Advertisement

Stomatal Water Relations and the Control of Hydraulic Supply and Demand

  • Thomas N. Buckley
  • Keith A. Mott
Part of the Progress in Botany book series (BOTANY, volume 63)

Abstract

Stomata have fascinated plant biologists for well over 100 years. It is difficult to think of another plant system that responds to so many factors or displays such complexity at so many levels. Indeed, when one considers the number of feedback loops involving stomatal conductance and all of the potential interactions among these feedbacks, it is really quite remarkable that stomata work at all.

Keywords

Water Potential Stomatal Conductance Guard Cell Transpiration Rate Leaf Water Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assmann SM (1999) The cellular basis of guard cell sensing of rising CO2. Plant Cell Environ 22:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assmann SM, Grantz DA (1990) Stomatal response to humidity in sugarcane and soybean: effect of vapour pressure difference in the kinetics of the blue light response. Plant Cell Environ 13:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assmann SM, Shimazaki K (1999) The multisensory guard cell. Stomatal responses to blue light and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol 119:809–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assmann SM, Snyder JA, Lee YJ (2000) ABA-deficient (aba1) and ABA-insensitive (abi1–1, abi2–1) mutants of Arabidopsis have a wild-type stomatal response to humidity. Plant Cell Environ 23:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blatt MR (2000) Cellular signaling and volume control in stomatal movements in plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16:221–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley TN, Mott KA (2000) Stomatal responses to non-local changes in PFD: evidence for long-distance hydraulic interactions. Plant Cell Environ 23: 301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckley TN, Farquhar GD, Mott KA (1997) Qualitative effects of patchy stomatal conductance distribution features on gas exchange calculations. Plant Cell Environ 20:867–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunce JA (1997) Does transpiration control stomatal responses to water vapour pressure deficit? Plant Cell Environ 20:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Comstock J, Mencuccini M (1998) Control of stomatal conductance by leaf water potential in Hymenoclea salsola (T.&G.), a desert shrub. Plant Cell Environ 21:1029–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comstock JP (2000) Variation in hydraulic architecture and gas-exchange in two desert sub-shrubs, Hymenoclea salsola (T.&G.) and Ambrosia dumosa (Payne). Oec 125:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowan IR (1972) Oscillations in stomatal conductance and plant functioning associated with stomatal conductance: observations and a model. Planta 106:185–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowan IR (1994) As to the mode of action of the guard cells in dry air. In: Schulze E-D, Caldwell MM (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 205–299Google Scholar
  13. Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1977) Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symp Soc Exp Biol 31:471–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Delwiche MJ, Cooke JR (1977) An analytical model of the hydraulic aspects of stomatal dynamics. J Theor Biol 69:113–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ewert MS, Outlaw WH, Zhang S, Aghoram K, Riddle KA (2000) Accumulation of an apoplastic solute in the guard-cell wall is sufficient to exert a significant effect on transpiration in Vicia faba leaflets. Plant Cell Environ 23:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farquhar GD (1978) Feedforward responses of stomata to humidity. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:787–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Tyerman SD, Cleary AL, Lloyd J, Farquhar GD (1995) Guard cell pressure/aperture characteristics measured with the pressure probe. Plant Cell Environ 18:795–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1997) The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant Cell Environ 20:142–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1998) A study of stomatal mechanics using the cell pressure probe. Plant Cell Environ 21:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franks PJ, Buckley TN, Shope JC, Mott KA (2001) Guard cell pressure and volume measured concurrently by confocal microscopy and the cell pressure probe. Plant Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Grantz DA (1990) Plant responses to atmospheric humidity. Plant Cell Environ 13:667–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grantz DA, Schwartz A (1988) Guard cells of Commelina communis L. do not respond metabolically to osmotic stress in isolated epidermis: implications for stomatal responses to drought and humidity. Planta 174:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haefner JW, Buckley TN, Mott KA (1997) A spatially explicit model of patchy stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ 20:1087–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hubbard RM, Ryan MG, Stiller V, Sperry JS (2001) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine. Plant Cell Environ 24:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iwanoff L (1928) Zur Methodik der Transpirations-bestimmung am Standort. Ber Dtsh Bot Ges 46: 306–310Google Scholar
  26. Jarvis AJ, Young PC, Taylor CJ, Davies WJ (1999) An analysis of the dynamic response of stomatal conductance to a reduction in humidity over leaves of Cedrella oderata. Plant Cell Environ 22:913–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kappen L, Haeger S (1991) Stomatal responses of Tradescantia albiflora to changing air humidity in light and in darkness. J Exp Bot 42:979–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein M, Cheng G, Chung M, Tallman G (1996) Effects of turgor potentials of epidermal cells neighbouring guard cells on stomatal opening in detached leaf epidermis and intact leaflets of Vicia Faba L (faba bean). Plant Cell Environ 19:1399–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lösch R, Schulze E-D (1994) Internal coordination of plant responses to drought and evaporational demand. In: Schulze E-D, Caldwell MM (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 185–204Google Scholar
  30. Meinzer FC, Grantz DA (1990) Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity. Plant Cell Environ 13:383–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Jackson P, Holbrook NM, Butierrez MV, Cavelier J (1995) Environmental and physiological regulation of transpiration in tropical forest gap species: the influence of boundary layer and hydraulic conductance properties. Oec 101:514–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monteith JL (1995) A reinterpretation of the stomatal response to humidity. Plant Cell Environ 18:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mott KA, Buckley TN (1998) Stomatal heterogeneity. J Exp Bot 49:407–417Google Scholar
  34. Mott KA, Buckley TN (2000) Patchy stomatal conductance: emergent collective behaviour of stomata. Trends Plant Sci 5:258–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mott KA, Franks PJ (2001) The role of epidermal turgor in stomatal interactions following a perturbation in humidity. Plant Cell Environ (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Mott KA, Parkhurst DF (1991) Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant Cell Environ 14:509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mott KA, Denne F, Powell J (1997) Interactions among stomata in response to perturbations in humidity. Plant Cell Environ 20:1098–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mott KA, Shope JC, Buckley TN (1999) Effects of humidity on light-induced stomatal opening: evidence for hydraulic coupling among stomata. J Exp Bot 50:1207–1213Google Scholar
  39. Nonami H, Schulze E-D (1989) Cell water potential, osmotic potential, and turgor in the epidermis and mesophyll of transpiring leaves. Planta 177:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nonami H, Schulze E-D, Ziegler H (1990) Mechanisms of stomatal movement in response to air humidity, irradiance and xylem water potential. Planta 183:57–64Google Scholar
  41. Raschke K (1970) Stomatal responses to pressure changes and interruptions in the water supply of detached leaves of Zea mays L. Plant Physiol 45:415–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raschke K, Fellows MP (1971) Stomatal movement in Zea mays: shuttle of potassium and chloride between guard cells and subsidiary cells. Planta 110:296–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saliendra NZ, Sperry JS, Comstock JP (1995) Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis. Planta 196:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shackel KA, Brinckmann E (1985) In situ measurement of epidermal cell turgor, leaf water potential, and gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana L. Plant Physiol 78:66–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharpe PJH, Wu H, Spence RD (1987) Stomata mechanics. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar GD (eds) Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 91–114Google Scholar
  46. Sperry JS (2000) Hydraulic constraints on plant gas exchange. Ag For Meteor 104:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steudle E, Zimmermann U, Luttge U (1977) Effect of turgor pressure and cell size on the wall elasticity of plant cells. Plant Physiol 59:285–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1989) Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Molec Biol 40:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas N. Buckley
    • 1
  • Keith A. Mott
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations