Abstract
When the process distribution is non-normal, traditional Shewhart charts may not be applicable. A common practice in such cases is to normalize the process data by applying the Box-Cox power transformation. The general effectiveness of this transformation implies that an inverse normalizing transformation (INT) may also be effective, namely: a power transformation of the standard normal quantile may deliver good representation for the original process data without the need to transform them. Using the Box-Cox transformation as a departure point, three INTs have recently been developed and their effectiveness demonstrated. In this paper we adapt one of these transformations to develop new schemes for process control when the underlying process distribution is non-normal. The adopted transformation has three parameters, and these are identified either by matching of the median, the mean and the standard deviation (Procedure I),or by matching of the median, the mean and the mean of the log (of the original monitoring statistic; Procedure II). Given the low mean-squared-errors (MSEs) associated with sample estimates of these parameters, the new transformation may be used to derive control limits for non-normal populations without resorting to estimates of third and fourth moments, known for their notoriously high MSEs. Implementation of the new approach to monitor processes with non-normal distributions is demonstrated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bai, D. S., and Choi, I. S. (1995) “X and R control charts for skewed populations”. Journal of Quality Technology27(2)121–131
Balakrishnan, N., and Kocherlakota, S. (1986) “Effects of non-normality on X charts: Single assignable cause model”. Sankya.B 48439–444
Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964) “An analysis of transformations”. Journal of the Royal Statistical SocietyB26, 211–243
Burr, I. W. (1967) “The effect of non-normality on constants for X and R charts”. Industrial Quality Control.34563–569
Chan, L. K., Cheng, S. W., and Spiring, F. A. (1988) “The robustness of process capability index Cpto departure from normality”. In Statistical Theory and Data Analysis, II (K. Matusita, ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 223–229
Chan, L. K., Hapuarachchi, K. P., and Macpherson, B. D. (1988) “Robustness of X and R charts”. IEEE Transactions on Reliability.37117–123
Choobineh, F., and Ballard, J. L. (1987) “Control limits of QC charts for skewed distributions using weighted variance”. IEEE Transactions on Reliability.36473–477
Clements, J. A. (1989) “Process capability calculations for non-normal distributions”. Quality Progress.22 (2)49–55
Cornish, E. A., and Fisher, R. A. (1937:. “Moments and cumulants in the specification of distributions”. Review of the International Statistics Institute.5307
Ferrell, E. B. (1958) “Control charts for lognormal universe”. Industrial Quality Control154–6
Grimshaw, S. D., and Alt, F. B. (1997) “Control charts for quantile function values”. Journal of Quality Technology29 (1)1–7
Hunter, S. (1995) “Just what does an EWMA do?”. ASQC Statistics Division Newsletter16 (1)4–12
Kocherlakota, S., Kocherlakota, K., and Kirmani, S. N. U. A. (1992) “Process capability indices under non-normality”. International Journal of Mathematical Statistics 1
Kotz, S. and Johnson, N. L. (1993) Process Capability Indices. Book. Chapman and Hall, London
Montgomery, D. C. (1996) Introduction to statistical quality control. 31dEd., John Wiley & Sons
Nelson, R. P. (1979) “Control charts for Weibull processes with standards given”. IEEE Transactions on Reliability28283–287
Pearn, W. L., and Kotz, S. (1994) “Application of Clements’ method for calculating second-and third-generation process capability indices for non-normal Pearsonian populations”. Quality Engineering7 (1)139–145
Pignatiello, J. J., and Ramberg, J. S. (1993) “Process capability indices: Just say ”no“. Transactions of ASQC 47th Annual Quality Congress, 92–104
Runger, G. C., and Willemain, T. R. (1995) “Model-based and model-free control of autocorrelated processes”. Journal of Quality Technology27283–292
Schilling, E. G., and Nelson, P. R. (1976) “The effect of non-normality on the control limits of X charts”. Journal of Quality Technology8183–188
Shore, H. (1991): “New control limits that preserve the skewness of the monitoring statistic”. In The ASQC 45th Annual Quality Congress Transactions, 77–83
Shore, H. (1995a): “Fitting a distribution by the first two sample moments (partial and complete)”. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis19563
Shore, H. (1995b) “Some applications of a new two-moment distributional fitting procedure”. In the proceedings of The 13th International Conference on Production Research (August, 1995, Jerusalem). 704–706
Shore, H. (1996) “A new estimate of skewness with MSE smaller than that of the sample skewness”. Communications in Statistics (Simulation and Computation).25 (2)403–414
Shore, H. (1997) “Process capability analysis when data are autocorrelated”. Quality Engineering 9 (4), 615–626
Shore, H. (1998a) “Approximating an unknown distribution when distribution information is extremely limited”. Communications in Statistics (Simulation and Computation) 27 (2), 501–523
Shore, H. (1998b) “A new approach to analysing non-normal quality data with application to process capability analysis”. International Journal of Production Research 36 (7), 1917–1933
Shore, H. (1998c) “Inverse normalizing transformations and an extended normalizing transformation”. Submitted
Wheeler, D. J. (1991) “Shewhart’s charts: Myths, facts and competitors”. In The ASQC 45th Annual Quality Congress Transactions, 533–538
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shore, H. (2001). Process Control for Non-Normal Populations Based on an Inverse Normalizing Transformation. In: Lenz, HJ., Wilrich, PT. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 6. Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control, vol 6. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57590-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57590-7_12
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1374-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57590-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive