Abstract
Several distinct intellectual communities are involved in modern developments in data analysis. Of these, perhaps the most important are statistics and computing science. These two disciplines have different emphases, different strengths, and different weaknesses. Statistical data analysis has the merit of a clear and principled theoretical base, but this has been earned at the cost of restricting the class of problems to which the methods may be applied. In contrast, data analysis derived from a computing science background often lacks a sound theoretical base, but this frees it to tackle a wider range of problems. This talk looks at the historical contexts from which the two approaches arose, and examines some of the similarities and differences between them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bailey, R. A.(1998) Statistics and mathematics: the appropriate use of mathematics within statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D, The Statistician, 47, 261–271.
Baudrillard, J.(1987) Cool memories. Galilee, Paris.
Belloc, H.(1940) The silence of the sea. Sheed and Wood, New York.
Box, G.(1996) Scientific statistics, teaching, learning and the computer. In Proc. Computational Statistics, ed. A. Prat, Physica, Heidelberg, 3–10.
Breiman, L.(1995) Reflections after refereeing papers for NIPS. In The Mathematics of Generalization, ed. D.H. Wolpert, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 11–15.
Breiman, L., Freidman, J. H., Olshen, R. A. and Stone, C. (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth: Belmont, California.
Chambers, J. M.(1993) Greater or lesser statistics: a choice for future research. Statistics and Computing, 3, 182–184.
Gifi, A.(1990) Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
Hacking, I.(1975) The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hand, D. J.(1998) Data mining: statistics and more? Tie American Statistician, 52, 112–118.
Hand, D. J.(1998b) Breaking misconceptions—statistics and its relationship to mathematics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D, The Statistician, 47, 245–250.
Hill, I. D.(1984) Statistical Society of London—Royal Statistical Society, the first 100 years: 1834-1934. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 147, 130–139.
Klein, H.A. (1974) The Science of Measurement. Dover: New York.
Nelder, J. A. (1986) Statistics, science, and technology. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 144, 289–297.
Quinlan, J. R. (1993) C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, California.
Seaton, G. L.(1948) The statistician and modern management. Tie American Statistician, 2, No. 6.
Senn, S.(1998) Mathematics: governess or handmaiden? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D, The Statistician, 47, 251–259.
Sprent, P.(1998) Statistics and mathematics-trouble at the interface? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D, The Statistician, 47, 239–244.
Stekel, W.(1931) Marriage at the crossroads. W.Godwin, Inc., New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hand, D.J. (2002). Modern Data Analysis: A Clash of Paradigms. In: Gaul, W., Ritter, G. (eds) Classification, Automation, and New Media. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55991-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55991-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43233-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55991-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive