Advertisement

Whole-House Measurements of Standby Power Consumption

  • J. P. Ross
  • Alan Meier
Conference paper

Abstract

We investigated the variation in standby power consumption in ten California homes. Total standby power in the homes ranged from 14–169 W, with an average of 67 W. This corresponded to 5%–26% of the homes’ annual electricity use. The appliances with the largest standby losses were televisions, set-top boxes and printers. The large variation in the standby power of appliances providing the same service demonstrates that manufacturers are able to reduce standby losses without degrading performance. Replacing existing units with appliances with 1 W or less of standby power would reduce standby losses by 68%.

Keywords

Electricity Consumption Household Appliance Annual Electricity Standby Power Utility Bill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Huber, W. 1997. Standby Power Consumption in U.S. Residences. LBNL-41107. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, Berkeley, Ca. USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meier, A., Rosen, K. 1999. Leaking Electricity in Domestic Appliances. Proceedings of 50th International Appliance Technical Conference, West Lafayette, Indiana, Steering Committee of the IATC.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meier, A., Huber, W., Rosen, K. 1998. Reducing Electricity to 1 Watt. ACEEE Summer Study of Energy Efficiency in Buildings. August. Pacific Grove, California.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meier, A., Huber, W. 1997. Results from the investigations on leaking electricity in the USA. First International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances, Nov. 10–12, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meier, A., Ranier, L., Greenberg, S. 1990. Miscellaneous Electrical Energy Use in Homes. Energy, V.17 No. 5: 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Molinder, 0. 1997. Study on Miscellaneous Standby Consumption of Household Equipment. Prepared for the EU under contact 4.1031/E96-008. (EU-DG XVII, June 25) Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murakoshi, C. Personal communication. May 2000Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakagami, H., Tanaka, A., Murakoshi, C. 1997. Standby Electricity Consumption in Japanese Houses. Jyukanko Research Institute, JapanGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rath, U., Hellmann, R. 1997. Klimaschutz Durch Minderung von Leerlaufverlustenbei Elektrogeraten. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, Forschungsbericht 20408541, UBA-FB 97-071.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siderius, H. 1998. Standby Consumption in Households. Van Holsteijn en Kemma, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siderius, H. 1995. Household Consumption of Electricity in the Netherlands. Van Holsteijn en Kemma, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sidler, O. 2000. Campagne de mesures sur le fonctionnement en veille des appareils domestiques. Sophia-Antipolis (France), ADEME.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Ross
    • 1
  • Alan Meier
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations