Skip to main content

Results of Shoulder Arthroplasty in Acute Fractures of the Proximal Humerus

  • Conference paper
Shoulder Arthroplasty

Summary

Sixty-six patients with acute three and four-part proximal humeral fractures treated with humeral head replacement were reviewed and radiographed with an average follow-up of 19 months (12–57 months). At review, computed tomographic scans were available in 23 patients and scaled radiographs of both humeri were available in 39 patients. The most significant factors associated with a poor functional result were: (a) Migration of the greater tuberosity either posterior (29%) or superior (17%), leading to nonunion, malunion and late bone resorption. (b) Malposition of the prosthesis because of inappropriate length, the prosthesis being too proud (15%) or too low (29%) and/or excessive retroversion (14%). There was a clear correlation between prosthesis positioning and greater tuberosity migration (p=0.001): greater tuberosity migration was the consequence of malpositioning of the humeral prosthesis, particularly when the prosthesis was too proud, too retroverted. Multiple technical errors of prosthesis positioning may be associated and increase the risk of greater tuberosity detachment despite meticulous tuberosity reconstruction with associated bone graft and secure fixation with heavy nonabsorbable sutures. Prosthesis positioning is the key to greater tuberosity healing to the shaft and should be more accurate but is difficult because of the absence of proximal anatomical landmarks in three-and four-part fractures. The Aequalis fracture jig, a new device allowing for more accurate positioning of the prosthesis because of control of the humeral length and retroversion, has been designed because “eyeball” positioning of the prosthesis is insufficient. Its early use seems to be promissing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Mc Cluskey, Fischer RA (1991) Failed prosthetic replacement for displaced proximal humeral fractures. Orthop Trans 15:747–748

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boileau P, Chau E, Perraud M, Arcamone H, Argenson C (1993) Restoration of humeral length and humeral offset after shoulder prosthesis for fractures. Rev Chir Orthop 73:150

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boileau P, Walch G, Mazzoleni N, Urien JP (1993) In vitro measurement of humeral head retroversion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2(2):S12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boileau P, Huten D (1995) Technique chirurgicale des prothèses de Neer pour fractures céphalo-tubérositaires. Rev Chir Orthop 81 [Suppl II]:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boileau P, Walch G (1996) Prothèses d’épaule pour fractures: problèmes et solutions. Maitr Orthop 6:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boileau P, Walch G (1997) Three dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus: implications for the surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 79Br, 5:857–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Broca P (1881) La torsion de l’humérus et le tropomètre, instrument destiné à mesurer la torsion des os (rédigé par L Mamouvier). Rev Anthrop 2(4):193–210, 385–423, 1577–1592

    Google Scholar 

  8. Compito CA, Self EB, Bigliani LU (1994) Arthoplasty and acute shoulder trauma, reasons for success and failure. Clin Orthop 307:27–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Constant CR, Murley AHG (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Craig EV (1989) Prosthetic replacement for four part fractures of the proximal humerus. Tech Orthop 3:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Anquin CE, De Anquin CA (1982) Prosthetic replacement in the treatment of serious fractures of the proximal humerus. In: Bayley JL, Kessel L (eds): Shoulder Surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 207–217

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. DesMarchais JE, Maurais G (1984) Treatment of complex fractures of the proximal humerus by Neer’s hemiarthroplasty. In: Bateman JE, Welsh RP (eds) Surgery of the shoulder. Mosby, St Louis/Decker, Philadelphia, pp 60–63

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frich LH, Sojberg JO, Sneppen O (1991) Shoulder arthroplasty in complexe acute and chronic proximal humerus fractures. Orthopaedics 14:949–954

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldman RT, Koval KJ, Cuomo F, Gallagher MA, Zuckerman JD (1995) Functional outcome after humeral head replacement for acute three-and four-part proximal fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4(2):81–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Green A, Barnard WL, Imbird RS, Providence RI (1993) Humeral head replacement for acute four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Soulder Elbow Surg 2, 5:249–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hawkins RJ, Switlyk P (1993) Acute prosthetic replacement for severe fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop 289:156–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hurman WW, Jacobsen FS, Anderson JC, Chu WK (1987) Limb-length discrepency measured with computerised axial tomographic equipment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:699–705

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes M, Neer CS II (1975) Glenohumeral joint replacement and postoperative rehabilitation. Phys Ther 55:850–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huten D, Duparc J (1986) L’arthroplastie prothétique dans les traumatismes complexes récents et anciens de l’épaule. Rev Chir Orthop 72:517–529

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huten D, Boileau P, Bonnevialle P, Maynou C, Renault E, Vogt F, Postel JM, Candelier G, Fleure P (1996) Résultats et indications de l’arthroplastie prothétique dans les fractures récentes complexes de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus. Conférences d’Enseignement de la SOFCOT. Expansion Scientifique Française, Paris, pp 125–140

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ianotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Miras S (1992) The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:491–500

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacobson SR, Mallon WJ (1993) The glenohumeral offset ratio: a radiographic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2, 3:141–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jakob RP, Kristiansen T, Mayo K, Ganz R, Muller ME (1984) Classification and aspects of treatment of fractures of the proximal humeri. In: Bateman JE, Welsh RP (eds) Surgery of the shoulder. Mosby, St Louis/Decker, Philadelphia, pp 330–343

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kraulis J, Hunter G (1977) The results of prosthetics replacement in fractures dislocations of the upper end of the humerus. Injury 8:129–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khral VE, Evans FG (1945) Humeral torsion in man. Am J Phys Anthrop 3:229–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kristiansen B, Andersen LS, Olsen CA, Vasmarken JE (1988) The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus: an assessment of interobserver variation. Skeletal Radiol 17:420–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Muldon MP, Cofield RH (1997) Complications of humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Instruct Course Lect 46:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moeckel BH, Dines DM, Warren RF, Altchek DW (1992) Modular hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:884–889

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Neer CS III (1955) Articular replacement of the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37:215–228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Neer CS (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1077–1089

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Neer CS II (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three and four part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1090–1103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Neer CS, Kirby RM (1982) Revision of humeral head and total shoulder arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 100:189–195

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pietu G, Deluzarches P, Goin F, Letenneur J (1992) Traumatismes complexes de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus traités par prothèse céphalique: à propos de 21 cas revus avec un recul moyen de 4 ans. Acta Orthop Belg 58:159–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts SNJ, Foley APJ, Swallow HM, Wallace WA, Coughlan DP (1991) The geometry of the humeral head and the design of protheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:647–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rietveld ABM, Dannen HAM, Rozing PM, Oberman WR (1988) The lever arm in gleno humeral abduction after hemi arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:561–565

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, Cuomo F, Shoenberg N (1992) The Neer caassification for proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1745–1750

    Google Scholar 

  37. Siebenrock KA, Gerber C (1992) The reproductibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1751–1755

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sneppen O, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Frich LH (1990) Ectopic ossification after total shoulder arthroplasty. A study on 75 Neer total shoulder replacements. In: Post M, Morrey BF, Hawkins RT (eds) Surgery of the shoulder. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, pp 298–301

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stableforth PG (1984) Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:104–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Steel FLD, Tomlinson JDW (1989) The carrying angle in man. J Anat 92:315–317

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tanner MW, Cofield RH (1983) Prosthetic arthroplasty for fractures and fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop 179:116–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Walch G, Boileau P (1991) Morphological study of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 [Suppl I]:14

    Google Scholar 

  43. Willems WJ, Lim TEA (1985) Neer arthroplasty for humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 56:394–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zuckerman JD, Cuomo F, Koval KJ (1997) Proximal humeral replacement for complex fractures: indications and surgical technique. Instruct Course Lect 46:7–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zyto K, Kronberg M, Bröstrom LA (1995) Shoulder function after displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:331–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boileau, P., Tinsi, L., Le Huec, J.C., Molé, D., Sinnerton, R., Walch, G. (1999). Results of Shoulder Arthroplasty in Acute Fractures of the Proximal Humerus. In: Walch, G., Boileau, P. (eds) Shoulder Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58365-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58365-0_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63554-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58365-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics