Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Erste Erfahrungen aus der klinischen Testung der computerassistierten Pfannenpositionierung bei der Implantation von Hüft-Total-Endoprothesen mit dem NavitrackTM-System

  • Chapter
Verankerungsprinzipien in der Hüftendoprothetik

  • 61 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In der Endoprothetik ist die begrenzte Überlebenszeit der Endoprothesen ein nach wie vor ungelöstes Problem. Die häufigste Versagensursache ist die aseptische Lockerung, die ein multifaktorielles Geschehen darstellt 6,7,14,17. Polyethylenabrieb, Zementbruch, Fehlpositionierungen der Prothesenkomponenten und Prothesendesign bzw. Implantatmaterialien sind nur einige Faktoren, die mit der aseptischen Lockerung ursächlich in Zusammenhang gebracht werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abdel-Malek K, McGowan DP, Goel VK, Kowalski D, Smith SB (1997) Bone registration method for robot assisted surgery: pedicle screw insertion. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 211(3):221–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ackland MK, Boume WB, Uhthoff HK (1986) Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br May 68(3): 409–413

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS (1981) Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63-B(2):214–218

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine Mar 1; 25(5):606–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Yoder SA (1986) How definition of „loosening“ affects the incidence of loose total hip reconstructions. Clin Orthop Sep (210):185–191

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am Sep 67(7):1074–1085

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan DR, Ilstrup DM (1974) 2012 total hip arthroplasties. A study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am Mar 56(2):273–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Oct (355):8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goergen TG, Resnick D (1975) Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centring. Br J Radiol Apr 48(568):259–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson LG, Cassidy D (1995) Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty Jun 10(3): 369–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson G, Dolovich AT (1998) Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty Jan 13(1):80–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM 3rd, Blackwell M, Nikou C (1998) Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Sep (354):70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD (1979) Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am Jul 61(5):639–652

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L (1993) Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92675 operations performed 1978–1990. Acta Orthop Scand Oct 64(5):497–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M¨¹ller ME (1970) Total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Sep-Oct; 72:46–68

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br Mar 75(2):228–232

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C (1993) Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br Sep 75(5):697–704

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Richter M, Amiot LP, Neller S, Kluger P, Puhl W (2000) Computer-assisted surgery in posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine: an in vitro feasibility study. Eur Spine J Feb 9 Suppl 1:S65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B, Visarius H, Arm E, Langlotz F, Nolte LP, Ozdoba C (1997) Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine Feb 15; 22(4):452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas W, Schug M (1994) [Significance of the position of the endoprosthesis acetabular cup from the biomechanical and clinical viewpoint-recommendations for a classification]. Biomed Tech (Berl) Sep 39(9):222–226 (German)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, O’Gorman TW (1998) Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Mar (228): 79–87

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. T. Mattes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Puhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H.-P. Scharf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopädische Praxisklinik, München Airport, Terminalstr. 18 Mitte, München-Flughafen, 85356, Deutschland

    Roland Wetzel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mattes, T., Puhl, W., Scharf, HP. (2001). Erste Erfahrungen aus der klinischen Testung der computerassistierten Pfannenpositionierung bei der Implantation von Hüft-Total-Endoprothesen mit dem NavitrackTM-System. In: Wetzel, R. (eds) Verankerungsprinzipien in der Hüftendoprothetik. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57635-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57635-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63319-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57635-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation