Multiscale Scientific Computation: Review 2001

  • Achi Brandt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 20)

Abstract

Most of the fundamental problems in physics, chemistry and engineering involve computation too hard even for future supercomputers, if conventional mathematical approaches are used. The reason is always a product of several complexity factors associated with the wide range of space and time scales characteristic to such problems. Each of these complexity factors can in principle be removed by various multiscale algorithms, i.e., employing separate processing at each scale of the problem, combined with interscale iterative interactions. A wide range of multiscale computational methods is described, emphasizing main ideas and inter-relations between various fields. The reported areas include: top-efficiency multigrid methods in fluid dynamics; inverse PDE problems and data assimilation; feedback optimal control; PDE solvers on unbounded domains and on adaptable grids; wave/ray methods for highly indefinite equations; rigorous quantitative analysis of multigrid; manyeigenfunction problems and ab-initio quantum chemistry; fast evaluation of integral transforms on adaptive grids; multigrid Dirac solvers; fast inverse-matrix and determinant calculations and updates; multiscale Monte-Carlo methods in statistical physics, including the renormalization multigrid (RMG) methods; molecular mechanics (including fast force summation, fast macromolecular energy minimization, and Monte-Carlo methods at equilibrium, both for macromolecules and for large ensembles of small molecules); combination of small-scale equilibrium with large-scale dynamics; image processing (edge detection and picture segmentation); tomography (medical imaging and radar reconstruction); efficient, general and highly accurate algebraic multigrid (AMG) and homogenization schemes; fast practical graph algorithms; data clustering; and multiscale approaches to global optimization.

Keywords

Vortex Anisotropy Convection Manifold Covariance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alessandrini, G., Stable determination of conductivity by boundary measurements, Appl. Anal. 27 (1988) 153–172.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arian, A. and Ta’asan, S., Multigrid one shot methods for optimal control problems: Infinite dimensional control, ICASE Report, 1994, pp. 94–52.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arian, A. and Ta’asan, S., Shape optimization in one shot, in: Optimal Design and Control (Boggard, J., Burkardt, J., Gunzburger, M. and Peterson, J., eds.), Birkhauser Boston Inc., 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ausiello, G., Crescenzi, P., Gambosi, G., Kann, V., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A. and Protasi, M., Complexity and Approsimation, Springer Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babuška, I. and Melenk, J. M., The partition of unity method, Int. J. Num. Methods in Engineering 40 (1997) 727–758.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bai, D. and Brandt, A., Local mesh refinement multilevel techniques, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 8 (1987) 109–134.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bai, D. and Brandt, A., Multiscale computation of polymer models, in [39], pp. 250–266.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baschnagel, J., Binder, K., Doruker, P., Gusev, A. A., Hahn, O., Kremer, K., Mattice, W. L., Müller-Plathe, F., Murat, M., Paul, W., Santos, S., Suter, U. W. and Tries, V., Bridging the gap between atomistic and coarse-grained models of polymers: Status and perspectives, Advances in Polymer Science, Springer Verlag 152 (2000) 41–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bates, J. R., Li, Y., Brandt, A., McCormick, S. F. and Ruge, J., A global shallow water numerical model based on the semi-Lagrangian advection of potential vorticity, Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 121 (1995) 1981–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bates, J. R., McCormick, S. F., Ruge, J., Sholl, D. S. and Yavneh, I., A semi-Lagrangian approach to the shallow water equations, 6th Copper Mountain Conf. on Multigrid Methods, NASA Conference Publication 3224, Part 2, 1993, pp. 593–604.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bates, J. R., Semazzi, F. H. M., Higgins, R. W. and Barros, S. R. M., Integration of the shallow water equations on the sphere using a vector semi-Lagrangian scheme with a multigrid solver, Mon. Wea. Rev. 18 (1990) 1615–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck, T. L., Multigrid high order mesh refinement technique, J. Comput. Chem. 20 (1999) 1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beck, T. L., Multiscale methods for self-consistent electronic structure in real space, in [39], pp. 90–103.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ben-Av, R., Acceleration Methods in MC Simulations, Ph.D. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ben-Av, R., Brandt, A., Harmatz, M., Katznelson, E., Lauwers, P. G., Solomon, S. and Wolowesky, K., Fermion simulation using parallel transported multigrid, Phys. Lett. B253 (1991) 185.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ben-Av, R., Brandt, A. and Solomon, S., The Fermionic matrix, instantons, zero modes and multigrid, Nucl. Phys. B329 (1990) 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernholc, J., Briggs, E. L., Buongiorno Nardelli, M., Fattebert, J.-L., Ramamoorthy, M., Schmidt, W. G. and Sullivan, D. J., Large-scale, multilevel solutions of Kohn-Sham equations: methodology and applications, in [39], pp. 65–89.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brandt, A., Multi-level adaptive technique (MLAT) for fast numerical solutions to boundary value problems, in: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics (Cabannes, H. and Temam, R., eds.), Lecture Notes in Physics 18, Springer-Verlag, 1973, pp. 82–89.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brandt, A., Multi-level adaptive solutions to boundary value problems, Math. Comp. 31 (1977) 333–390.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brandt, A., Stages in developing multigrid solutions, in: Proc. 2nd Int. Congr. on Numerical Methods for Engineers (Absi, E., Glowinski, R., Lascaux, P. and Veysseyre, H., eds.), Dunod, Paris, 1980, pp. 23–43.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brandt, A., Multi-grid solvers on parallel computers, in: Elliptic Problem Solvers (Schultz, M., ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1981, pp. 39–84.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brandt, A., Multi-Grid Solvers for Non-Elliptic and Singular-Perturbation Steady-State Problems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, November 1981.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brandt, A., Guide to multigrid development, in: Multigrid Methods (Hackbusch, W. and Trottenberg, U., eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1982, pp. 220–312.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brandt, A., Multigrid Techniques: 1984 Guide, with Applications to Fluid Dynamics, 191 pages, 1984, ISBN-3-88457-081-1, GMD Studien Nr. 85. Available from GMD-AIW, Postfach 1316, D-53731, St. Augustin 1, Germany, 1984.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brandt, A., Algebraic multigrid theory: The symmetric case, Appl. Math. Comput. 19 (1986) 23–56.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brandt, A., Multilevel computations: Review and recent developments, in: Multigrid Methods: Theory, Applications and Supercomputing (McCormick, S. F., ed.), Marcel-Dekker, 1988, pp. 35–62.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brandt, A., The Weizmann Institute Research in Multilevel Computation: 1988 Report, in: Proc. 4th Copper Mountain Conf. on Multigrid Methods (Mandel, J. et al., eds.), SIAM, 1989, pp. 13–53.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brandt, A., Rigorous local mode analysis of multigrid, in: Preliminary Proc. 4th Copper Mountain Conf. on Multigrid Methods, Copper Mountain, Colorado, April 1989. An updated version appeared as Weizmann Institute Report, 1991. The first part has appeared as [32].Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brandt, A., Multilevel computations of integral transforms and particle interactions with oscillatory kernels, Comput. Phys. Comm. 65 (1991) 24–38.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brandt, A., Multiscale computational methods: research activities, in: Proc. 1991 Hang Zhou International Conf. on Scientific Computation, (Chan, T. and Shi, Z.-C., eds.), World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1992.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brandt, A., Multigrid methods in lattice field computations, Nuclear Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 26 (1992) 137–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brandt, A., Rigorous quantitative analysis of multigrid: I. Constant coefficients two level cycle with L 2 norm, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31 (1994) 1695–1730.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brandt, A., Multiscale research in molecular dynamics, Gauss Center Report WI/GC-3, April 1995.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brandt, A., Proceedings of the multigrid tutorial, with applications to molecular dynamics, Weizmann Institute of Science, October 10–12, 1995.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brandt, A., The Gauss Center research in multiscale scientific computation, Electr. Trans. Numer. Anal. 6 (1997) 1–34.MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brandt, A., Barriers to Achieving Textbook Multigrid Efficiency in CFD, ICASE Interim Report No. 32, NASA/CR-198-207647. Gauss Center Report WI/GC-10, June 1998; updated December, 1998. Appears as Appendix C in [153].Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brandt, A., General highly accurate algebraic coarsening schemes, Electr. Trans. Num. Anal. 10 (2000) 1–20.MATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brandt, A., Multiscale scientific computation: six year summary, Gauss Center Report WI/GC-12, May 1999. Also in: http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~achi,and_in_MGNET.
  39. 39. Brandt, A., Bernholc, J. and Binder, K. (Eds.), Multiscale Computational Methods in Chemistry, NATO Science Series, Computer and System Sciences, Vol. 177, IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brandt, A. and Dinar, N., Multi-grid solutions to elliptic flow problems, in: Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations (Parter, S., ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1979, pp. 53–147.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brandt, A. and Diskin, B., Multigrid solvers for the non-aligned sonic flow: the constant coefficient case, Gauss Center Report WI/GC-8, 1997. Computer and Fluids 28 (1999) 511–549.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brandt, A. and Diskin, B., Multigrid solvers for non-aligned sonic flows, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21 (1999) 473–501.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brandt, A. and Dym, J., Fast computation of multiple line integrals, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20 (1999) 1417–1429.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brandt, A. and Dym, J., Fast robust discontinuity detection using multiple scales, preprint.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brandt, A. and Galun, M., Optimal multigrid algorithms for the massive Gaussian model and path integrals, J. Statist. Phys. 82 (1996) 1503–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brandt, A. and Galun, M., Optimal multigrid algorithms for variable-coupling isotropic Gaussian models, J. Statist. Phys. 88 (1997) 637–664.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brandt, A. and Galun, M., Statistically optimal multigrid algorithm for the anharmonic crystal model, Gauss Center Report WI/GC-9, March 1998.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brandt, A., Galun, M. and Ron, D., Optimal multigrid algorithms for calculating thermodynamic limits, J. Statist. Phys. 74 (1994) 313–348.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brandt, A. and Greenwald, J., Parabolic multigrid revisited, in: Multigrid Methods III (Hackbusch, W. and Trottenberg, U., eds.), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1991, pp. 143–154.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Brandt, A. and Iliyn, V., Multilevel approach in statistical physics of liquids, in [39], pp. 187–197.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Brandt, A. and Livshits, I., Wave-ray multigrid methods for standing wave equations, Electr. Trans. Numer. Anal. 6 (1997) 162–181.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Brandt, A. and Livshitz, I., Accuracy properties of the wave-ray multigrid algorithm for Helmholtz equation, in preparation.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Brandt, A. and Lubrecht, A. A., Multilevel matrix multiplication and the fast solution of integral equations, J. Comput. Phys. 90(2) (1990) 348–370.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Brandt, A., Mann, J. and Brodski, M., A Fast and Accurate Radon Transform Inversion Scheme, Patent assigned to Yeda Research and Development Co. Ltd., August 1995. U. S. Patent and Trademark Office Application No. 08/659, 595, filed 06/06/96. U. S. Patent No. 5, 778, 038, granted July 7, 1998 under the title “Computerized Tomography Scanner and Method of Performing Computerized Tomography”. European Patent Office Application No. 97108722.6-2305, filed 05/30/97.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Brandt, A., Mann, J., Brodski, M. and Galun, M., A fast and accurate multilevel inversion of the Radon transform, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 60 (1999) 437–462.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Brandt, A., McCormick, S. and Ruge, J., Algebraic multigrid (AMG) for automatic multigrid solution with application to geodetic computations, Institute for Computational Studies, POB 1852, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1982.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brandt, A., McCormick, S. and Ruge, J., Multi-grid methods for differential eigenproblems, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 4 (1983) 244–260.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Brandt, A., McCormick, S. and Ruge, J., Algebraic multigrid (AMG) for sparse matrix equations, in Sparsity and its Applications (Evans, D.J., ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984, pp. 257–284.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Brandt, A. and Mikulinsky, V., Recombining itérants in multigrid algorithms and problems with small islands, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 16 (1995) 20–28.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Brandt, A. and Ron, D., Renormalization Multigrid (RMG): Statistically optimal renormalization group flow and coarse-to-fine Monte Carlo acceleration, J. Stat. Phys. 102 (2001) 231–257. Also appeared as Gauss Center Report WI/GC-11, 1999, and with modification in [39], pp. 163-186.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Brandt, A., Ron, D. and Amit, D. J., Multi-level approaches to discrete-state and stochastic problems, in: Multigrid Methods, II (Hackbusch, W. and Trottenberg, U., eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1986, pp. 66–99.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Brandt, A. and Venner, C. H., Fast evaluation of integral transforms with asymptotically smooth kernels, Gauss Center Report WI/GC-2, 1995. SIAM J. of Sci. Comput. 19 (1998) 468–492.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Brandt, A. and Venner, C. H., Multilevel evaluation of integral transforms on adaptive grids, Gauss Center Report WI/GC-5, 1996. In: Multigrid Methods V, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 3 (Hackbusch, W. and Wittum, G., eds.), Sprinter Verlag, Berlin, 1999, pp. 20–44.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Brandt, A. and Yavneh, I., On multigrid solution of high-Reynolds incompressible entering flows, J. Comput. Phys. 101 (1992) 151–164.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Brandt, A. and Yavneh, I., Accelerated multigrid convergence and high-Reynolds recirculating flows, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14 (1993) 607–626.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Brandt, A. and Zaslavsky, L. Yu., Multiscale algorithm for atmospheric data assimilation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18 (1997) 949–956.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Briggs, W. L., Henson, V. E. and McCormick, S. F., A Multigrid Tutorial, 2nd Ed., SIAM, 2000.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bunch, J. R. and Nielsen, C. P., Updating the singular value decomposition, Numer. Math. 31 (1978) 111–129.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Calderon, A., On an inverse boundary value problem, in: Seminar on Numerical Analysis and its Applications (Meyer, W. and Raupp, M., eds.), Brazilian Mathematical Society, Rio de Janeiro, 1980, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Chan, T. F. and Keller, H. B., Arc-length continuation and multi-grid techniques for nonlinear elliptic eigenvalue problems, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 3 (1982) 173–194.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chan, T. F. and Bank, R. E., PLTMGC: A multi-grid continuation program for parametrized nonlinear elliptic systems, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7 (1986) 540–559.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Cormen, Leiserson and Rivest, Introduction to algorithms, J. ACM (2000).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Costiner, S., Simultaneous Multigrid Solvers for the Nonlinear Schrödinger Eigenvalue Problem, M.Sc. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, 1990.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Costiner, S. and Ta’asan, S., Adaptive multigrid techniques for large-scale eigenvalue problems: solutions of the Schrödinger problem in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. E51 (1995) 3704–3717.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Cuppen, J. J. M., A divide and conquer method for the tridiagonal eigenproblem, Numer. Math. 36 (1981) 177–195.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Deans, S. R., The Radon Transform and Some of its Applications, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1983.MATHGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Diskin, B., Multigrid algorithm with conditional coarsening for the non-aligned sonic flow, Electr. Trans. Numer. Anal. 6 (1997) 106–119.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Diskin, B., Efficient Multigrid Solvers for the Linearized Transonic Full Potential Equation, Ph.D. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, June 1998.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Dym, J., Multilevel Methods for Early Vision, Ph.D. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 1994.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Faddeeva, V. N., Computational Methods of Linear Algebra, Dover Publications, New York, 1959.MATHGoogle Scholar
  81. 81. Feige, U., Kortsarz and Peleg, D., The dense k-subgraph problem, Algorithmica, March 2001.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Flory, P. J., Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules, January 1989, ISBN 1569900191.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Forsythe, G. E. and Golub, G. H., On the stationary values of a second-degree polynomial on the unit sphere, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 13 (1965) 1050–1068.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Fuhrmann, D. R., An algorithm for subspace computation with applications in signal processing, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 9 (1988) 213–220.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Galli, G., Linear scaling method for electronic-structure calculations and quantum molecular dynamics simulations, Current Opinion in Solid State and Material Science 1(6) (1996) 864–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Galun, M., Optimal Multigrid Algorithms for Model Problems in Statistical Mechanics, M.Sc. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 1992.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Galun, M., Multigrid Algorithms for Optimal Computations in Statistical Physics, Ph.D. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, April 1998.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Gandlin, R., Multigrid Algorithms for an Inverse Problem in Impedance Tomography, M.Sc. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, June 1998.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gandlin, R., Proposal for Ph.D. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 1999.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Gandlin, R., Multigrid Algorithms for Inverse Problems, Progress Report, Feinberg Graduate School, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 2000.Google Scholar
  91. 91. Gödecker, S., Linear scaling electronic structure methods, Rev. Modern Phys. 71 (1999) 1085–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Golub, G. H. and von Matt, U., Quadratically constrained least squares and quadratic problems, Numer. Math. 59 (1991) 561–580.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Graph spanners, J. Graph Theory 13(1) (1989) 99–116.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Greengard, L., Fast algorithms for classical physics, Science 265 (1994) 909–914.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Greenwald, J. C., Multigrid Techniques for Parabolic Problems, Ph.D. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, June 1992.Google Scholar
  96. 96. Grünbaum, F. A., Diffuse tomography: the isotropic case, Inverse Problems 8 (1992) 409–419.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gupta, R. and Cordery, R., Monte Carlo renormalized Hamiltonian, Phys. Lett. 105A (1984) 415.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Guy, G. and Medioni, G., Inferring global perceptual contours from local features, Proc. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, 1993, pp. 881–893.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Hadany, R. and Harel, D., A multi-scale method for drawing graphs nicely, to appear in Discrete Appl. Math., Also Proc. 25 th Int. Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG’99V), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1665, Springer-Verlag, June 1999, pp. 262–277.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Haras, Z. and Ta’asan, S., Finite difference schemes for long time integration, J. Comp. Phys. 114(2) (1994).Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Harel, D., Computer Ltd., Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Herman, G., Image Reconstruction from Projections: The Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography, Academic Press, New York, 1980.MATHGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hill, T. L., Statistical Mechanics, McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York-Toronto-London, 1956.MATHGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Jameson, A., Solution of the Euler equations by a multigrid method, Appl. Math. Comput. 13 (1983) 327–356.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Jameson, A., Schmidt, W. and Türkei, E., Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes, AIAA Paper 81-1259, 1981.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. and Klein, M. L., Comparison of potential functions for simulating liquid water, J. Chem. Phys. 79 (1983) 926–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Jorgensen, W. L. and Jenson, C., Temperature dependence of TIP3P, SPC and TIP4P water from NPT Monte Carlo simulations: seeking temperatures of maximum density, J. Comp. Chem. 19 (1998) 1179–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Kalkreuter, T., Multigrid Methods for the Computation of Propagators in Gauge Fields, Ph.D. Thesis, Hamburg University, Report DESY92-158, 1992.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Kalkreuter, T., Idealized multigrid algorithm for staggered fermions, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 1926–1930.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Kaminsky, R., Multilevel Solution of the Long Transportation Problem, M.Sc. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, 1989.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Keller, J. B., Geometrical theory of diffraction, J. Optical Soc. Am. 52 (1962).Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Kogut, J. B., An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Modern Phys. 51 (1979) 659–713.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kogut, J. B., The lattice gauge theory approach to quantum chromodynamics, Rev. Modern Phys. 55 (1983) 775–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Kogut, J. B. and Susskind, L., Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 395–408.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Kohn, P. and Vogelius, M., Determining conductivity by boundary measurements, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 37 (1984) 289–298.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Kohn, W. and Sham, L. J., Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) A1133.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Li, Y. and Bates, J. R., A study of the behavior of semi-Lagrangian models in the presence of orography, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 122 (1996) 1675–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Li, Y., Ruge, J., Bates, J. R. and Brandt, A., A proposed adiabatic formulation of three-dimensional global atmospheric models based on potential vorticity, Tellus 52A (2000) 129–139.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Livne, O. E., Multiscale Eigenbasis Algorithms, Ph.D. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 2000.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Livne, O. E. and Brandt, A., O(N logN) multilevel calculation of N eigenfunctions, in [39], pp. 112-136. Also in the present volume.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Livne, O. and Brandt, A., N roots of secular equation in O(N) operations, submitted to SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Livshits, I., Multigrid Solvers for Wave Equations, Ph.D. Thesis (Brandt, A., supervisor), Bar-Ilan University, November 1995.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    McWilliams, J. C., Weiss, J. B. and Yavneh, I., Anisotropy and coherent vortex structures in planetary turbulence, Science 264(5157) (1994) 410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Melenk, J. M., On generalized finite element method, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland, 1995.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Melman, A., Numerical solution of a secular equation, Numer. Math. 69 (1995) 483–493.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Melman, A., A numerical comparison of methods for solving secular equations, J. Comp. Appl. Math. 86 (1997) 237–249.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Paul, W., Yoon, D. Y. and Smith, G. D., An optimized united atom model for simulations of polymethylene melts, J. Chem. Phys. 103 (1995) 1702–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Peskin, C. S. and Schlick, T., Molecular dynamics by backward-Euler method, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 42 (1989) 1001.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Ron, D. and Swendsen, R. H., Calculation of effective Hamiltonians for renormalized or non-Hamiltonian systems, Phys. Rev. E, to appear.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Rozantsev, M., Methods for Multigrid Solution of Quantum Electrodynamics Equations, M.Sc. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 1993.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Rozantsev, M., Multigrid Solver for 4D Quantum Chromodynamics Equations, Final Report, Feinberg Graduate School, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, January 1999.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Rozantsev, M., Multigrid Solver for 4D Quantum Chromodynamics Equations, Ph.D. Thesis, submitted to Feinberg Graduate School, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, February 2001.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Ruge, J. W., Li, Y., McCormick, S., Brandt, A. and Bates, J. R., A nonlinear multigrid solver for a semi-Lagrangian potential vorticity based shallow water model on the sphere, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21 (2000) 2381–2399.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Ruge, J. and Stüben, K., Algebraic multigrid, in: Multigrid Methods (McCormick, S. F., ed.), SIAM, Philadelphia, 1987, pp. 73–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Sandak, B. and Brandt, A., Multiscale fast summation of long range charge and dipolar interactions, in [39], pp. 6–31. J. Comp. Chem., in press.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Schmittmann, B. and Zia, R. K. P., Statistical Mechanics of Drivan Diffusive Systems, Academic Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  137. 137. Schröder, J., Trottenberg, U. and Reuterssberg, H., Reuktionsverfahren fuer differenzengleichungen bei randwertaufgaben II, Num. Math. 26 (1976) 429–459.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Sharatchandra, H., Thun, H. and Weisz, P., Susskind fermions on a Euclidean lattice, Nuc. Phys. B192 (1981) 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Sharon, E., Brandt, A. and Basri, R., Completion Energies and Scale, IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR-97), Puerto Rico, 1997. Report CS97-19, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Anal. and Machine Intelligence 22 (2000) 1117–1131.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Sharon, E., Brandt, A. and Basri, R., Fast multiscale image segmentation, IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and pattern recognition, South Carolina, 2000, pp. 70–77.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Shmulyian, F., Multigrid Algorithms for an Inverse Problem in Impedance Tomography, M.Sc. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, August 1995.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Shmulyian, S., Toward Optimal multigrid Monte Carlo Computations in Two-Dimensional O(N) Non-Linear σ-models, Ph.D. Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, March 1999.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Smith, G. D., Paul, W., Yoon, D. Y. and Richter, D., Microscopic Dynamics in a Long-chain Alkane Melt: Computer Simulation and Neutron Scattering, Report, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri at Columbia, July 1996.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Sonneveld, P., Wesseling, P. and de Zeeuw, P. M., Multigrid and conjugate gradient methods as convergence acceleration techniques, Proc. Multigrid Conf. (Holstein, H. and Paddon, D., eds.), Bristol, 1983.Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    South, J. C. and Brandt, A., Application of a multi-level grid method to transonic flow calculations, in: Transonic Flow Problems in Turbo Machinery (Adam, T. C. and Platzer, M. F., eds.), Hemisphere, Washington, 1977, pp. 180–207.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Stüben, K., Algebraic multigrid (AMG): An introduction with applications, Guest appendix in [153]. A review of algebraic multigrid, J. Comp. Appl. Math. 128(1–2), 2001.Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Susskind, L., Lattice fermions, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 3031–3039.Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Swendsen, R. H., Monte Carlo calculation of renormalized coupling parameters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1165.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Sylvester, J. and Uhlmann, G., A global uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem, Ann. Math. 125 (1987) 153–169.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150. Ta’asan, S., One-shot methods for optimal control of distributed parameter systems, I. Finite dimensional control, ICASE Report 91-2, 1991.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Thomas, J. L., Diskin, B. and Brandt, A., Textbook multigrid efficiency for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: High Reynolds number wakes and boundary layers, ICASE Report No. 99-51, 1999. Computers and Fluids, to appear.Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Thomas, J. L., Diskin, B., Brandt, A. and South, J. C. Jr., General framework for achieving textbook multigrid efficiency: quasi-1-D Euler example, in: Frontiers of Computational Fluid Dynamics — 2000 (Caughey, D. A. and Hafez, M. M., eds.), World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore.Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Trottenberg, U., Oosterlee, C. W. and Schüller, A., Multigrid, Academic Press, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Tziperman, E., Yavneh, I. and Ta’asan, S., Multilevel turbulence simulations, Europhysics Lett. 24(4) (1993) 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Van der Wees, A. J., Van der Vooren, J. and Meelker, J. H., Robust calculation of 3D transonic potential flow based on the nonlinear FAS multigrid method and incomplete LU-decomposition, AIAA Paper 83-1950, 1983.Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Vandewalle, S. and Horton, G., Fourier mode analysis of the waveform relaxation and time-parallel multigrid methods, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (1995).Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Van Leer, B., Tai, C. H. and Powell, K. G., Design of optimally-smoothing multi-stage schemes for the Euler equations, AIAA Paper 89-1933, June 1989.Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Venner, C. H. and Lubrecht, A. A., Multilevel Methods in Lubrication, Elsevier (Tribology Series, 37), Amsterdam, 2000.Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Wesseling, P. and Sonneveld, P., Numerical experiments with a multiple grid and a preconditioned Lanczos type method, in: Approximation Methods for Navier-Stokes Problems (Rautmann, R., ed.), Lecture Notes in Math. 771, Springer-Verlag, 1980, pp. 543–562.Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Whitham, G. B., Linear and Nonlinear Waves, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1974.MATHGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Williams, L. R. and Jacobs, D. W., Stochastic completion fields: A neural model of illusory contour shape and salience, ICCV-95, 1995, pp. 408–415.Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Wilson, K. G., Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 2445–2459.Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Yavneh, I., A method for devising efficient multigrid smoothers for complicated PDE systems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14 (1993), 1437–1463.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Yavneh, I. and McWilliams, J. C., Breakdown of the slow manifold in the shallow-water equations, Geo. Astr. Fluid Dyn. 75 (1994) 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Yavneh, I. and McWilliams, J. C., Robust multigrid solution of the shallow-water balance equations, J. Comput. Phys. 119 (1995) 1–25.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Yavneh, I., Venner, C. H. and Brandt, A., Fast multigrid solution of the advection problem with closed characteristics, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19 (1998) 111–125.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Zimare, H., Beweis der Sternenkonvergenz und Untersuchung der stabilitaet beim verfahren der totalen reduktion, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cologne, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Achi Brandt
    • 1
  1. 1.The Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations