Multibody Dynamics

  • Vjekoslav Damić
  • John Montgomery


There is an extremely large body of literature dealing with the modelling and simulation of multibody systems, e.g. [1–7]. The importance of multi-body systems is also recognized in robotics where different approaches have been developed taking into account the control aspect as well [8, 9]. The modelling of multibody systems has attracted attention in bond graph theory, too. The models are based on field multiport elements and multibonds [10–12].


Multibody System Revolute Joint Body Frame Multibody Dynamics Base Frame 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J Wittenburg (1977) Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies. BG Teubner, StuttgartCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    EJ Haug (1989) Computer-Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W Schiehlen (1990) Multibody Systems Handbook. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R von Schwerin (1991) Multibody System Simulation: Numerical methods, Algorithms, and Software. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AA Shabana (1998) Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    PJ Rabier and WC Rheinboldt (2000) Nonholonomic Motion of Rigid mechanical Systems From a DAE Viewpoint. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M Borri, L Trainelli and CL Bottasso (2000) On representation and Parameterizations of Motions. Multibody Systems Dynamics 4: 129–193MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    JJ Craig (1986) Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L Sciavicco and B Siciliano (1996) Modeling and Control of Robot Manipulators. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pieter C Breedveld (1984) Physical systems Theory in Terms of Bond Graphs, PhD thesis, Technische Hochschool Twente, EntschedeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dean C Karnopp, Donal L Margolis and Ronald C Rosenberg (2000) System Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fahrenthold EP and Wargo JD (1994) Lagrangian Bond Graphs for Solid Continuum Dynamics Modeling. ASME J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 116: 178–192CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E Hairer and G Wanner (1996) Solving ordinary Differential Equations II, Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems, 2nd Revisited edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    WM Lioen and JJB Swart Test Set for Initial Value Problem Solvers, Amsterdam. Available at
  15. 15.
    JP Den Hartog (1956) Mechanical Vibrations, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    CH Pan and JJ Moskwa (1996) An Analysis of the Effects of Torque, Engine Geometry, and Speed on Choosing an Engine Inertia Model to Minimize Prediction Errors, ASME J. of Dynamic Syst., Meas., and Control, 118:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    DC Hesterman and BJ Stone (1994) A Systematic Approach to the Torsional Vibration of Multi-cylinder Reciprocating Engines and Pumps, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engers. 208:395–408Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    V Damić and P Kesic (1997) A System Approach to Modelling and Simulation of Multibody Systems Using Acausal Bond Graphs. In P Marovic, J Soric and N Vrankovic (eds.) Proc. of the 2nd Congress of Croatian Society of Mechanics, Supetar, Croatia, pp 415–422Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V Damić, J Montgomery and N Koboevic (1998) Application of Automated Modelling in Design. In P Marjanovic (ed.) Proc. 5th International Design Conf., Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 111–116Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G Ferretti, G Magnani and P Rocco (1995) On Stability of Integral Force Control in Case of Contact with Stiff Surface, ASME J. of Dynamic Syst., Meas., and Control, 117:547–553CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    KP Junkowski, HA ElMaraghy (1996) Constraint Formulation for Invariant Hybrid Position/Force Control of Robots, ASME J. of Dynamic Syst., Meas., and Control, 118:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J De Schutter, D Torfs, H Bruyninckx and S Dutre (1997) Invariant Hybrid Force/Position Control of a Velocity Controlled Robot with Compliant End Effector Using Modal decoupling, The Int. J. of Robotic Research, 16:340–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V Damić (1987) An Approach to Computer Aided Design of Industrial Robots Using Simulation Package Simulex. In M. Vukobratovic (ed) Proc of 5th Yugoslav Symposium on Applied Robotics and Flexible Automatization, Bled, pp 28–39Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    F Harashima, J Hu, H Hashimoto and T Ichiyama (1986) Tracking Control of Robot Manipulator Using Slide Mode. In Proceedings of 15th International Symposium On Industrial Robotics, Tokyo, pp. 661–662Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vjekoslav Damić
    • 1
  • John Montgomery
    • 2
  1. 1.The Polytechnic of Dubrovnik Collegium RagusinumDubrovnikCroatia
  2. 2.The Nottingham Trent UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations