Skip to main content

Chaos, Computability, Determinism, and Freedom: A Critical Analysis from a System-Theoretic Point of View

  • Chapter
Integrative Systems Approaches to Natural and Social Dynamics
  • 183 Accesses

Abstract

First, a résumé of modern chaos research is given which clarifies the epistemological implications of “deterministic chaos”. Second, I will explicate which type of concept of freedom seems to be the most plausible to me. For this purpose I will briefly explicate my philosophical premises, then I will justify why I think that attempts to justify “freedom” on the grounds of chaos research and quantum theory are not convincing. Finally, I will discuss the basic aspects of a system-theoretic determination model of “action-decision-freedom”, which allows for the compatibility of “freedom” and “determinism”, for integrating important criteria of rational decision processes, for grasping intuitive aspects of the subjective“experience of freedom”, and for letting “action-decision-freedom” become an object of empirical investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Batterman RW (1996) Chaos: algorithmic complexity vs dynamical instability. In: Wein- gartner P, Schurz G (eds) Law and prediction in the light of chaos research. Lecture Notes in Physics vol 273. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 211 -235

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blum L, Cucker F, Shub M, Smale S (1997) Complexity and real computation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremermann HJ (1977) Complexity and transcomputability. In: Duncan R, Weston-Smith M (eds) The encyclopedia of ignorance. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzug T (1994) Analyse chaotischer Systeme. Mannheim, B.I.-Wissenschaftsverlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Coven E, Kan I, Yorke JA (1988) Pseudo-orbit shadowing in the family of tent maps. Trans Am Math Soc 308: 227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1998) Sind Affen Rechtshänder? Notizhefte M (1838) und N (1838) und die “Biographische Skizze eines Kindes” (1839/76). Friedenauer Presse, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner D (1996) Der freie Wille und die Selbstreflexion. In: von Cranach M, Foppa K (eds) Freiheit des Entscheidens und Handelns. Ein Problem der nomologischen Psychologic Heidelberg, Asanger, pp 125–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckmann JP, Ruelle D (1992) Fundamental limitations for estimating dimensions and Lyapunov exponents in dynamical systems. Physica D56: 185

    Google Scholar 

  • Grush R, Churchland P (1996) Lücken im Penrose-Parkett. In: Metzinger T (ed) Bewusstsein. Beiträge aus der Gegenwartsphilosophie. Schöningh, Paderborn, pp 221–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantz H, Olbrich E (1997) Scalar observations from a class of high-dimensional chaotic systems: limitations of the time delay embedding. Chaos 7: 423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantz H, Schreiber T (1999) Nonlinear time series analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalik ZJ, Leiber T (1999) Biomedizinische Zeitreihen: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. In: Mainzer K (ed) Komplexe Systeme und Nichtlineare Dynamik in Natur und Gesellschaft. Komplexitätsforschung in Deutschland auf dem Weg ins nächste Jahrhundert. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 223–246 (http://www.phil.uni-augsburg.de/dgksnd/)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (1996 a) Kosmos, Kausalität und Chaos. Naturphilosophische, erkenntnistheoretische und wissenschaftstheoretische Perspektiven. Ergon, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (1996b) Chaos, Berechnungskomplexität und Physik: Neue Grenzen wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis? Phil Nat 33: 23–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (1998a) On the actual impact of deterministic chaos. Synthese 113: 357–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (1998b) On the impact of deterministic chaos on modern science and philosophy of science. Implications for the philosophy of technology? Techné (Quart Electr J) 4: 23–50 (http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v4_n2pdf/leiber.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (1999 a) Deterministic chaos and computational complexity: the case of methodological complexity reductions. J Gen Phil Sci 30: 87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (1999b) Freiheit, Wille und Determinismus: Vom philosophischen Evergreen zum wissenschaftlichen Forschungsprogramm. EuS 10: 307–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (2000 a) Vom mechanistischen Weltbild zur Selbstorganisation des Lebens. Helm-holtz’ und Boltzmanns Forschungsprogramme und ihre Bedeutung für Physik, Chemie, Biologie und Philosophic Alber, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (2000b) Determinismus, Chaos und Berechenbarkeit. Epistemologisch relevante Aspekte. Hōrin 7: 23–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiber T (2001) Ethik-Theorie und Ökologie-Ethik: Grundbegriffe, Begründungsstrukturen und Argumente. (work in progress)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg AJ, Liebermann MA (1983) Regular and stochastic motion. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olbrich E, Kantz H (1997) Inferring chaotic dynamics from time series: on which length scale determinism becomes visible. Phys Lett A232: 63 - 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Peitgen H-O, Jürgens H, Saupe D (1994) Chaos - Bausteine der Ordnung. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose R (1994 a) Mechanisms, microtubules and the mind. J Consc Stud 1: 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose R (1994 b) Shadows of the mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose R, Hameroff S (1995) What gaps? J Consc Stud 2: 99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine WvO (1987) Quiddities. An intermittently philosophical dictionary. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1979) Gesetzlichkeit, psychophysischer Zusammenhang, Willensfreiheit und Ethik.Duncker und Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle D (1990) Deterministic chaos: The science and the fiction. Proc Roy Soc (London) A427: 241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber H-L (1994) Rechtliche Grundlagen der psychiatrischen Begutachtung. In: Venzlaff U, Foerster K (eds) Psychiatrische Begutachtung. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 3–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber T, Kantz H (1995) Noise in chaotic data: diagnosis and treatment. Chaos 5:133 –142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster P (1999) Beherrschung von Komplexität in der molekularen Evolution. In: Mainzer K (ed) Komplexe Systeme und Nichtlineare Dynamik in Natur und Gesellschaft. Komplexitätsforschung in Deutschland auf dem Weg ins nächste Jahrhundert. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 117– 145 (http://www.phil.uni-augsburg.de/dgksnd/)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal A, Bricmont J (1998) Fashionable nonsense. Postmodern abuse of science. Picador,New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H, Leiber T (1994) Determinismus und Chaos in der Physik. In: Mainzer K,Schirmacher W (eds) Quanten, Chaos und Dämonen. Erkenntnistheoretische Aspekte der modernen Physik. B.I.-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, pp 147–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend JT, Busemeyer JR (1995) Dynamic representation of decision making. In: Port R,van Gelder T (eds) Mind as motion. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), pp 101 - 120

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub JF, Woźniakowski H (1991) Theory and applications of information-based complexity.In: Nadel L, Stein D (eds) 1990 Lectures in complex systems (Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Lecture, vol III). Addison-Wesley, Redwood City (CA), pp 163–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter H (1998) Neurophilosophie der Willensfreiheit. Von libertarischen Illusionen zum Konzept natürlicher Autonomie. Schöningh, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q (1991) The global solution of the N-body problem. Cel Mech Dyn Astr 50: 73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White I (1988) The limits and capabilities of machines. A review. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyb 18:917–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leiber, T. (2001). Chaos, Computability, Determinism, and Freedom: A Critical Analysis from a System-Theoretic Point of View. In: Matthies, M., Malchow, H., Kriz, J. (eds) Integrative Systems Approaches to Natural and Social Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56585-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56585-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62526-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56585-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics