Skip to main content

Constructing Utility Functions by Methods of Nondifferentiable Optimization

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 510))

Abstract

Methods of nonsmooth optimization, particularly the r-algorithm, are applied to the problem of fitting an empirical utility function to expert’s estimates of ordinal utility under certain a priori constraints. Due to these methods, the fit can be performed not only with respect to the least squares criterion but with respect to the least moduli criterion, and with respect to the minimax (Chebyshev) criterion as well. Besides, nonsmooth constraints, providing the convexity or concavity of the utility function, are manageable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agmon, D. (1954): “The relaxation method for linear inequalities,” Canad. J. Math., 6, 382–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, F.H. (1983): Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1952): “Definite and Semidefinite Quadratic Forms,” Econometrica, 20, 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demiyanov, V.F., and VASILIEV, L.V. (1985): Nondifferentiable Optimization, Optimization Software, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eremin, I.I. (1967): “On a penalty method in convex programming,” Kibernetika, No. 4, 63–67 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu.M. Ermoliev (1966): “Methods for solving nonlinear extremal problems,” Kibernetika, No. 4, 1–17 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu.M. Ermoliev (1976): Stochastic Programming Methods, Nauka, Moscow (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermoliev, YU. M., and N.Z. Shor (1968):“Method of random walk for the two-stage problem of stochastic programming and its generalization”, Kibernetika, 4(1), 59–60 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (1981): Robust Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khachiyan, L.G. (1979): “A polynomial algorithm in linear programming”, Soviet Math. (Doklady), 20, 191–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiwiel, K.C. (1985): Methods of Descend for Nondifferentiable Optimization, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1133, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarechal, C. (1975): “An extension of Davidon methods to nondifferentiable problems,” Math. Program. Study., 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motzkin, T., and I. Shoenberg (1954): “The relaxation method for linear inequalities,” Canad. J. Math., 6, 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polyak, B.T. (1967): “A general method of solving extremum problems,” Soviet Mathematics (Doklady), 8, 593–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pshenichny, B.N. (1983): Methods of linearization, Nauka, Moscow. (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R.T. (1970): Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, N.Z. (1962): “An application of the method of gradient descent to the solution of the network transportation problem,” in: Materialy Nauchnogo Seminara po Teoreticheskim i Prikladnym Voprosam Kibernetiki i Issledovaniu Operacii, Nauchnyi Sovet po Kibernetike Akademii Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, 1, 9–17 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, N.Z. (1964):“On the structure of algorithms for numerical solution of problems of optimal planning and design, “Diss. Doctor Philos., Kiev (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, N.Z. (1970): “On the speed of convergence of the method of generalized gradient descent with space dilation,” Kibernetika, No. 2, 80–85 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, N.Z. (1977): “Cut-off method with space dilation in convex programming problems,” Kibernetika, No. 13, 94–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, N.Z. (1985): Minimization Methods for Nondifferentiable Functions, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, N.Z. (1998): Nondifferentiable optimization and polynomial problems, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • V.I. Biletskii (1969): “A method of space dilation for accelerating convergence in gully-type problems.” In: Teor. Optimal Resenii, Trudy Sem. Nauchn. Soveta Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR po Kibernetike, 2, 3–18, Kiev (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • N.G. Zhurbenko (1971): “A minimization method using the operation of space dilation in the direction of the difference of two successive gradients”, Kibernetika, 3, 51–59 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • S.I. Stetsenko (1989): Quadratic extremal problems and nondifferentiable optimization, Naukova dumka, Kyiv (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangian, A.S. (1998): Constructing Quasi-Concave Quadratic Objective Functions, FernUniversität Hagen, Discussion Paper No. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangian, A.S. (2000): A Model for Constructing Monotonic Quasi-Concave Quadratic Utility Functions. FernUniversität Hagen, Discussion Paper No. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangian, A.S. (2001): “A unified model for cardinally and ordinally constructing quadratic objective functions,” elsewhere in the volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gruber (1997): “Constructing Quadratic and Polynomial Objective Functions,” in: Constructing Scalar-Valued Objective Functions, ed. by A.S. Tangian and J. Gruber, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 453, Springer, Berlin, 166–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, P. (1975): “A method of conjugate subgradient for minimizing nondifferentiable functions,” Math. Program. Study, 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yudin, D.B., and A.S. Nemirovski (1976): “Informational complexity and efficient methods for solving complex extremal problems,” Matekon 13(3), 25–45 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shor, N.Z., Stetsyuk, P.I. (2002). Constructing Utility Functions by Methods of Nondifferentiable Optimization. In: Tangian, A.S., Gruber, J. (eds) Constructing and Applying Objective Functions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 510. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56038-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56038-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42669-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56038-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics