Advertisement

Abstract

Virtually all of the PIEs examined by EUREX fall into five subject domains. GEMINI, the consortium partner for Italy, was responsible for the domain classified as Testing, Verification, Validation, and Quality Management, consisting of 88 PIEs performed throughout Europe between 1994 and 1997.

Keywords

Testing Process Software Quality Testing Tool Software Verification Test Execution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Myers78]
    Glenford J. Myers, The Art of Software Testing, Wiley-Interscience., 1978Google Scholar
  2. [Ghezzi91]
    Ghezzi, Fuggetta, Morasca, Morzenti, Pezzè, Ingeneria del Software, Mondadori Informatica, 1991Google Scholar
  3. [Perry95]
    William Perry, Effective Methods for Software Testing, Wiley, 1995Google Scholar
  4. [Cusumano95]
    M. Cusumano and R. Selby, Microsoft Secrets, Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [Dyer92]
    Michael Dyer, The Cleanroom Approach to Quality Software Development, Wiley, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. [Friedman95]
    M. Friedman and J. Voas, Software Assessment: Reliability, Safety, Testability, Wiley, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [Kaner93]
    C. Kaner, J. Falk, and H.Q. Nguyen, Testing Computer Software (2/e), Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. [Kaner96a]
    Cem Kaner, “Negotiating Testing Resources: A Collaborative Approach,” a position paper for the panel session on “How to Save Time and Money in Testing”, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Quality Week (Software Research, San Francisco, CA), 1996. (http://www.kaner.com/negotiate.htm)Google Scholar
  9. [Kaner96b]
    Cem Kaner, “Software Negligence & Testing Coverage,” in Proceedings of STAR 96, (Software Quality Engineering, Jacksonville, FL), 1996. (http://www.kaner.com/coverage.htm)Google Scholar
  10. [Lyu96]
    Michael R. Lyu (ed.), Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering, McGraw-Hill, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. [Marick95]
    Brian Marick, The Craft of Software Testing, Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. [Marick97]
    Brian Marick, “The Test Manager at the Project Status Meeting,” in Proceedings of the Tenth International Quality Week (Software Research, San Francisco, CA), 1997. (http://www.stlabs.com/~marick/root.htm)Google Scholar
  13. [McConnell96]
    Steve McConnell, Rapid Development, Microsoft Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. [Moore91]
    Geoffrey A. Moore, Crossing the Chasm, Harper Collins, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. [Moore95]
    Geoffrey A. Moore, Inside the Tornado, Harper Collins, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. [Musa87]
    J. Musa, A. Iannino, and K. Okumoto, Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application, McGraw-Hill, 1987.Google Scholar
  17. [Nielsen93]
    Jakob Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Academic Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  18. [Pettichord96]
    Brett Pettichord, “Success with Test Automation,” in Proceedings of the Ninth International Quality Week (Software Research, San Francisco, CA), 1996. (http://www.io.com/~wazmo/succpap.htm)Google Scholar
  19. [Rothman96]
    Johanna Rothman, “Measurements to Reduce Risk in Product Ship Decisions,” in Proceedings of the Ninth International Quality Week (Software Research, San Francisco, CA), 1996. (http://world.std.com/~jr/Papers/QW96.html)Google Scholar
  20. [Voas91]
    J. Voas, L. Morell, and K. Miller, “Predicting Where Faults Can Hide from Testing,” IEEE Software, March, 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Consolini
    • 1
  1. 1.GEMINIBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations