Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stellenwert bildgebender Verfahren in der Kniegelenksdiagnostik

  • Chapter
Knie

Part of the book series: Fortbildung Orthopädie ((FORTORTHO,volume 3))

  • 131 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die nachfolgende Synopsis soll die Differentialindikation und technischen Grundlagen der verschiedenen bildgebenden Verfahren darstellen. Schwerpunkt wird dabei die Magnetresonanztomographie des traumatisierten Kniegelenks sein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Alioto RJ, et al (1999) The influence of MRI on treatment decisions regarding knee injuries. Am J Knee Surg 12(2): 91–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barry KP, et al (1996) Accuracy of MRI patterns in evaluating anterior cruciate ligament tears. Skeletal Radiology 25(4): 365–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brossmann J, et al (1997) Short echo time projection reconstruction MR imaging of cartilage: comparison with fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS and magnetization transfer contrast MR imaging. Radiology 203(2): 501–507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bui-Mansfield LT, et al (1997) Potential cost savings of MR imaging obtained before arthroscopy of the knee: evaluation of 50 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(4): 913–918

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandnani VP, et al (1991) Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution. Radiology 178(2): 557–561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dardzinski BJ, et al (1997) Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology 205(2): 546–550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Smet AA, et al (1993) MR diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee: importance of high signal in the meniscus that extends to the surface. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161(1): 101–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Smet AA, et al (1993) Diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee with MR imaging: effect of observer variation and sample size on sensitivity and specificity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(3): 555–559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Smet AA, et al (1994) MR diagnosis of meniscal tears: analysis of causes of errors [see comments]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(6): 1419–1423

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Smet AA, Graf BK (1994) Meniscal tears missed on MR imaging: relationship to meniscal tear patterns and anterior cruciate ligament tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(4): 905–911

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Disler DG, et al (1996) Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy [see comments]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167(1): 127–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Disler DG, McCauley TR (1998) Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9(6): 360–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Erickson SJ, et al (1996) Hyaline cartilage: truncation artifact as a cause of trilaminar appearance with fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient — recalled sequences [see comments]. Radiology 201(1): 260–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eriksson K, et al (1999) Semitendinosus tendon regeneration after harvesting for ACL reconstruction. A prospective MRI study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7(4): 220–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer SP, et al (1991) Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73(1): 2–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzgibbons RE, Shelbourne KD (1995) “Aggressive” nontreatment of lateral meniscal tears seen during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 23(2): 156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fowler PJ, Lubliner JA (1989) The predictive value of five clinical signs in the evaluation of meniscal pathology. Arthroscopy 5(3): 184–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frank LR, et al (1997) MR imaging truncation artifacts can create a false laminar appearance in cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(2): 547–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardy PA, et al (1996) Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 6(2): 329–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hutchinson CH, Wojtys EM (1995) MRI versus arthroscopy in evaluating knee meniscal pathology. Am J Knee Surg 8(3): 93–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Imhoff A, et al (1997) [Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy for the diagnosis of knee meniscal lesions]. Revue De Chirurgie Orthopedique Et Reparatrice De L’Appareil Moteur 83(3): 229–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson DW, et al (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Am J Sports Med 16(1): 29–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Justice WW, Quinn SF (1995) Error patterns in the MR imaging evaluation of menisci of the knee. Radiology 196(3): 617–621

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kramer J, et al (1994) Postcontrast MR arthrography in assessment of cartilage lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18(2): 218–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, Heiken JP (1998) Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lintner DM, et al (1995) Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Are they clinically detectable? [see comments]. Am J Sports Med 23(1): 111–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mackenzie R, et al (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness. Clinical Radiology 51(4): 245–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mackenzie R, et al (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: diagnostic performance studies. Clinical Radiology 51(4): 251–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McCauley TR, Disler DG (1998) MR imaging of articular cartilage. Radiology 209(3): 629–640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mesgarzadeh M, et al (1993) MR imaging of the knee: expanded classification and pitfalls to interpretation of meniscal tears. Radiographies 13(3): 489–500

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miller MD, et al (1993) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Orthop Rev 22(11): 1201–1210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller GK (1996) A prospective study comparing the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of meniscus tear with magnetic resonance imaging and its effect on clinical outcome [see comments]. Arthroscopy 12(4): 406–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mink JH, Levy T, Crues JVd (1988) Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci of the knee: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 167(3): 769–774

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mink JH, et al (1993) MRI of the Knee, 2nd ed. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Munk B, et al (1998) Clinical magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in knees: a comparative prospective study of meniscus anterior cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions. Arthroscopy 14(2): 171–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Shea KJ, et al (1996) The diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, and radiographs in the evaluation of traumatic knee disorders. Am J Sports Med 24(2): 164–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Potter HG, et al (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging [see comments]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(9): 1276–1284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pruès-Latour V, Bonvin JC, Fritschy D (1998) Nine cases of osteonecrosis in elderly patients following arthroscopic meniscectomy. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6(3): 142–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rappeport ED, et al (1996) MR imaging before arthroscopy in knee joint disorders? [see comments]. Acta Radiologica 37(5): 602–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rappeport ED, et al (1997) MRI preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in knee joint injuries. A double-blind comparison of 47 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 68(3): 277–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Recht MP, et al (1993) Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. Radiology 187(2): 473–478

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Recht MP, Resnick D (1994) MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(2): 283–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Recht MP, et al (1996) Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 198(1): 209–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Resnick D (1995) Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders, 3rd ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  45. Resnick D, Kang HS (1997) Internal Derangement of Joints. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rose NE, Gold SM (1996) A comparison of accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament tears [see comments]. Arthroscopy 12(4): 398–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schweitzer ME, et al (1995) Medial collateral ligament injuries: evaluation of multiple signs, prevalence and location of associated bone bruises, and assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 194(3): 825–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sonin AH, et al (1994) Posterior cruciate ligament injury: MR imaging diagnosis and patterns of injury. Radiology 190(2): 455–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sonin AH, et al (1995) MR imaging of the posterior cruciate ligament: normal, abnormal, and associated injury patterns. Radiographics 15(3): 551–561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Speer KP, et al (1995) Observations on the injury mechanism of anterior cruciate ligament tears in skiers. Am J Sports Med 23(1): 77–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Spiers AS, et al (1993) Can MRI of the knee affect arthroscopic practice? A prospective study of 58 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(1): 49–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Stoller D (1997) MRI in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 2nd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  53. Suh JS, et al (1996) Chondromalacia of the knee: evaluation with a fat-suppression three-dimensional SPGR imaging after intravenous contrast injection. J Mag Res Imag 6(6): 884–888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Trieshmann HWJ, Mosure JC (1996) The impact of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee on surgical decision making. Arthroscopy 12(5): 550–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Vallotton JA, et al (1995) Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of patellar cartilage lesions: a prospective study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3(3): 157–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Veltri DM, Warren RF (1994) Operative treatment of posterolateral instability of the knee. Clin Sports Med 13(3): 615–627

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Veltri DM, Warren RF (1994) Anatomy, biomechanics, and physical findings in posterolateral knee instability. Clin Sports Med 13(3): 599–614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Weinstabl R, et al (1997) Economic considerations for the diagnosis and therapy of meniscal lesions: can magnetic resonance imaging help reduce the expense? World J Surg 21(4): 363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. T. Merl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. B. Imhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung und Poliklinik für Sportorthopädie, TU München, Connollystraße 32, 80809, München, Germany

    Andreas B. Imhoff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Merl, T., Imhoff, A.B. (2000). Stellenwert bildgebender Verfahren in der Kniegelenksdiagnostik. In: Imhoff, A.B. (eds) Knie. Fortbildung Orthopädie, vol 3. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57733-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57733-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1181-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57733-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation