Abstract
This paper compares the suitability and efficacy of five algorithms for determining the peak position of a line or light stripe to subpixel accuracy. The algorithms are compared in terms of accuracy, robustness and computational speed. In addition to empirical testing, a theoretical comparison is also presented to provide a framework for analysis of the empirical results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
B. G. Batchelor, D. A. Hill and D. C. Hodgson, “Automated Visual Inspection”, IFS (Publications) Ltd, UK, North Holland, 1985.
F. Blais & M. Rioux, “Real-Time Numerical Peak Detector”, Signal Processing 11, pp 145–155, 1986.
D. Braggins, “Achieving subpixel precision”, Sensor Review, Volume 10, No. 4, pp 174–177, 1990.
P. J. MacVicar-Whelan & T. O. Binford, “Intensity Discontinuity Location to Subpixel Precision”, Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 752-754, 1981.
D. K. Naidu, R. B. Fisher, “A Comparitive Analysis of Algorithms for Determining the Peak Position of a Stripe to Sub-Pixel Accuracy”, Proc. 1991 British Machine Vision Association Conf., pp 217-225, Glasgow, 1991.
S. J. White, “Method and Apparatus for Locating Center of Reference Pulse in a Measurement System”, U.S. Patent No. 4,628,469, December 1986.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fisher, R.B., Naidu, D.K. (1996). A Comparison of Algorithms for Subpixel Peak Detection. In: Sanz, J.L.C. (eds) Image Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58288-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58288-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63528-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58288-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive