Advertisement

CT Technique

  • Armando Rossi
  • Giorgio Rossi
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

An efficient technique is indispensable if clinically relevant information is to be obtained.

Keywords

Contrast Agent Tomografia Computerizzata Compute Tomog Barium Sulfate Oral Contrast Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Angelelii G, Macarini L (1988) CT of the bowel: use of the water to enhance depiction. Radiology 169:848–849Google Scholar
  2. Angelelii G, Macarini L (1992) CT del tratto gastroenterico. Minerva Medic, TurinGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelelii G, Macarini L, Frazzle A (1987) Use of the water as an oral contrast agent for Ct study of the stomach (letter). AJR Am J Roentgenol 149:1084Google Scholar
  4. Aronberg DJ (1983) Techniques. In: LEE JKT, Sagely SS, Stanley RJ (eds) Computed body tomography Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Beart AL, Rex G, Wills G, Marshal G, Deschepper C (1980) Computed tomography of the rectum with water as contrast. Gastrointes Radiol 14:345–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baert AL, Roex L, Marchal G, Hermans P, Dewilde G, Wilms G (1989) Computed tomography of the stomach with water as an oral contrast agent: technique and preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:633–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown DL, Johnson JB, Kraus AP, Duke RA, Barrett MR (1987) Computed tomography with intraperitoneal contrast medium for localization of peritoneal dialysis leaks. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:276–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caoili EM, Paulson EKl Heyneman LE, et al (2000) Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: feasibility of a nowel technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:487–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Caseiro-Alves F, Goncalo M, Abraul E, et al (1995) Induced pneumoperitoneum in CT evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Abdom Imaging 20:52–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cronin EB, Belville JS, Tumeh SS (1988) New low-density contrast agent for evaluation of the rectosigmoid with CT. Radiology 169:405Google Scholar
  11. Dunick NR, Jones RB, Doppman JL, Speyer J, Myers CE (1979) Intraperitoneal contrast infusion for assessment of intraperitoneal fluid dynamics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 133:221–223Google Scholar
  12. Furukawa H, Sano K, Kosuge T, et al (1997) Analysis of biliary drainage in the caudate lobe of the liver: comparison of three-dimensional CT cholangiography and rotating cine cholangiography. Radiology 204:113–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillams A, Gardener J, Richards R, et al (1994) Three-dimensional CT cholangiography: a new technique for biliary tract imaging. Br J Radiol 67:445–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gossios KJ, Tsianos EV, Demon LL, et al (1991) Use of water or air as oral contrast media for computed tomography study of the gastric wall: comparison of the two techniques. Gastrointest Radiol 16:293–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hatfield KD, Segal SD, Tait K (1980) Barium sulfate for abdominal computed assisted tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4:570–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansen GJ (1978) Assessment of a nonionic contrast medium (Amipaque) in the gastrointestinal tract. Invest Radiol 523:13–15Google Scholar
  17. Kivisaari L, Kormano M (1982) Comparison of diatrizoate and barium sulfate bowel markers in clinical CT. Eur J Radiol 2:33–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maxwell AJ, Boggis CRM, Sambrook P (1990) Computed tomo-graphic peritoneography in the investigation of abdominal wall and genital swelling in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clin Radiol 41:100–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Megibow AJ (1986) Techniques of gastrointestinal computed tomography. In: Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ (eds) Computed tomography of the gastrointestinal tract. Mosby, St LouisGoogle Scholar
  20. Megibow AJ, Zerhouni EA, Hulnick DH, Bezanbaum R, Balthazar EJ (1984) Technical note. Air insufflation of the colon as an adjunct to computed tomography of the pelvis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:797–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitchell DG, Bjorgvinsson E, Termeulen D, et al (1985) Gastrografin versus dilute barium coloni CT examination: a blind, randomized study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:451–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raptopoulos V, David MA, Davidoff A, et al (1987) Fat-density oral contrast agent for abdominal CT. Radiology 164:653–656PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Raptopoulos V (1989) Technical principles in the CT evaluation of the gut. Radiât Clin North Am 27:631–651Google Scholar
  24. RoUandi GA, Curone PF, Pastorino C, et al (1991) Gastromiro vs Gastrografin vs Prontobario TAC per tomografia computerizzata. Radiât Med 82:295–302Google Scholar
  25. Rotondo A, Grassi R, Contino A, Smahino F (1991) Spazi peritoneale In: Dal Pozzo M (ed) Compendio di tomografia computerizzata. UTET-USES, VeronaGoogle Scholar
  26. Scanziani R, Dozio B, Caimi F, De Rossi N, Magri F, Surian M (1992) Peritoneography and peritoneal computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of subcutaneous leaks sites during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Peril Dial Bull 4:163–166Google Scholar
  27. Solomon A, Michowitz M, Papo J, et al (1986) Computed tomographic air enema. Gastrointest Radiol 11:194–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Soto JA, Velez SM, Guzman J (1999) Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:943–948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Stabile lanora AA, Scardapane A, Midiri M, Rotondo R, Angelelli G (2000) Studio pre-e postoperatorio delle vie biliari con tomografia computerizzata spirale. Radiol Med 100:152–159Google Scholar
  30. Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, et al (1994) Intravenous cholangiography with heUcal CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 192:675–680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Stork J (1985) Intraperitoneal contrast agents for computed tomography AJR Am J Roentgenol 145:300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Beers BE, Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, et al (1994) Noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: use of three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 1962: 1331–1335Google Scholar
  33. Winter TC, Ager GD, Nghiem HV, Hill RS, Harrison SD, Freeny PC (1996) Upper gastrointestinal tract and abdomen: water as an orally administered contrast agent for helical CT. Radiology 201:365–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zerhouni EA, Fishmann EK, Jones B (1988) Principles and techniques. In: Fishman EK, Jones B (eds) Computed tomography of the gastrointestinal tract. Churchill Livingstone, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Armando Rossi
    • 1
  • Giorgio Rossi
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Radiological SciencesUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly
  2. 2.Local Health Unit (ASL)Hospital of FidenzaFidenza (Pr)Italy

Personalised recommendations