Skip to main content
Book cover

Compstat pp 183–188Cite as

Bagging Tree Classifiers for Glaucoma Diagnosis

  • Conference paper

Abstract

The aggregation of multiple unstable classifiers leads to substantial reduction of misclassification error in many applications and bench mark problems. We focus on the problem of classifying eyes as normal or glaucomatous based on measurements derived from laser scanning images of the optic nerve head. The performance of various aggregated classifiers is investigated for a clinical training sample and for a simulation model of eye morphologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Breiman, L. (1996a). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (1996b). Out-Of-Bag Estimation. Tech. rep., Statistics Department, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (1998). Arcing classifiers. The Annals of Statistics, 26(3), 801–824.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. (1997). Improvements on cross-validation: The 632+ bootstrap method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(438), 548–560.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberg Engineering (1997). Heidelberg Retina Tomograph: Bedienungsanleitung Software version 2.01. Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn, T. & Lausen, B. (2002). Bagging combined classifiers. In Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, Heidelberg. Proceedings IFCS (accepted), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka, R. & Gentlemen, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausen, B., Sauerbrei, W., & Schumacher, M. (1994). Classification and regression trees (CART) used for the exploration of prognostic factors measured on different scales. In Dirschedl, P. & Ostermann, R. (eds.), Computational Statistics, pp. 483–496, Heidelberg. Physica-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D. (1996). Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swindale, N. V., Stjepanovic, G., Chin, A., & Mikelberg, F. S. (2000). Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 41(7), 1730–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therneau, T. & Atkinson, E. (1997). An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning using the rpart Routine. Tech. Rep. 61, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hothorn, T., Lausen, B. (2002). Bagging Tree Classifiers for Glaucoma Diagnosis. In: Härdle, W., Rönz, B. (eds) Compstat. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57489-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57489-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1517-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57489-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics