Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

United Kingdom

  • Chapter
Social Security and Solidarity in the European Union

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

What is to become of the welfare state is a basic question within social and political policy — a question, which has dominated the political agenda in the UK for some time. In the past opinion has been divided between incremental change to the benefit system and more radical reform to the balance between cash benefits and services, means-testing and universality. The last two decades have witnessed substantial change in the welfare in the UK. Motives for reform have been diverse: to reduce the benefits bill, to reduce the length of time spent on benefit, to create incentives for people to move from welfare to work and to improve quality of services. At different times, different strategies have been adopted, but much of the discussion in the UK has been based on snapshots, leading to decisions, which later have proved inadequate or inappropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Department of Social Security, New Ambitions for our country: A New Contract for Welfare, Cm 3805, London: HMSO, March 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Esping-Anderson, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Hills, Thatcherism, New Labour and the Welfare State (London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, 1998. CASE-paper CASE/13), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Peck and N. Theodore, Between Welfare and Work: Workfare and the Re-regulation of Contingent Labour Markets. Paper presented at the 20th International Working Party on Labour Market Segmentation, July 9–14, 1998, Arco, Trento, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Oppenheim, ‘Welfare Reform and the Labour Market: a ‘third way’?’, in: Benefits. A Journal of Social Security Research, Policy and Practice, (1999), no. 25, April/May, p. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Social Exclusion Unit, Bringing Britain Together. A national strategy for neighbourhood renewal, Cm 4045, London: HMSO, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The principal Acts of Parliament include the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992, the Social Security Administration Act 1992, the Pensions Scheme Act 1993, the Pensions Act 1995, the Jobseekers Act 1995 and the Social Security Act 1998. At the time of writing the Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill is being considered by the UK Parliament. We do not make detailed references to statutory sources in the text below; Ogus, Barendt and Wikeley provides a detailed account of the legal structure of the social security system: A. Ogus, E. Barendt, and N. Wikeley, The Law of Social Security, London: Butterworths, 1995 (4th ed.). See also J. Mesher and P. Wood, Income-Related Benefits: The Legislation, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a detailed narrative of the history of the administration of social security in Britain see Ogus, Barendt, and Wikeley, The Law of Social Security, ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) and DSS; A New Contract for Welfare: the gateway to work, Cm 4102, London: HMSO, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DSS, Social Security. Departmental Report 1999, London: HMSO, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Statutory sick pay and Statutory Maternity Pay, since 1994 and 1992 respectively, have been partly payable by employers (see below).

    Google Scholar 

  12. DSS, Social Security. Departmental Report 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. DSS, Social Security Departmental Report 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Maclennan, Low Paid and Excluded, London: TUC, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Williams, Social Security Taxation, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Hills, The Future of Welfare, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. DSS, A New Contract for Welfare: Partnership in Pensions, Cm 4179, London: HMSO, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. McCormick, ‘Prospects for Pension Reform’, in: J. McCormick and C. Oppenheim (Eds.), Welfare in Working Order (London: Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), 1998), p. 175–249.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Nobles, ‘The Pensions Act 1995’, in: Modern Law Review, 59 (1996), no. 2, p. 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DfEE and DSS, A New Contract for Welfare, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See the Employment Relations Act 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. White, S. Lissenburgh, and A. Bryson, The Impact of Public Job Placing Programmes, London: Policy Studies Institute, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Oppenheim, ‘Welfare Reform and the Labour Market: a ‘third way’?’, in: Benefits: A Journal of Social Security Research, Policy and Practice, 25 (1999), no. 25, April/May, p. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. DSS, Social Security Statistics 1996 (London: HMSO, 1996), Table CI.01.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Deakin and F. Wilkinson, ‘Labour law, social security and economic i1nequality’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15 (1991), p. 125–148.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS), Reform of Social Security, Cm 9597, London: HMSO, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. Maclennam, Below the Limit, London: TUC, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  29. DHSS, Income During Sickness: A New Strategy, Cmnd 7684, London: HMSO, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maclennan, Below the Limit.

    Google Scholar 

  31. For discussion see H. Parker, Instead of the Dole. An enquiry into integration of the tax and benefit systems, London: Routledge, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  32. DSS, Income Related Benefits Estimates of Take-up 1997/98, London: HMSO, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  33. DSS, Social Security. Departmental Report 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. DSS, Family Credit Quarterly Statistics. July 1999, London: HMSO, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. DSS, Quarterly Statistics. September 1999, London: HMSO, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  36. E. Kempson, Life on a Low Income, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See Ogus, Barendt, and Wikeley, The Law of Social Security, p. 418–419.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ibid., eh. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See Deakin and Wilkinson, ‘Labour law, social security and economic inequality’.

    Google Scholar 

  40. DSS, Opportunity for all: Tackling poverty and social exclusion, Cm 4445, September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Office of National Statistics, Labour Force Survey, London: HMSO, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Le Grand, ‘The state of welfare’, in: J. Hills (Ed.) The State of Welfare. The Welfare State in Britain since 1974 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), p. 338–360, esp. p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See A. Goodman and S. Webb, ‘For richer, for poorer: the changing distribution of income in the UK, 1961–91’, in: Fiscal Studies, 15 (1994), no. 4, p. 29–62, and Inquiry into Income and Wealth, London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. DSS, Households with Below Average Incomes, London: HMSO, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Hannah Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Deakin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Catholic Study Centre, Catholic University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Joos P. A. van Vugt

  2. Wezenlaan 197, 6521 MP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Jan M. Peet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reed, H., Deakin, S. (2000). United Kingdom. In: van Vugt, J.P.A., et al. Social Security and Solidarity in the European Union. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57676-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57676-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1334-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57676-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation