Privatization and Foreign Investment in Eastern Europe

  • Paul J. J. Welfens

Abstract

Having experienced a decade of economic stagnation and increasing political and economic disruptions the East European economies — including the republics of the former USSR — have finally decided to radically change their socialist economic system and move towards a market economy. In order to achieve a market-based system a lengthy transition process must be endured in which new institutions are created, the distortions of the command economy removed and the supply-side is reorganized in a way that economic resources are efficiently produced and distributed. This transition period to a market-based system necessarily cannot be characterized by the same economic and political principles as those shaping the desired new market economy. Even the case of the former GDR is not a pure big leap strategy, although the introduction of West Germany’s institutions and laws in the context of economic union on June 1, 1990 and political union on October 3, 1990 brought a radical regime switch for Eastern Germany; this switch, however, was mitigated by transitory regulations in many fields (e.g. environmental protection and labor market regulations) and a massive West-East transfer of resources in the united Germany. The privatization process as a centerpiece of systemic change was organized by the Treuhandanstalt (“THA”, a public entity under the supervision of the Bundesministerium der Finanzen) and has made considerable progress within two years: the so-called small privatization in the retail and small service industry has been fully completed, while the “big” privatization of industry has made progress to the extent that 1/2 of the some 11,000 firms had been privatized by the May 1992 (accounting for roughly 40 % of all jobs in THA enterprises). West German firms clearly dominated as buyers of privatized firms, i.e. they accounted for 90 % of the assets that were privatized. Foreign investment has so far played a minor role even in the manufacturing industry and in the services industry where West Germany traditionally has recorded a high stock of inward foreign investment.

Keywords

Clay Migration Europe Income Marketing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AMBROSIUS, A. (1984), Der Staat als Unternehmer, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
  2. AUDRETSCH, D.B. and ACS, Z. (1990), Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in a Global Perspective: A Comparison between West and East Countries, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin för Sozialforschung, FS IV 90-13.Google Scholar
  3. BAIROCH, P. (1976), Europe’s Gross National Product, 1800-1975, Journal of European Economic History, Vol. 5, 273–329.Google Scholar
  4. BISHOP, M. and KAY, J. (1988), Does Privatization Work?, London Business School.Google Scholar
  5. BLAICH, F. (1984), Amerikanische Firmen in Deutschland 1890-1918, Zeitschrift för Unternehmensgeschichte, Beiheft 30, Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
  6. BORCHERDING, T.E.et al. (1982), Comparing the Efficiency of Private and Public Production: The Evidence from Five Countries, Zeitschrift för Nationaloekonomie, Supplementum 2, 127–156.Google Scholar
  7. EDWARDS, S. (1990), Stabilization and Liberalization Policies in Eastern Europe: Lessons from Latin America, paper presented at the American Economic Association Annual Meetings, Washington, DC, Dec. 27-30, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. FLOYD, R.H. et al. (1984), Public Enterprise in Mixed Economics, Washington, D.C: IMF.Google Scholar
  9. FRANZ, á.; SCHIPKE, A. and GROSZEK, M. (1991), Privatization in Poland: A Property Rights Approach, in M. KREMER and M. WEBER, eds., Transforming Economic Systems: The Case of Poland, Heidelberg: Physica.Google Scholar
  10. GRÖNER, H. and SMEETS, H.-D. (1991), Transformation der Außenwirtschaft: Zur Öffnung und Weltmarktintegration geschlossener Volkswirtschaften, in: Hartwig, K.H. and Thieme, HJ., eds., Transformationsprozesse in sozialistischen Wirtschaftssystemen, Heidelberg: Springer, 357–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GROUP OF THIRTY (1991), Financing Eastern Europe, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  12. HARE, P. and GROSFELD, I (1991), Privatisation in Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 544.Google Scholar
  13. INOTAI, A. (1992), Foreign Direct Investments in Reforming CMEA Countries: Facts, Lessons and Perspectives, in: Klein M.W. and Paul J.J. Welfens, eds., Multinationals in the New Europe, Heidelberg and New York, 129–138.Google Scholar
  14. JASINSKI, P. (1990), Two Models of Privatisation in Poland. A Critical Assessment, Communist Economics, Vol. 2, 373–401.Google Scholar
  15. JETRO (1991), JETRO White Paper on Foreign Direct Investment, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  16. KLEIN, M. and WELFENS, P.J.J., eds. (1992), Multinationals in the New Europe and Global Trade, Heidelberg and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LIPTON, D. and J. SACHS (1990), Privatization in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1990/2, 293–341.Google Scholar
  18. MILANOVIC, B. (1989), Liberalization and Entrepreneurship: Dynamics of Reform in Socialism and Capitalism, Armonk, N.Y.: Sharp.Google Scholar
  19. MYERS, S.C (1977), Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics, 1977/5(2), 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. OECD (1992), Reforming the Economics of Central and Eastern Europe, Paris.Google Scholar
  21. PINDYCK, R.S. (1991), Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 29, 1110–1148.Google Scholar
  22. POZNANSKI, K.(1987), Technology, Competition and the Soviet Bloc in the World Market, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
  23. PERA, A. (1988), Deregulation and Privatisation in an Economy-wide Context, OECD Studies, Vol. 11, 159–197.Google Scholar
  24. PICOT, A. and KAULMANN, T. (1989), Comparative Performance of Government-owned and Privately-owned Industrial Corporations — Empirical Results from Six Countries, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 145, 298–316.Google Scholar
  25. PINDYCK, R.S. (1988), Irriversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm, American Economic Review, Vol. 78, 969–985.Google Scholar
  26. PUPILLO, L. and ZIMMERMANN, K.F. (1991), Relative Export Prices and Firm Size in Imperfect Markets, Open Economics Review, Vol. 2, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SCHMIEDING H. and KOOP M.J. (1991), Privatisierung in Mittel-und Osteuropa: Konzepte för den Hindernislauf zur Marktwirtschaft, Kiel Discussion Paper No. 165: Institut för Weltwirtschaft.Google Scholar
  28. SCHNABEL, C. (1990), Privatisierung und Deregulierung in Großbritannien, List Forum för Wirtschafts-und Gesellschaftspolitik, Vol. 16, 148–166.Google Scholar
  29. THIEME, HJ. (1991), Reformen des monetären Sektors in sozialistischen Ländern: Ursachen, Transformationsbedingungen und institutionelle Voraussetzungen, Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 24, 16–35.Google Scholar
  30. UNCE (UN Economic Commission for Europe, 1992), Economic Survey of Europe, Geneva.Google Scholar
  31. WELFENS, P.J.J. (1990b), Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe: Problems, Options and Opportunities, Testimony before the United States Senate, March 23, 1990.Google Scholar
  32. WELFENS, P.J.J. (1992a), Internationalization of Production, Foreign Direct Investment and European Integration: Free Trade in Goods, Technology and Assets?, in: Klein, M. and Welfens, P.J.J., eds., Multinationals in the New Europe and Global Trade, 9–54.Google Scholar
  33. WELFENS, P.J.J., ed. (1992b), European Monetary Integration. From German Dominance to an EC Central Bank, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. WELFENS, P.J.J. and BALCEROWICZ, L., eds. (1988), Innovationsdynamik im Systemvergleich, Heidelberg: Physica.Google Scholar
  35. WORLD BANK (1991), World Development Report, New York 1991.Google Scholar
  36. YARROW, G. (1986), Privatisation in Theory and Practice, Economic Policy, Vol. 2, 323–364 and 373-379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul J. J. Welfens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations