Skip to main content

Abstract

People terminally ill are at their most vulnerable. Whether conscious or unconscious, they are dependant on health practitioners and others, e.g. relatives or friends. The issue of the autonomy of the person, by no means settled in relation to fully competent and healthy individuals, in the case of terminally ill patients becomes acute. Civil law works mainly with a concept of an average person, of average competences and faculties and average values, needs and desires. Such ideal persons are the core of Law’s anthropological model, and the entire range of regulation by the Civil law of personal and other matters (Law of Persons, Obligations, Succession, Property and so on) is designed on the basis of this model. Persons that veer significantly from the model, from Jehovah’s witnesses to children, to mentally retarded or handicapped, or people unconscious or in a vegetative state, are still, at the dawn of the third millennium, handled with unease and suspicion by our Civil laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

F. Select Bibliography

  • • BRAZIER, M., Medicine, Patients and the Law, 2nd ed. 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • • DUGDALE, A.,& STANTON, K., Professional Negligence, 3rd ed. 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • • GRUBB, A., Choices and Decisions in Health Care, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • • GRUBB, A. — Decision-Making and Problems of Incompetence, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • • GRUBB, A. —’ Problems of Medical Law’ in MARKESINIS, B.,S.,& DEAKIN S.,F., Tort Law, 4th ed. 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • • HARRIS J., Clones, Genes and Immortality, 2nd ed. 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • • HOGGETT, B., Mental Health Law, 4th ed. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • • JONES, M, Medical Negligence, 2nd ed. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • • KENNEDY I., Treat Me Right: Essays in Medical Law and Ethics, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • • Kennedy I. —& Grubb, A., Medical Law: Text and Materials, 2nd ed. 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy I. —& GRUBB, A., (eds.) Principles of Medical Law, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • KEOWN, J., (ed.) Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspectives, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • • LEE R.,& MORGAN D., Death Rites: Law and Ethics at the End of Life, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • LOCKWOOD M., (ed.) Modern Dilemmas in Modern Medicine, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • • McHALE J., FOX M.,& MURPHY J., Health Care Law: Text and Materials, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • • MASON J. K.,& McCALL SMITH R., A., Law and Medical Ethics, 5th ed. 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • • MONTGOMERY J., Health Care Law, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • • NEWDICK C., Who should we Treat? Law, Patients and Resources in the NHS, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • • OTLOWSKI, M., Voluntary Euthanasia and the Common Law, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • • SKEGG P. D. G., Law, Ethics and Medicine, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • • TEFF H., Reasonable Care: Legal Perspectives on the Doctor/Patient Relationship 1994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Banakas, E.K. (2000). Country Report England. In: Taupitz, J. (eds) Zivilrechtliche Regelungen zur Absicherung der Patientenautonomie am Ende des Lebens / Regulations of Civil Law to Safeguard the Autonomy of Patients at the End of Their Life. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57256-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57256-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67705-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57256-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics