## Abstract

Suppose *f(xl,x2*) ≥ 0 is a continuously differentiable function supported in the unit disk in the plane. Its symmetric decreasing rearrangement is the rotationally invariant function f*(x^{l},x^{2}) whose level sets are circles enclosing the same area as the level sets of *f*. Such rearrangement preserves L_{p} norms but decreases convex gradient integrals, e.g. ||∇||*||_{p} ≤ ||∇/||_{p} (1 ≤ *p* < ∞). Now suppose that fj(x1,x2) > 0 (j = 1,2,3,…) is a sequence of infinitely differentiable functions also supported in the unit disk which converge uniformly together with first derivatives to f. The symmetzed functions also converge uniformly. The real question is about convergence of the derivatives of the symmetrized functions. We announce that the derivatives of the symmetrized functions need not converge strongly, e.g. it can happen that ||∇fj*—∇f*||p →* 0 for every p. We further characterize exactly those f’s for which convergence is assured and for which it can fail

## Keywords

Unit Disk Differentiable Function Symmetrize Function Invariant Function Gradient Norm## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [AL]F. Almgren and E. Lieb,
*Symmetric decreasing rearrangement is sometimes continuous*(submitted).Google Scholar - [CJ]J-M. Coron,
*The continuity of the rearrangement in*W^{l,p}(R), Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Sér**4**11 (1984), 57–85.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [KB]B. Kawohl,
*Rearrangements and convexity of level sets in PDE*, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1150, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1985, 134 pp.Google Scholar - [LE]E. Lieb,
*Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities*, Ann. of Math. (2)**118**(1983), 349–374.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [PS]G. Pólya and G. Szegö,
*Isoperimetric inequalities in mathematical physics*, Ann. of Math. Studies no. 27, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J., 1952.Google Scholar - [RS]B. Ruf and S. Solimini,
*On a class of superlinear Sturm-Liouville problems with arbitrarily many solutions*, SIAM J. Math. Anal.**17**(1986), 761–771.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar