV (Ed. Adrian, Durao, Durst, Mishina, Whitelaw) LADOAN-Lisbon 387–398Google Scholar
  26. Sellens RW (1989) A derivation of phase Doppler measurement relations for an arbitrary geometry. Exp in Fuids 8: 165–168Google Scholar
  27. Tropea C, Xu T-H, Onofri F, Gréhan G, Haugen P, Stieglmeier M (1996) Dual mode phase Doppler anemometer. Part Part Syst Charact 13: 165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. TSI Inc. Adaptive Phase/Doppler Velocimetry. 500 Cardigan Rd., P.B. Box 64204, St. Paul, MN 55164 USAGoogle Scholar
  29. Wriedt T, Manasse U, Bauchkhage K (1993) Deconvolution of PDA size distributions from sprays of optically inhomogeneous liquids. Proc 5th int conf Laser Anem Advances and Appl, Veldhoven: 137Google Scholar
  30. Xu T-H, Tropea C (1994) Improving the performance of two-component phase Doppler anemometers. Meas Sci Technol 5: 969–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cameron Tropea
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachgebiet Strömungslehre und AerodynamikTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations