A Parallel Quasi-Monte Carlo Method for Computing Extremal Eigenvalues
The convergence of Monte Carlo methods for numerical integration can often be improved by replacing pseudorandom numbers (PRNs) with more uniformly distributed numbers known as quasirandom numbers (QRNs). In this paper the convergence of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating the extremal eigenvalues of a given matrix is studied when quasirandom sequences are used. An error bound is established and numerical experiments with large sparse matrices are performed using three different QRN sequences: Sobol', Halton and Faure. The results indicate: • An improvement in both the magnitude of the error and in the convergence rate that can be achieved when using QRNs in place of PRNs. • The high parallel efficiency established for Monte Carlo methods is preserved for quasi-Monte Carlo methods in this case. The execution time for computing an extremal eigenvalue of a large, sparse matrix on p processors is bounded by O(lN/p), where l is the length of the Markov chain in the stochastic process and N is the number of chains, both of which are independent of the matrix size.
KeywordsAssure Libr Terion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.P. BRATLEY, B. L. FOX and H. NIEDERREITER, “Implementation and tests of low-discrepancy point sets,” ACM Trans. on Modeling and Comp. Simul., 2: 195–213, 1992Google Scholar
- 2.R. L. BURDEN and J. D. FAIRES, Numerical Analysis, Fifth Edition, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, California, 1996.Google Scholar
- 4.I. DIMOV, A. KARAIVANOVA, “Parallel computations of eigenvalues based on a Monte Carlo approach,” Journal of Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, Vol.4, Num.1, pp.33–52, 1998.Google Scholar
- 5.H. FAURE, “Discrepance de suites associées à un système de numération (en dimension s),” Acta Arithmetica, XLI: 337–351, 1982.Google Scholar
- 10.M. MASCAGNI, A. KARAIVANOVA and Y. LI, “A Quasi-Monte Carlo Method for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations,” Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, in the press, 2001.Google Scholar
- 11.M. MASCAGNI and A. KARAIVANOVA, “Are Quasirandom Numbers Good for Anything Besides Integration?” in Proceedings of Advances in Reactor Physics and Mathematics and Computation into the Next Millennium (PHYSOR2000), 2000.Google Scholar