Advertisement

Periphervenöse Ernährung

  • B. Leube
  • J. Stein
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die periphere parenterale Ernährung wird — als eine mögliche Form der parenteralen Ernährung — in den letzten Jahren immer häufiger angewendet. Wesentlicher Vorteil der peripheren Applikation von Nährlösungen ist das Vermeiden von Komplikationen, die bei Verwendung zentralvenöser Katheter vorkommen, sowie eine deutliche Kosteneinsparung.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Allcutt DA, Lort D, McCollum CN (1983) Final inline filtration for intravenous infusions: a prospective hospital study. Br J Surg 70: 111–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anonymous (1993) Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN (J Parenter Enteral Nutr) 17: 1SA–26SACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collin J, Collin C, Constable FL, Johnston IDA (1975) Infusion thrombophlebitis and infection with various cannulas. Lancet II: 150–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Culebras JM, Garcia-de-Lorenzo A, Zarazaga A, Jorquera F (2000) Perripheral parenteral nutrition. In: Rombeau JL, Rollandelli RH (eds) Clinical nutrition. Parenteral nutrition. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 580–587Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniell HW (1973) Heparin in the prebention of infusion phlebitis. JAMA 226: 1317–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Everitt NJ, Madan M, Alexander DJ, McMahon MJ (1993) Fine bore silicone rubber and polyurethane catheters for the delivery of complete intravenous nutrition via a peripheral vein. Clin Nutr 12: 261–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Everitt NJ, Wong C, McMahon MJ (1996) Peripheral infusion as the route of choice for intravenous nutrition: a prospective two year study. Clin Nutr 15: 69–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Everitt NJ, Krupowicz DW, Evans JA, McMahon MJ (1997) Ultrasonographic investigation of tze pathogenesis of infusion thrombophlebitis. Br J Surg 84: 642–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Falchuk KH, Peterson L, McNeil BJ (1985) Microparticulate-induced phlebitis: Its prevention by in-line filtration. N Engl J Med 312: 78–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gazitua R, Wilson K, Bistrian BR, Blackburn GL (1979) Factors determining peripheral vein tolerance to amino acid infusion. Arch Surg 114: 897–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hessov I (1985) Prevention of infusion thrombophlebitis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 29: 33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hiremath AN, Hoffman BB, Blaschke TF (1989) Responsiveness of peripheral veins to transdermal and sublingual nitroglycerin in healthy male volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 14: 534–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isaacs JW, Millikan WJ, Stackhouse J et al. (1977) Parenteral nutrition of adults with a 900 milliosmolar solution via peripheral veins. Am J Clin Nutr 30: 552–559PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khawaja HT, Williams JD, Weaver PC (1991) Transdermal glyceryl trinitrate to allow peripheral total parenteral nutrition. J R Soc Med 84: 69–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kohlardt SR, Smith RC (1989) Fine bore silicon catheters for peripheral intravenous nutrition in adults. Br Med J 299: 1380–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linder LE, Curelaru I, Gustavsson B et al. (1984) Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: A comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane. JPEN (J Parenter Enteral Nutr) 8: 399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Linton DM, Bean E, Cronje CJ, Elliot MS, Wright J, Marquard FC (1983) Central venous catheterization for parenteral nutrition. S Afr Med J 64: 351–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madan M, Alexander DJ, Mellor E, Cooke J, McMahon MJ (1991) A randomized study of the effects of osmolality and heparin with hydrocortisone on thrombophlebitis in peripheral intravenous nutrition. Clin Nutr 10: 309–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madan M, Alexander DJ, McMahon MJ (1992) Influence of catheter type on occurence of thrombophlebitis during peripheral intravenous nutrition. Lancet 339: 101–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matsumoto M, Shirotani N, Kameoka S (1999) Clinical study on the ratio of glucose/fat in peripheral parenteral nutrition and the usage of a midline catheter. Surg Today 29: 1040–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matsusue S, Nishimura S, Koizumi S, Nakamura T, Takeda H (1995) Preventive effect of simultaneously infused lipid emulsion against thrombophlebitis during postoperative peripheral parenteral nutrition. Surg Today 25: 667–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mermel LA, Parenteau S, Tow SM (1995) The risk of midline catheterization in hospitalized Patients. Ann Intern Med 123: 841–844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mermel L (1997) Midline catheters: the final chapter. Ann Intern Med 126: 334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Messing B, Leverve X, Rigaud D et al.(1986) Peripheral venous complications of a hyperosmolar (969 mOsm) nutritive mixture: the effect of heparin and hydrocortison. Clin Nutr 5: 57–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mughal MM (1989) Complications of intravenous feeding catheters. Br J Surg 76: 15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nordenström J, Jeppsson B, Lovén L, Larsson J (1991) Peripheral parenteral nutrition: effect of a standardized compounded mixture on infusion phlebitis. Br J Surg 78: 1391–1394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Padberg FT jr., Ruggiero J, Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR (1981) Central venous catheterization for parenteral nutrition. Ann Surg 193: 264–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Payne-James JJ, Bray MJ, Kapadia S, Rana SK, Mcswiggan D, Silk DBA (1992) Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory gel for the prevention of peripheral vein thrombophlebitis. Anaethesia 47: 324–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Payne-James JJ, Khawaja HT (1993) First choice for total parenteral nutrition: the peripheral route. JPEN (J Parenter Enteral Nutr) 17: 468–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    RudinC (1990) A comparative study of two different percutaneous venous catheters in newborn infants. Eur J Paediatr 150: 119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schuberth O, Wretlind A (1961) Intravenous infusions of fat emulsions, phosphatides and amuklsifying agents. Acta Chir Scand 278: 1–21Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silverstein B, Witkin KM, Frankos VH, Terr AI (1997) Assessing the role of the biomaterial Aquavene in patient reactions to Landmark Midline Catheters. Regul Toxicol Pharma 25: 60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tanner WA, Delaney PV, Hennessy TP (1980) The influence of heparin on intravenous infusions: a prospective study. Br J Surg 67: 311–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thayssen P (1973) Postinfusion phlebitis and the calibre of the catheter. Ugeskr Laeg 135: 1238–1241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tomford JW, Hershey CO, McLaren CE, Porter DK, Cohen DI (1984) Intravenous therapy team and peripheral venous catheter-associated complications. Arch Intern Med 144: 1191–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Welch GW, McKeel DW, Silverstein P et al. (1974) The role of catheter composition in the development of thrombophlebitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 138: 421–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wolfe BM, Ryder MA, Nishikawa RA, Halsted CH, Schmidt BF (1986) Complications of parenteral nutrition Am J Surg 152: 93–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Leube
  • J. Stein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations