Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: The Western Experience

  • David B. Audretsch
Part of the Technology, Innovation and Policy book series (3217, volume 14)

Abstract

The role that small firms play in economics has evolved considerably since the second world war. This paper seeks to document how and why small business plays a very different role in industrial organisation research today than it did some three decades ago.

Keywords

Europe Dine Sonal Univer Photography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Acs, Z. J.; Audretsch, D. B. (1988): Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review, 78 (4), September, pp. 678–690.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J.; Audretsch, D. B. (1990): Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. ADT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Technologie-und Gründerzentren e. V., Berlin) (1998): Ausgründungen technologieorientierter Unternehmen aus Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen. Report prepared for the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF).Google Scholar
  4. Almus, M.; Nerlinger, E. (1998b): Growth Determinants of New Technology-Based Firms: Empirical Results for West-Germany. Unpublished manuscript, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  5. Almus, M.; Nerlinger, E. (1998a): Beschäftigungsdynamik in jungen innovativen Unternehmen: Ergebnisse für West-Deutschland. ZEW Discussion Paper no. 98–09, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  6. Arrow, K. J. (1962): Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In Nelson, R. R. (Ed.): The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Princeton. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B. (1991): New Firm Survival and the Technological Regime. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, no. 3, August, pp. 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B. (1995): Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B.; Elston, J. A. (forthcoming): Does Firm Size Matter? Evidence on the Impacts of Liquidity Constraints on Investment Behaviour in Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organisation.Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B.; Elston, J. A. (1997): Financing the German Mittelstand. Small Business Economics, 9 (2), pp. 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B.; Feldman, M. P. (1996): R&D Spill `overs and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 3, June, pp. 630–640.Google Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B.; Fritsch, M. (1993): Betriebliche Turbulenz and regionale Beschäftigungsdynamik. Discussion Paper 93/7, Bergakademie Freiberg.Google Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B.; Fritsch, M. (1994): The Geography of Firm Births in Germany. Regional Studies, 28(4), pp. 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D. B.; Fritsch, M. (1996): Creative Destruction: Turbulence and Economic Growth in Germany. In: Heimstädter, E.; Perlman, M. (Eds.): Behavioural Norms, Technological Progress and Economic Dynamics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
  15. Audretsch, D. B.; Fritsch, M. (forthcoming): The Geographic and Industry Components of New Firm Start-ups in Germany. Review of Industrial Organisation.Google Scholar
  16. Audretsch, D. B.; Stephan, P. E. (1996): Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology. American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 3, June, pp. 641–652.Google Scholar
  17. Audretsch, D. B.; Thurik, R. (1999): Innovation, Industry Evolution and Employment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Audretsch, D. B.; Mahmood, T. (1995): New-Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 77, no. 1, February, pp. 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Audretsch, D. B. (1995): Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Audretsch, D. B. (1999): Mittelstandspolitik, Neugründungen und die Standortkrise. In: Welfens, P. (Ed.): Economic Globalisation, Innovation Dynamics and Labour Markets. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Baldwin, J. R. (1995): The Dynamics of Industrial Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Baldwin, J. R.; Rafiquzzaman, M. (1995): Selection versus Evolutionary Adaptation: Learning and Post-Entry Performance. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, vol. 13, no. 4, December, pp. 501–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Baldwin, J. R.; Gorecki, P. K. (1991): Entry, Exit, and Production Growth. In: Geroski, P.; Schwalbach, J. (Eds.): Entry and Market Contestability — An International Comparison. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Becher, G.; Wolff, H. (1995): Evaluation of the Promotion of R&D Cooperations of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. In: Becher, G.; Kuhlmann, S. (Eds.): Evaluation of Technology Policy Programmes in Germany. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Becher, G.; Kuhlmann, S. (1995, Eds.): Evaluation of Technology Policy Programmes in Germany. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Beise, M.; Licht, G. (1996): Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Unpublished manuscript. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim, January.Google Scholar
  27. Berger, G.; Nerlinger, E. (1997): Regionale Verteilung von Unternehmensgründungen in der Informationstechnik: Empirische Ergebnisse für Westdeutschland. In: Harhoff, D. (Ed.): Unternehmensgründungen- Empirische Analysen für die alten und neuen Bundesländer. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 151–186.Google Scholar
  28. Berger, J.; Domeyer, V.; Funder, M. (1990, Eds.): Kleinbetriebe im wirtschaftlichen Wandel. Berlin: Campus.Google Scholar
  29. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), (1996): Bundesbericht Forschung 1996, Bonn.Google Scholar
  30. Bögenhold, D. (1985): Die neuen Selbständigen. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Brown, Ch.; Hamilton, J.; Medoff, J. (1990): Employers Large and Small. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Brüderl, J.; Preisendörfer, P. (1998): Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Businesses. Small Business Economics, 10 (3), pp. 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Burgel, O.; Murray, G.; Fier, A.; Licht, G.; Nerlinger, E. (1998): The Internationalisation of Britisch and German Start-up Companies in High-Technology Industries. Unpublished manuscript. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  34. Cayrol, P. (1993): Big Blues: The Unmaking of IBM. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Caves, R. E. (1998): Industrial Organisation and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 36, no. 4, December, pp. 1947–1982.Google Scholar
  36. Chandler, A. D. Jr. (1977): The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Coase, R. H.(1937): The Nature of the Firm. Economica, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cringley, R. X. (1993): Accidental Empires. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  39. Deeg, R. (1998): What Makes German Banks Different? Small Business Economics, 10(2), pp. 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dunne, T.; Roberts, M. J.; Samuelson, L. (1989): The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 104, pp. 671–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Egeln, J.; Licht, G.; Steil, F. (1997): Firm Foundations and the Role of Financial Constraints. Small Business Economics, 9 (2), pp. 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Eisinger, P. (1990): Do the American States do Industrial Policy? British Journal of Political Science, 20, vol. 20, October, pp. 509–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Feldman, M. P.; Pfiiunann, O. (1998): Bio-Entrepreneurship in the U.S. and Germany. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  44. Feller, I. (1997): Federal and State Government Roles in Science and Technology. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(4), pp. 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fritsch, M.; Audretsch, D. B. (1995): Betriebliche Turbulenz and regionale Beschäftigungsdynamik. In: Semlinger, K.; Frick, B.: Betriebliche Modernisierung in personeller Erneuerung. Berlin: Edition sigma, pp. 59–74.Google Scholar
  46. Fritsch, M. (1993): The Role of Small Firms in West Germany. In: Acs, Z. J.; Audretsch, D. B. (Eds.): Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–54.Google Scholar
  47. Fritsch, M. (1997): New Firms and Regional Employment Change. Small Business Economics, 9(5), pp. 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Galbraith, J. K. (1956): American Capitalism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  49. Geroski, P. A. (1991): Some Data-Driven Reflections on the Entry Process. In: Georski, P.; Schwalbach, J. (Eds.): Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 282–286.Google Scholar
  50. Geroski, P. A. (1995): What do we know about Entry. International Journal of Industrial Organisation (Special Issue on The Post Entry Performance of Firms; Audretsch, D. B.; Mata, J. Eds.), vol. 13, no. 4, December, pp. 421–440.Google Scholar
  51. Geroski, P. A.; Schwalbach, J. (1991, Eds.): Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Graaf, J. de V. (1957): Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Griliches, Z. (1979): Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(Spring), pp. 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hall, B. H. (1987): The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35 (June), pp. 583–605.Google Scholar
  55. Hannan, M. T.; Freeman, J. (1989): Organisational Ecology Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Harhoff, D. (1997, Ed.): Unternehmensgründungen: Empirische Analysen für die alten und neuen Bundesländer. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  57. Harhoff, D.; Steil, F. (1997): Die ZEW-Gründungspanels: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen und Analysepotential. In: Harhoff, D. (Ed.): Unternehmensgründungen: Empirische Analysen für die alten und neuen Bundesländer. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 11–28.Google Scholar
  58. Harhoff, D.; Licht, G. (1996): Innovationsaktivitäten kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  59. Harhoff, D.; Stahl, K. (1995): Unternehmens-und Beschäftigungsdynamik in Westdeutschland: Zum Einfluss von Haftungsregeln und Eigentümerstruktur. In: Oppenländer, K. H. (Ed.): Industrieökonomik und Finanzmärkte. ifo Studien, 41, pp.17–50.Google Scholar
  60. Hirschman, A. O. (1970): Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Hughes, A. (1997): Finance for SMEs: A U.K. Perspective. Small Business Economics, 9(2), April, pp. 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ijiri, Y.; Simon, H. A. (1977): Skew Distributions and Sizes of Business Firms. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  63. Jovanovic, B. (1982): Selection and Evolution of Industry. Econometrica, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Justman, M.; Teubal, M. (1986): Innovation Policy in an Open Economy: A Normative Framework to Strategic and Tactical Issues. Research Policy, 15, pp. 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Justman, M. (1995): Infrastructure, Growth and the Two Dimensions of Industrial Policy. Review of Economic Studies, 62 (1), January, pp. 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Knight, F. H. (1921): Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  67. Kulicke, M. (1987): Technologieorientierte Unternehmen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Strukturbildungs-und Wachstumsphase von Neugründungen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  68. Kuntze, U.; Hornschild, K. (1995): Evaluation of the Promotion of R&D Activities in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. In: Becher, G.; Kuhlmann, S. (1995, Eds.): Evaluation of Technology Policy Programmes in Germany. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Licht, G.; Nerlinger, E. (1997): Junge innovative Unternehmen in Europa: Ein internationaler Vergleich. In: Harhoff, D. (1997, Ed.): Unternehmensgründungen: Empirische Analysen für die alten und neuen Bundesländer, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
  70. Licht, G.; Nerlinger, E.; Berger, G. (1995): Germany: NTBF Literature Review. ZEW, Mannheim.Google Scholar
  71. Link A. (1995): A Generosity of Spirit. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Loveman, G.; Sengenberger, W. (1991): The Re-emergence of Small-Scale Production: An International Comparison. Small Business Economics, 3(1), pp. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mansfield, E. (1962): Entry, Gibrat’s Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms. American Economic Review, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1023–1051.Google Scholar
  74. Manz, T. (1990): Innovationsprozesse in Klein-und Mittelbetrieben. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  75. Mata, J. (1994): Firm Growth During Infancy. Small Business Economics 6(1), pp. 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mata, J.; Portugal, P. (1994): Life Duration of new Firms. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27 (3), pp. 227–246.Google Scholar
  77. Mata, J.; Portugal, P.; Guimaraes, P. (1995): The Survival of New Plants: Start-Up Conditions and Post-Entry Evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organisation 13(4), December, pp. 459–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1993, Ed.): Innovationsökonomie und Technologiepolitik, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
  79. Moore, J. H. (1992): Measuring Soviet Economic Growth: Old Problems and New Complications. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 148(1), pp. 72–92.Google Scholar
  80. Nelson, R. R.; Winter, S. G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Nerlinger, E. (1998): Standorte und Entwicklung junger innovativer Unternehmen: Empirische Ergebnisse für West-Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  82. Neumann, M. (1993): Review of Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison. International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 593–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Palfreman, J.; Swade, D. (1991): The Dream Machine: Exploring the Computer Age. London: BBC Books.Google Scholar
  84. Pfirrmann, O.; Wupperfeld, U.; Lerner, J. (1997): Venture Capital and New Tech-nology Based Firms: A US-German Comparison. Berlin: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pfii uuann, O. (1994): The Geography of Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Firms in West Germany. Small Business Economics, 6 (1), pp. 27–41.Google Scholar
  86. Picot, A.; Laub, U. D.; Scheider, D. (1989): Innovative Unternehmensgründungen: Eine ökonomisch-empirische Analyse. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  87. Pratten, C. F. (1971): Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Saxenian, A. (1990): Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 33 (1), pp. 89–111.Google Scholar
  89. Scherer, F. M. (1976): Industrial Structure, Scale Economies, and Worker Alienation. In: Robert T. M.; David Qualls P. (Eds.): Essays on Industrial Organisation in Honour of Joe S. Bain. Cambridge: Ballinger, pp. 105–122.Google Scholar
  90. Scherer, F. M. (1991): Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem. In: Acs, Z. J.; Audretsch, D. B. (Eds.): Innovation and Technological Change. An International Comparison. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 24–38.Google Scholar
  91. Schumpeter, J. A. (1911): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
  92. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  93. Schwalbach, J. (1989): Small Business in German Manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 1 (2), pp. 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schwalbach, J. (1990): Small Business in German Manufacturing. In: Acs, Z. J.; Audretsch, D. B. (Eds.): The Economics of Small Firms: A European Challenge. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 63–73.Google Scholar
  95. Schwalbach, J. (1994): Small Business Dynamics in Europe. Small Business Economics, 6 (1), pp. 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Simon, H. A.; Bonini, Ch. P. (1958): The Size Distribution of Business Firms. American Economic Review, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 607–617.Google Scholar
  97. Steil, F. (1997): Unternehmensgründungen in Ostdeutschland. In: Harhoff, D. (Ed.): Unternehmensgründungen: Empirische Analysen für die alten und neuen Bundesländer. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 29–72.Google Scholar
  98. Sternberg, R. (1990): The Impact of Innovation Centres on Small Technology-Based Firms: The Example of the Federal Republic of Germany. Small Business Economics, 2 (2), pp. 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sternberg, R. (1996): Technology Policies and the Growth of Regions: Evidence from Four Countries. Small Business Economics, 8 (2), pp. 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stockmann, R.; Leicht, R. (1994): The Pattern of Changes in the Long-Term Development of Establishment Size. Small Business Economics, 6 (6), pp. 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sutton, J. 1997): Gibrat’s Legacy. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 40–59.Google Scholar
  102. Tyson, L. D. Andrea, Petrin, T., Rogers, H. (1994): Promoting Entrepreneurship in Eastern Europe. Small Business Economics, 6 (3), June, pp. 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vitols, S. (1998): Are German Banks Different? Small Business Economics, 10 (2), pp. 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wagner, J. 1992): Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Persistence of Chance: Testing Gibrat’s Law with Establishment Data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989. Small Business Economics, 4 (2), pp. 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wagner, J. (1994): Small Firm Entry in Manufacturing Industries: Lower Saxony, 1979–1989. Small Business Economics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wagner, J. (1992): Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Persistence of Chance: Testing Gibrat’s Law with Establishment Data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989. Small Business Economics, 4 (2), pp. 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wagner, J. 1995a): Exports, Firm Size, and Firm Dynamics. Small Business Economics, 7 (1), pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wagner, J. 1995b): Firm Size and Job Creation in Germany. Small Business Economics, 7 (6), pp. 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wagner, J. (1997): Firm Size and Job Quality: A Survey of the Evidence from Germany. Small Business Economics, 9 (5), pp. 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Weigand, C. (1998): Der Einfluss der Bankkreditvergabe auf den Unternehmenswettbewerb. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
  111. Weigand, J. (1996): Innovationen, Wettbewerb und Konjunktur. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
  112. Weiss, L. W. (1979): The Structure-Performance Paradigm and Antitrust. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127 (April), pp. 1104–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Williamson, O. E. (1975): Markets and Hierarchies: Antitrust Analysis and Implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  114. Williamson, O. E. (1968): Economies as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs. American Economic Review, 58 (1), pp. 18–36.Google Scholar
  115. Winter, S. G. (1984): Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, vol. 5, September-December, pp. 287–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David B. Audretsch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations