Multiple Attribute Probabilistic Assessment of the Performance of Some Airlines

  • Alan Jessop
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 507)


Organisations are increasingly ranked according to their performance. This is usually done by some third party for general consumption. Two considerations then become important: first, that those making the ranking wish to appear to be doing so as objectively as possible; second, that it is desirable that the rationale for the relative performance measures are transparent and easily appreciated by the non-expert consumer.

A simple weighted sum of attributes provides a measure that is easy to explain but there remains the “problem of weight determination. In other circumstances equivocation over the determination of parameter values is addressed via risk analysis. It is argued that it is similarly meaningful to give probability distributions for the values of weights. Consequently, it will not always be possible to discriminate between organisations and so some idea of clustering is more appropriate than ranking. Multidimensional Scaling may be used to present visually the dispositions of organisations according to the degree to which their relative performances are significantly different and performance clusters thereby determined.

The method is illustrated by application to thirty international airlines.


Multidimensional Scaling Data Envelopment Analysis Model Multiple Criterion Decision Entropy Weight Relative Performance Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen P and Pelersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 39: 1261–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabie P, Boonnan SA, Levitt PR (1978) Constructing bloekmodels: how and why. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 17: 21–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyssou D. (1999) Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks. Journal of the Operational Research Society 50: 974–978.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke D, Rivett PBH (1978) A structural mapping approach to complex decision-making. Journal of the Operational Research Society 29: 113–128.Google Scholar
  5. Jessop A. (1999a) A Multiattribute Assessment of Airport Performance. 25th. Euro Working Group on Financial Modelling, Institut für Finanzierung und Finanzmärkte, Vienna.Google Scholar
  6. Jessop A (1999b) Entropy in multiattribute problems. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 8:61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kruskal JP (1967) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness-of-fit to a non-metric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mar Molinero C. Apellaniz Gomez P. SerrancoCinca C (1996) A multivariate study of Spanish bond ratings. Omega 24: 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mar Molinero C, Ezzamel M (1991) Multidimensional scaling applied to corporate failure. Omega 19: 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mar Molinero C, Qing M (1990) Decision support systems for university undergraduate admissions. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41:219–228.Google Scholar
  11. Pedraja-Chaparro P, Salinas-Jimenez J, Smith P (1999) On the quality of the data envelopment analysis model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 50: 636–644.Google Scholar
  12. Rivett PBH (1977) Multidimensional scaling for multiobjective policies. Omega 5: 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rivett PBH (1980) Indifference mapping for multiple criteria decisions. Omega 8: 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roll Y, Golany B (1993) Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA. Omega 21: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schefczyk M (1993) Operational performance of airlines: an extension of traditional management paradigms. Strategic Management Journal. 14: 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scott J (2000) Social Network Analysis. London, Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Tofallis C (1997) Input efficiency profiling: an application to airlines. Computers and Operational Research 24: 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Jessop
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Durham Business SchoolDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations