Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures: Problems and Solutions

  • P. Boileau
  • G. Walch

Summary

Shoulder prosthesis positioning and tuberosity reconstruction in fractures have until now been very approximate. Because of the “eye-balling” involved in prosthesis positioning, tuberosity reconstruction was inaccurate. Not surprisingly, clinical results were poor and unpredictable, with a high rate of greater tuberosity migration. Anatomical reconstruction of the tuberosities is possible only if the prosthesis is positioned precisely for length and retroversion. The Aequalis fracture jig is a new device designed to help surgeons position the humeral implant correctly in both height and retroversion. The principle is simple: a ruler restores the length and a protractor restores the retroversion. This extramedullary guide helps to stabilize the prosthesis and minimizes the subjective assessment of the surgeon (whose experience is often limited) allowing better positioning of the prosthesis and therefore better reconstruction of the tuberosities. As no surgeon would now consider implanting a knee prosthesis without the appropriate jig, so we believe the same course should be followed when using a prosthesis for shoulder fractures.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, McCluskey, Fischer RA (1991) Failed prosthetic replacement for displaced proximal humeral fractures. Orthop Trans 15:747–748Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boileau P, Chau E, Perraud M, Arcamone H, Argenson C (1993) Restoration of humeral length and humeral offset after shoulder prosthesis for fractures. Rev Chir Orthop 73:150Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boileau P, Walch G, Mazzoleni N, Urien JP (1993) In vitro measurement of humeral head retroversion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2(2):S12Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boileau P, Huten D (1995) Technique chirurgicale des prothèses de Neer pour fractures céphalo-tubérositaires. Rev Chir Orthop 81 [Suppl11]:85–88Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boileau P, Walch G (1996) Prothèses d’épaule pour fractures: problèmes et solutions. Maîtrise Orthopédique 6:18–23Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boileau P, Walch G (1997) Three dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus: implications for the surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79B:857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broca P (1881) La torsion de l’humérus et le tropomètre, instrument destiné à mesurer la torsion des os (rédigée par L Mamouvier). Rev Anthrop 2(4):193–210, 385–423, 1577–1592Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Compito CA, Self EB, Bigliani LU (1994) Arthoplasty and acute shoulder trauma, reasons for success and failure. Clin Orthop 307:27–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Craig EV (1989) Prosthetic replacement for four part fractures of the proximal humerus. Tech Orthop 3:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Anquin CE, De Anquin CA (1982) Prosthetic replacement in the treatment of serious fractures of the proximal humerus. In: Bayley JL, Kessel L (eds) Shoulder Surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DesMarchais JE, Maurais G, (1984) Treatment of complex fractures of the proximal humerus by Neer’s hemiarthroplasty. In: Bateman JE, Welsh RP (eds) Surgery of the shoulder. Mosby, St Louis/Decker, Philadelphia, pp 60–63Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frich LH, Sojberg JO, Sneppen O (1991) Shoulder arthroplasty in complexe acute and chronic proximal humerus fractures. Orthopaedics 14:949–954Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldman RT, Koval KJ, Cuomo F, Gallagher MA, Zuckerman JD (1995) Functional outcome after humeral head replacement for acute three-and four-part proximal fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4(2):81–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green A, Barnard WL, Imbird RS, Providence RI (1993) Humeral head replacement for acute four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Soulder Elbow Surg 2:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hawkins RJ, Switlyk P (1993) Acute prosthetic replacement for severe fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop 289:156–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SI, Lippitt SB (1995) The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty: a study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:555–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hsu HC, Wu JJ, Chen TH, Lo WH, Yang DJ (1993) The influence of a abductor lever-arm changes after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2:134–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huten D, Duparc J (1986) L’arthroplastie prothétique dans les traumatismes complexes récents et anciens de l’épaule. Rev Chir Orthop 72:517–529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huten D, Boileau P, Bonnevialle P, Maynou C, Renault E, Vogt F, Postel JM, Candelier G, Fleure P (1996) Résultats et indications de l’arthroplastie prothétique dans les fractures récentes complexes de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus. Conférences d’Enseignement de la SOFCOT Expansion Scientifique Française, Paris, pp 125–140Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ianotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Miras S (1992) The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:491–500Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jacobson SR, Mallon WJ (1993) The glenohumeral offset ratio: a radiographic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2, 3:141–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kraulis J, Hunter G (1977) The results of prosthetics replacement in fractures dislocations of the upper end of the humerus. Injury 8:129–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khral VE, Evans FG (1945) Humeral torsion in man. Am J Phys Anthrop 3:229–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Muldoon MP, Cofield RH (1997) Complications of humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Instruct Course Lect 46:15–24Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moeckel BH, Dines DM, Warren RF, Altchek DW (1992) Modular hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:884–889PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neer CS III (1955) Articular replacement of the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37:215–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neer CS (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1077–1089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Neer CS II (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II Treatment of three and four part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1090–1103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neer CS, Mcllven SJ (1988) Remplacement de la tete humérale avec reconstruction des tubérosités et de la coiffe des rotateurs dans les fractures déplacées à 4-fragments. Résultats actuels et technique. Rev Chir Orthop 74 [Suppl II]:32–40Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pidhorz G, Saint-Cast Y, Grobost J, Boscher Y (1988) Traumatismes sévères récents de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus. Apport de la prothèse humérale (9 observations). Ann Orthop Ouest 20:31–37Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pietu G, Deluzarches P, Goin F, Letenneur J (1992) Traumatismes complexes de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus traités par prothèse céphalique: à propos de 21 cas revus avec un recul moyen de 4 ans. Acta Orthop Belg 58:159–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roberts SNJ, Foley APJ, Swallow HM, Wallace WA, Coughlan DP (1991) The geometry of the humeral head and the design of protheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:647–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rietveld ABM, Dannen HAM, Rozing PM, Oberman WR (1988) The lever arm in gleno humeral abduction after hemi arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:561–565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stableforth PG (1984) Four part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:104–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Steel FLD, Tomlinson JDW (1989) The carrying angle in man. J Anat 92:315–317Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tanner MW, Cofield RH (1983) Prosthetic arthroplasty for fractures and fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop 179:116–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tillett E, Smith M, Fulcher M, Shanklin J (1993) Anatomic determination of humeral head retroversion: the relationship of the central axis of the humeral head to the bicipital groove. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2:255–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Walch G, Boileau P (1991) Morphological study of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 [Suppl I]:14Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Willems WJ, Lim TEA (1985) Neer arthroplasty for humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 56:394–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Young TB, Wallace A (1985) Conservative treatment of fractures and fracture-dislocation of the upper-end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:373–377Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zuckerman JD, Cuomo F, Koval KJ (1997) Proximal humeral replacement for complex fractures: indications and surgical technique. Instruct Course Lect 46:7–14Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zyto K, Kronberg M, Brostrom LA (1995) Shoulder function after displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Boileau
  • G. Walch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations