Employment impacts of cleaner production: theory, methodology and results

  • Matteo Bartolomeo
  • René Kemp
  • Klaus Rennings
  • Thomas Zwick
Part of the ZEW Economic Studies book series (ZEW, volume 21)


In Europe, the protection of the environment has become an important business goal. Given the continuing high level of unemployment, the question arises whether further efforts for cleaner production may lead to a change in unemployment and if so, under which conditions. Both politicians and scientists search for strategies which help to further enhance the quality of the environment and at the same time increase employment (Bovenberg and van der Ploeg, 1994,Goodstein, 1995).


Life Cycle Assessment Clean Production Service Innovation Employment Effect Substitution Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bovenberg A. L. and F. Van der Ploeg (1994), Consequences of Environmental Tax Reform for Involuntary Unemployment and Welfare. Center for Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 94/08.Google Scholar
  2. Brouwer, E., A. Kleinknecht and J. Reijnen (1993), Employment Growth and Innovation at the Firm Level — An Empirical Study, Evolutionary Economics 3, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chennels, L. and J. Van Reenen (1999), Technical Change and the Structure of Employment and Wages: A Survey of the Micro-Economic Evidence, Working Paper 99123, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
  4. Cleff, T. and K. Rennings (1999), Determinants of Environmental Product and Process Innovation — Evidence From the Mannheim Innovation Panel and a Follow-Up Telephone Survey. in. H. Karl and C. Orwat (Eds.), European Environment, Special issue on Integrated Product Policy. Vol. 9, No. 5, 191–201.Google Scholar
  5. Coenen, R. et al. (1995), TA-Projekt Umwelttechnik und wirtschafliche Entwicklung: Integrierte Umweltiechnik Chancen erkennen und nutzen, TAB (Biro far TechnikFoigenabschatzung beim Deutschen Bundestag), Arbeitsbericht 35, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  6. Conrad, K. and T. Schmidt (1997), Double Dividend of Climate Protection and the Role of International Policy Coordination in the EU — An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis with the GEM-ES Model, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 97–26.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (1993), White Paper on “Growth, Competitiveness and Employment” No. 145, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (1997), Communication on Environment and Employment. Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. European Environmental Agency (1997), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A Guide to Approaches. Experiences and Information Sources, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  10. Fuzzier, C. (1996). Driving Eco-innonovation. London.Google Scholar
  11. Gameson et al (1997), Environment and Employment — A report prepared try the IPTS for the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection of the European Parliament, Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
  12. Goodstein E. (1995), Jobs or the Environment? No Trade-Off, Challenge No. 01–02, 41–45.Google Scholar
  13. König, H. (1997), Innovation und Beschäftigung, in: Vosgerau, H. and H. König (Eds.), Zentrum und Peripherie - Zur Entwicklung der Arbeitsteilung in Europa, Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Vol. 250, Berlin, 149–176.Google Scholar
  14. König, H., H. Buscher and G. Licht (1995), Investment, Employment and Innovation, in: OECD (Ed.), Investment. Productivity and Innovation, Paris, 67.84.Google Scholar
  15. Käppi, A. and C. Pichl (1997), Wettbewerbsvorteile durch umweltorientierte Innovationen. Űberprrïfung der First-Mover-These, Umwelt und Arbeit If, Informationen zur Umweltpolitik Nr. 122 der Arbeitskammer Wien.Google Scholar
  16. Kosz, M. (1997), Integrierter Umwelschuiz und Arbeit. Erste Erfahrungen und langfristige Perspektiven, Umwelt und Arbeit III. Informationen zur Umweltpolitik Nr. 123, Institut fOr Wirtschaft und Umwelt der Arbeitskammer Wien.Google Scholar
  17. Pfeiffer, F. (1999), Human Capital and Innovation in Eastern and Western Germany, in: M. Fritsch and H. Brezinski (Eds.), Innovation and Technological Change in Eastern Europe, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 142–166.Google Scholar
  18. Pfeiffer, F. and K. Rennings (2001), Employment Impacts of Cleaner Production - Evidence from a German Study Using Case Studies and Surveys. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 10, No. 3, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Porter, M.E. and C. van der Linde (1995), Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate, Harvard Business Review Vol. 73, No. 5, 120–134.Google Scholar
  20. Ritt, T., H. Mahringcr, M. Geizher and O. Fitz (2000), Umwelt und Beschäftigung: Strategien für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung und deren Auswirkungen auf die Beschiifligung, institut fair Wirtschaft und Umwelt der Arbeitskammer Wien, Vienna.Google Scholar
  21. Rin, T. (1999), Integrierter UmWeltschutz: Enttëuschend gut! UmweltWirtschaftsForum, Vol. 7, No 2, 24–28.Google Scholar
  22. Rohmann, H. and M. Ruschinski (1998), The Labour Demand and the Innovation Behaviour of Firms- An Empirical Investigation for West German Manufacturing Firms, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik Vol. 217, No- 6, 741–752.Google Scholar
  23. Smolny, W. and T. Schneeweis (1999), Innovation, Wachstum und Beschäftigung - Eine empirische Untersuchung auf der Basis des ifo Untemehmenspanels, Jahrbr’tcher fur Nationalökonomie und Statistik Vol. 218, No. 3+4, 453–472.Google Scholar
  24. Van Remen, J. (1997), Employment and Technological Innovation: Evidence from U.K. Manufacturing Firms, Journal of Labor Economics Vol. 15, 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vergragt, P. J. and L. Jansen (1993), Sustainable Technological Development: the Making of a Dutch Long-Term Oriented Technology Programme, Project Appraisal, Vol. 8, No. 3, 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weizsäcker, E. U. von, A. B. Lovins and H. L. Lovins (1995), Faktor 4 - Doppelter Wohlstand, halbierter Naturverbrauch, Mtlnchen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matteo Bartolomeo
    • 1
  • René Kemp
    • 2
  • Klaus Rennings
    • 3
  • Thomas Zwick
    • 3
  1. 1.Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)MilanoItaly
  2. 2.Maastricht Economic Research Institue on Innovation and Technology (MERIT)MaastrichtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW)MannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations