Skip to main content

Firm-specific cost savings and market power

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Experimental Markets

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Theory ((ECON.THEORY,volume 15))

Summary

We report a policy experiment that illustrates a potential problem of using historical pass-through rates as a means of predicting the competitive consequences of projected firm-specific cost savings in antitrust contexts, particularly in merger analysis. The effects of cost savings on welfare can vary vastly, depending on how the savings affect the industry supply schedule. In a capacity-constrained price-setting oligopoly, we observe that cost savings can overwhelm behaviorally salient market power incentives when the savings affect marginal (high cost) units. However, cost savings of the same magnitude on an infra-marginal unit leave market power unchanged.

Financial assistance from the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. We thank without implicating an anonymous referee, Tim Cason, Signe-Mary McKernan, Stan Reynolds, Bradley Ruffle, Chuck Thomas, and seminar participants at North Carolina State University, Virginia Commonwealth University, and the 1998 Regional Economic Science Association meetings. The data and a sample copy of the instructions are available upon request from the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashenfelter, O., Ashmore, D., Baker, J., McKernan, S.: Identifying the firm-specific cost pass-through rate. FTC Working Paper #217 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cason, T., Williams, A.: Competitive equilibrium convergence in a posted-offer market with extreme eamings inequities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 14, 331–352 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.: Advance production and cournot outcomes: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (forthcoming) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., Holt, C.: Market power in laboratory markets with posted prices. Rand Journal of Economics 25, 467–487 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., Wilson, B.: Mixed strategy nash equilibrium predictions as a means of organizing behavior in posted-offer market experiments. Manuscript, Virginia Commonwealth University (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., Shapiro, C.: Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review 80, 107–26 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D., Ostroy, J.: Competitivity in auction markets: An experimental and theoretical investigation. Economic Journal 105, 22–53 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E., Spitzer, M.: The Coase theorem: Some experimental issues. Journal of Law and Economics 25, 73–98 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., Smith, V.L.: Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7, 346–80 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C.: The exercise of ma rket power in laboratory experiments. Journal of Law and Economics 32, S107–S130 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C., Solis-Soberon, F.: The ca1culation of mixed-strategy equilibria in posted-offer markets. In: Isaac, R.M. (ed.) Research in experimental economics, Vol. 5. Greenwich: JAI Press 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J.: Nash equilibrium and buyer rationing mies: Experimental evidence. Economic Inquiry 31, 631–446 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J., Rassenti, S., Reynolds, S., Smith, V.L.: Bertrand-Edgeworth competition in experimental markets. Econometrica 62, 343–371 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassenti, S., Reynolds, S., Smith, V.L.: Adaptation and convergence of behavior in repeated experimental Cournot games. Manuscript, University of Arizona (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission: Horizontal Merger Guidelines,Section 4 (revised) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Werden, G.: A robust test for consumer welfare enhancing mergers among seHers of differentiated products. Journal of Industrial Economics 44, 409–413 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B.: What collusion? Unilateral market power as a catalyst for countercyclical markups. Experimental Economics 1, 133–145 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yde, P., Vita, M.: Merger efficiencies: Reconsidering the “passing-on” requirement. Antitrust Law Journal 64, 735–747 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Davis, D.D., Wilson, B.J. (2001). Firm-specific cost savings and market power. In: Cason, T., Noussair, C. (eds) Advances in Experimental Markets. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56448-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56448-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62657-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56448-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics