Representation of the Fission Spectrum and Multiplication Calculations

  • R. L. Perel
  • J. J. Wagschal
Conference paper
Part of the Research Reports in Physics book series (RESREPORTS)


We investigated the different representations of the fission process as total fission on one hand and as the sum of direct fission, first chance fission, second, third and fourth chance fission on the other hand (MT = 18 versus MT = 19, 20, 21 and 38 in ENDF terminology).

The representations of these cross sections (MF = 3) in ENDF/B libraries are generally consistent, but the fission spectrum (MF=5) of the total fission given in libraries is generally not equivalent to the fission spectrum obtained from all partial spectra.

We calculated the effective multiplication factor k eff of several simple near critical systems and the neutron leakage from a central 14 MeV neutrons source embedded in simple subcritical systems. We found that in certain cases there is a non-negligible difference in the results, depending on the representation of the fission spectrum that was used; in other cases the differences were small. These results are explained in the paper.

As a conclusion we propose improvements in the methodology of the representation of fission in ENDF-6 format and also suggest changes in the data of some materials in ENDF/B-VI.


Fission spectrum ENDF/B-VI direct fission first chance fission 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. W. Engle, Jr., ANISN, A One-Dimensional Discrete Ordinates Transport Code with Anisotropic Scattering, K-1693, Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant (1967).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. J. Wagschal and A. Yaari, A Systematic Test of the ENDF/B-ill Evaluated Cross-Section Library on ‘Clean’ Critical Assemblies, in Nuclear Data in Science and Technology II, IAEA-SM-170/19, International Atomic Energy Agency (1973).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ENDF-102, Data Formats and Procedures for the Evaluated Nuclear Data File, ENDF, Revised by R. Kinsey, National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. D. Arthur, P. G. Young, D. G. Madland, and R. E. MacFarlane, Evaluation and Testing of n + Pu-239 Nuclear Data for Revision 2 of ENDF /B-V, Nuc. Sci Eng., 88, 56–70 (1984).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ENDF-202, Cross Section Evaluation Working Group Benchmarks Specifications, National Neutron Cross Section Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, (1974 with later revisions and additions).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. E. MacFarlane, D. W. Muir, and R. M. Boicourt, The NJOY Nuclear Data Processing System, Vols 1 to 4, LA-9303-M, (ENDF-324), Los Alamos National Laboratory, (May 1982 to December 1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Perel
    • 1
  • J. J. Wagschal
    • 1
  1. 1.Racah Institute of PhysicsThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations