Skip to main content

An Empirically Based Approach to Self-Organization in Forest Ecosystems

  • Chapter

Abstract

The concept of synergetics is applied to forest ecosystem theory in order to bridge the current gap to forestry and land-use planning. Forest ecosystem types are introduced as statistical ensembles populating the basins of attraction of natural and man-made forests in multidimensional ecological state spaces. Ecosystem types can be considered as elementary units of a holistic approach to ecosystems. A universally applicable formalism is developed to derive, to model, and to visualize forest ecosystem types from an ecological data set. A series of natural and artificial forest ecosystem types of the Northeast German lowlands is modeled in an ecogram in dependence on nutrient and water supply status. The practical applications of the presented approach are discussed finally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anders S, Hofmann G, Unger S (1988) Quantifizierung der Leistungspotenz natürlicher Standortsproduktivkräfte für die Rohholzerzeugung anhand ökologischer Ertragsmodelle- dargestellt am Beispiel natürlicher Buchenwälder des unteren Berglandes. Beitr. Forst-wirtsch.19:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubreville AMA (1938) La foret coloniale: Les forets de l’Afrique occidentale francaise. Ann Acad Sci Colon 9:1–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy L v. (1968) General system theory: foundation, development, application. Braziller,New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann FH, Likens GE (1979) Pattern and process of a forested ecosystem. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cajander AK (1909) Über Waldtypen. Acta Forest Fenn 1: 1 -175

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE (1916) Plant succession: analysis of the development of vegetation. Publ Carnegie Inst Washington 242: 1–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling W, Feistel R. (1986) Physik der Selbstorganisation und Evolution. Akademie-Verlag,Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling W, Karmeshu, Scharnhorst A. (2000) Economic and technological search processes in a complex adaptive landscape. In: Kertesz J, Kondor I (eds) Econophysics - an emerging science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (ed) (1971) Integrated experimental ecology. methods and results of ecosystem research in the German Soiling Project. Ecological Studies 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Mueller-Dombois D (1967) Tentative physiognomic-ecological classification of plant formations of the earth. Ber Geobot Inst ETH 37: 21–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Feistel R, Ebeling W (1989) Evolution of complex systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederichs K (1927) Grundsätzliches über die Lebenseinheiten höherer Ordnung und den ökologischen Einheitsfaktor. Naturw 15:153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haken H (1983) Synergetics. An introduction, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haken H (1988) Information and self-organization: a macroscopic approach to complex systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauhs M (1998) Results and perspectives of ecosystem modelling. In: Bayreuther Institut für Terrestrische Ökosystemforschung (BITÖK): Forschungsbericht 1995–97. BITÖK, Bayreuth, pp 161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann G (1969) Neue Wege der Vegetationsforschung. Arch Forstwes 18:1225–1242

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann G (1997) Mitteleuropäische Wald- und Forst-Ökosystemtypen in Wort und Bild. Special issue of AFZ/Der Wald, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann G (1998) Alfred Möllers Leitbild einer zukunftsorientierten Waldwirtschaft. AFZ/ Der Wald 53: 674–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann G, Jenssen M (1999) Quantifizierung der Naturnähe als Planungsgrundlage für praktische Waldumbaumaßnahmen. AFZ/Der Wald 54: 575–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann G, Jenssen M, Anders S (1999) Umweltbeobachtung in Wäldern und Forsten auf der Grundlage von Ökosystemtypen. Beitr. Forstwirtsch. u. Landsch ökol 33: 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, pp 292–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilvessalo Y, Ilvessalo M (1975) The forest types of Finland in the light of natural development and yield capacity of forest stands. Acta Forestalia Fennica 144: 1–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen M (1999) Im Gebiet verbreitete Typen von Wald- und Forstökosystemen als ökologische Elementareinheiten des Waldes mit Grundlageninformationen für Waldbewirtschaftung und Waldstabilität. In: Anders S, Beck W, Bolte A, Hofmann G, Jenssen M, Krakau UK, Müller J. Abschlußbericht zum Vorhaben “Waldökosystemforschung Eberswalde: Einfluss von Niederschlagsarmut und erhöhtem Stickstoffeintrag auf Kiefern-, Eichen- und Buchen-Wald- und Forstökosysteme des nordostdeutschen Tieflandes” für das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), FKZ 0339500 C, pp 176–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen M, Hofmann G (1996) The natural life cycle of a beech forest as an example of self-organization in forest ecosystems. In: Freund JA (ed) Dynamik, Evolution, Strukturen: Nichtlineare Dynamik und Statistik komplexer Strukturen. Verlag Dr. Köster, Berlin, pp 266–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen M, Hofmann G (1997) Entwicklungszyklen des baltischen Buchenwaldes. AFZ/Der Wald 52: 1012–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen M, Hofmann G (1997) Einstellung eines reifen Entwicklungszyklus im Buchenwald. AFZ/ Der Wald 52: 1015–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen M, Anders S, Hofmann G (1994) Neue Wege der Ökosystemmodellierung. In: Wenkel KO, Schulz A, Lutze G (eds) Landschaftsmodellierung. Berichte des Zentrums für Agrarlandschafts- und Landnutzungsforschung (ZALF) Müncheberg 13: 84–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Jörgensen SE, Patten BC, Straskraba M (1992) Ecosystems emerging: toward an ecology of complex systems in a complex future. Ecol Model 62: 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • v. Krüdener A (1903) An attempt of classification of soil cover according to location, soil, solar radiation and regeneration of forest trees by the Shelterwood system and by clear cuttings and planting (in Russian). Lesnoi Zhurnal 3: 1430–1468

    Google Scholar 

  • v. Krüdener A (1927) Waldtypen. Neumann-Verlag, Neudamm

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger FR (1984) Physik und Evolution: physikalische Ansätze zu einer Einheit der Naturwissenschaften auf evolutiver Grundlage. Paul Parey, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibundgut H (1978) Über die Dynamik europäischer Urwälder. Allg. Forst-Z 33: 686–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens GE, Bormann FH (1977) Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Migunova ES (2000) Forest ecosystems: principles of differentiation and classification. Forstarchiv 71:14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohren GMJ, Bartelnik HH, Jansen JJ (eds) (1994) Contrasts between biologically-based process models and management-oriented growth and yield models. Special issue of Forest Ecology and Management 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov GF (1904) On the stand types and their importance for forestry (in Russian). Lesnoi Zh 1:14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller A (1913) Jahresbericht der Tagung des Deutschen Forstvereins 1913 in Trier. Dtsch Forstverein, Trier

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller A (1922) Der Dauerwaldgedanke, sein Sinn und seine Bedeutung. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller F (1997) State-of-the-art in ecosystem theory. Ecol Model 100: 135–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller F, Breckling B, Bredemeier M, Grimm V, Malchow H, Nielsen SN, Reiche EW (1996) Ökosystemare Selbstorganisation. In: Fränzle O, Müller F, Schröder W (eds) Handbuch der Ökosystemforschung, III-2.5. Ecomed-Verlag, Landsberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols GE (1917) The interpretation and application of certain terms and concepts in the ecological classification of plant communities. Plant World 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarge H, Hofmann G (1964) Soziologische Artengruppen mitteleuropäischer Wälder. Arch. Forstwes.13: 913–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson T (ed) (1980) Structure and function of Northern coniferous forests. Ecol Bull 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmert H (1985) Was geschieht im Klimaxstadium? Naturwissenschaften 72: 505–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scamoni A, Passarge H (1959) Gedanken zu einer natürlichen Ordnung der Waldgesellschaften. Arch Forstwes 8: 386–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukachev VN (1944) On principles of genetic classification in biocenology. Ecology 39: 364–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukachev VN (1960) The correlation between the concepts “Forest Ecosystem” and “Forest Biogeocoenose” and their importance for the classification of forests. Silva Fennica 105: 94–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16:284–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thienemann A (1939) Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Ökologie. Arch Hydrobiol 35: 267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüxen R (1937) Die Pflanzengesellschaften Nordwestdeutschlands. Mitt flor-soziol Arbeitsgemeinschaft 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüxen R (1957) Entwurf einer Definition der Pflanzengesellschaft. Mitt flor-soziol Arbeitsgemeinschaft 6/7

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker LC (1999) The North American forests. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. habil. Gerhard Hofmann, on the occasion of his 70th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jenssen, M. (2001). An Empirically Based Approach to Self-Organization in Forest Ecosystems. In: Matthies, M., Malchow, H., Kriz, J. (eds) Integrative Systems Approaches to Natural and Social Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56585-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56585-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62526-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56585-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics