Advertisement

Physiology and Physiopathology of the Peritoneum

  • Armando Rossi
  • Giorgio Rossi
Chapter
  • 159 Downloads
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

The particular structure of the peritoneum provides its membranes with the pecuHar possibility to secrete, absorb and filtrate, and gives them antibacterial, plastic and supporting properties. Therefore, we believe that it can be useful to recollect some physiological or physiopathological elements for a better evaluation of the mechanisms underlying generation, blockade and diffusion of the pathological processes affecting the peritoneal leaflets, the subperitoneal spaces, and the intraperitoneal organs.

Keywords

Peritoneal Cavity Tomografia Computerizzata Falciform Ligament Transverse Mesocolon Paracolic Gutter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Capua A (1934) Iniezioni di thorotrast colloïdale nella cavità peritoneale per lo studio della diffusione del mezzo di contrasto per le vie linfatiche. Radiol Med 21:289Google Scholar
  2. Cavallaro M (1932) 11 biossido di Torio per via endoperitoneale. Riforma Med 48:1507Google Scholar
  3. Courtice FC, Steinbeck AW (1951) Absorption of protein from peritoneal cavity J Physiol 114:336–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Courtice FC, Steinbeck AW (1951) The effects of lymphatic obstruction and posture on the absorption of protein from the peritoneal cavity J Exp Biol Med Sei 29:451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunnick NR, Jones RB, Doppman JL, Speyer J, Myers CE (1979) Intraperitoneal contrast infusion for assessment of intraperitoneal fluid dynamics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 133:221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Duranteau M, Oury F, Proux C, Leger au]R (1955) Essais de limphographie abdomino-thoracic par injection intraperitoneal des substances iodées. Presse Med 63:1986Google Scholar
  7. Efskind L, Ortliche X (1940) Veränderungen bei intraperitonealer Injektion von Thoriumdioxid (thorotrast). Acta Chir Scand 84:79Google Scholar
  8. Feldman GB, Knapp RC (1974) Lymphatic drainage of the peritoneal cavity and its significance in ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 119:991–994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Held J (1932) Die Resorption von koUoidalen Thorium (Thorotrast) aus der Bauchhoehle. Z Exp Med 80:819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holm-Nielsen P (1953) Pathogenesis of ascites in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 33:10–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leak LV, Rahil K (1978) Permeability of the diaphragmatic mesothelium: the ultrastructural basis for stomata. Am J Anat 151:557–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mavroudis C, Malangoni MA, Katzmark SL, et al (1988) Comparative clearance rates of the pleural and peritoneal cavities (abstract). Radiology 168:292Google Scholar
  13. Menville LJ, Anée JN (1932) Roentgen-ray study in absorption of Thorium dioxide from the peritoneal cavity of the albino rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 30:28Google Scholar
  14. Meyers MA (1970) The spread and localization of acute intraperitoneal effusions. Radiology 95:545–547Google Scholar
  15. Meyers MA (1973) Distribution of intraabdominal malignant seeding: dependency on dynamics of flow and ascites fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 119:198–206Google Scholar
  16. Meyers MA (1992) Radiologia dinamica dell’addome. Verduci, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyers MA, Oliphant M, Berne AS, Feldberg MAM (1978) The peritoneal ligaments and mesenteries: pathways of intraabdominal spread of disease. Radiology 163:593–504Google Scholar
  18. Micera O (1993) La fisiologia del peritoneo. Paper presented at the 10th National Congress of SIRM, Gastroenterological Radiology Section, NaplesGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliphant M, Berne AS (1982) CT of subperitoneal spaces: demonstration of direct spread of intraabdominal diseases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:1127–1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oliphant M, Berne AS, Meyers MA (1986) Subperitoneal spread of intra-abdominal disease. In: Meyers MA (ed) Computed tomography of the gastrointestinal tract. Springer, New York Heidelberg BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Procaccini D, Querques M, Tappi A (1988) Peritoneal clearances. Long-term study. ASAIO Trans 34:437–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Proto AY, Lane EJ, Marangola JP (1976) A new concept of ascitic fluid distribution. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126:974–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Raval B, Lakmi N (1987) CT demonstration of preferential routes of the spread of pelvic disease. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 26:17–48Google Scholar
  24. Recklinghausen FT (1869) Van zur Fihresorption. Virchows Arch 26:172–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rotondo A, Grassi R, Contino A, Smaltino F (1991) Spazi peritoneali. In: Dal Pozzo G (ed) Compendio di tomografia computerizzata. UTET-USES, VeronaGoogle Scholar
  26. Salkin D (1934) Intra-abdominal pressure and its regulation. Am Rev Tubercul 30:436–457Google Scholar
  27. Vecchioli A, Bonomo L, Renda F (1984) Fisiopatologia del peritoneo. Report to the XXXIst National Congress of the National Society for Medical Radiology (SIRM). Monduzzi, BolognaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Armando Rossi
    • 1
  • Giorgio Rossi
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Radiological SciencesUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly
  2. 2.Local Health Unit (ASL)Hospital of FidenzaFidenza (Pr)Italy

Personalised recommendations