Advertisement

East-West Problems in Europe and North-South Conflicts

  • Paul J. J. Welfens
Chapter
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

A new Europe is emerging after the politico-economic collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe. The smaller countries of the former Council of Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA) have split into two groups: on the one hand, the group of fast reforming economies Poland, Hungary and the CSFR – possibly enlarged by Croatia and Slovenia -, and the slowly changing countries Romania and Bulgaria in which former communists exert no less influence than in Yugoslavia’s core Serbia. The former USSR has disintegrated into several countries, most of which are forming the Commonwealth of Independent States. The CIS and the future countries that might finally emerge from it – with separate currencies and new customs duties that impair trade – face much more difficult problems in systemic transformation than the smaller ex-CMEA countries. Without a functional memory of the market economy and a stabilizing middle class and saddled with ethnic minority problems in a period of new nationalism as well as so many new economic problems, the former USSR will face a difficult adjustment path.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Market Economy OECD Country Systemic Transformation Military Expenditure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BALCEROWICZ, L. and WELFENS, Ñ.J.J., eds. (1988), Innovationsdynamik im Systemvergleich. Theorie und Praxis unternehmerischer, gesamtwirtschaftlicher und politischer Neuerung, Heidelberg: Physica/Springer.Google Scholar
  2. BECKER, G.S. (1957), The Economics of Discrimination, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. BRETON, á. (1964), The Economics of Nationalism, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 72, 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BRIEFS, G.E. (1950), Shifting Patterns in Eastern Europe’s Foreign Trade 1928-1948, Diss. PH.D.Econ, Harvard University, Cambridge: Mass.Google Scholar
  5. BRITO, D.L. und INTRILIGATOR, M.D. (1981), Strategic Arms Limitations Treaties and Innovations in Weapon Technology, Public Choice, Vol. 3, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BROZKA, M. (1986), Arms Production in the Third World, London: Taylor.Google Scholar
  7. BURNETT, W.B. und SCHERER, F.M. (1990), The Weapons Industry, in: ADAMS, WALTER, Ed., The Structure of American Industry, 8th ed., London: Macmillan, 289–317.Google Scholar
  8. BYERS, J.D. und PEEL, D. (1989), The Determinants of Arms Expenditures of NATO and the Warsaw Pact: Some Further Evidence, Journal of Peace Research, 26 (1989), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CHECINSKI, M. (1989), The Legacy of the Soviet War-Economy and Implications for Gorbachev’s Perestroika, The Journal of Soviet Military Studies, Vol. 2, 206–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CHECINSKI, M. (1991), The Conversion of the Soviet Arms Industry: Plans, Reality and Prospects, Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, Vol. 36, 15–34.Google Scholar
  11. COLLINS, S.M. and RODRIK, D. (1991), Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in the World Economy, Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  12. COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS (1991), Economic Report of the President 1991, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  13. DEGER, S. und SMITH, R. (1990), Military Expenditure: The Political Economy of National Security, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. DEUTSCHE BANK (1991), The Peace Dividend — How to Pin it Down?, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
  15. DUMAS, L.J. (1979), Armament, Disarmament and National Security: A Theoretical Duopoly Model of the Arms Race, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 6, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DUNN, L.A. (1992), Containing Nuclear Proliferation, IISS Adelphi Papers, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  17. FREY, S. (1974), Subventionierung der Abrüstung: Ein unorthodoxer Vorschlag zur Friedensforschung, Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique, Vol. 14, 57–68.Google Scholar
  18. GORDON, S., McFADDEN, D., Ed.(1984), Economic Conversion, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. HEWITT, D.P. (1991a), Military Expenditure: International Comparisons of Trends, IMF Staff Working Paper, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  20. HEWITT, D.P. (1991b), Military Expenditure: Econometric Testing of Economic and Political Influences, IMF Staff Working Paper, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  21. HIRSHLEIFER, J. (1986), The Economic Approach to Conflict, in: RADNITZKY, G. und BERNHOLZ, P., Ed., Economic Imperialism, New York, 335–364.Google Scholar
  22. ISARD, W. et al. (1989), Arms Races, Arms Control, and Conflict Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. JOHNSON, H.G. (1965), Nationalism in New and Developing Countries, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 80, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. KENNEDY, G. (1975), The Economics of Defence, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. KRELLE, W. (1989), The Future of the World Economy, Heidelberg and New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. LEVY, J.S. (1985), Theories of General War, World Politics, Vol. 37, 344–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LINDERT, P.H. (1986), International Economics, 8th ed., Homewood, Ill.: Irwin.Google Scholar
  28. McMILLAN, J. (1986), Game Theory in International Economics, Chur: Harwood.Google Scholar
  29. McGUIRE, M.C. (1977), A Quantitative Study of the Strategic Arms Race in the Missile Age, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 59, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. PAUKERT, L. und RICHARD, P. (1991), Defence Expenditure, Industrial Conversion and Local Employment, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  31. POLACHEK, S.W. (1980), Conflict and Trade, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 24, 55–78.Google Scholar
  32. RICHARDSON, L.F. (1960), Arms and Insecurity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. ROMER, P. (1990), Are Nonconvexities Important for Understanding Growth?, American Economic Review, Vol. 80, P&P, 97–103.Google Scholar
  34. SAY, J.-B. (1834), Catechisme d’économie politique, Paris: Arnaud.Google Scholar
  35. SCHELLING, T.C. (1966), Arms and Influence, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. SCHMIDT, ed. (1987), The Economics of Military Expenditures: Military Expenditures, Economic Growth and Fluctuations, Hampshire: McMillan.Google Scholar
  37. SIMAAN, M. und CRUZ, J.B., Jr. (1975), Formulation of Richardson’s Model of the Arms Race from a Differential Game Viewpoint, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 42, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SIPRI (1988, 1991), SIPRI Yearbook 1988, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. SIVARD, R.L. (1988, 1989), World Military and Social Expenditures, 12th ed., 13th ed., Washington, D.C.: World Priorities.Google Scholar
  40. SMITH, M.R., ed. (1985), Military Enterprise and Technological Change, Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. STEINBERG, D. (1990), Trends in Soviet Military Expenditure, Soviet Studies, Vol. 42, 675–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. THEE, M., ed. (1981), Armaments, Arms Control and Disarmament, Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
  43. UN Development Programme (1992), Human Development Report 1992, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. WEBER, E. (1971), Stadien der Außenhandelsverflechtung Ostmittel-und Südosteuropas, Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
  45. WELFENS, P.J.J. (1989a), The Economics of Military and Peacekeeping: An Emerging Field, Jahrbuch für Sozialwissenschaft, Vol. 40, 358–385.Google Scholar
  46. WELFENS, P.J.J. (1989b), Globalization of Markets and Regional Integration, Intereconomics, 1989/12, 273–281.Google Scholar
  47. WELFENS, P.J.J. (1991),European Monetary Integration, New York: Springer, 2nd ed. forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. WELFENS, P.J.J. (1992a), Economic Aspects of German Unification, Heidelberg and New York.Google Scholar
  49. WORLD BANK (1991), World Development Report 1991, New York.Google Scholar
  50. WORLD BANK (1992), Free Trade Agreements with the US: What’s in it for Latin America?, Washington D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul J. J. Welfens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations