Taxonomy Rules and Classification Hints for Non-Taxonomists Working with Unknown or JII-Identified Yeast Cultures

  • Alessandro Martini
  • Ann Elizabeth Vaughan
  • Gianluigi Cardinali
Part of the Springer Lab Manuals book series (SLM)


The identification of yeast cultures may be achieved by different procedures, all complying with the internationally accepted rules of a code for botanical nomenclature. The most relevant of the above regulations will be discussed together with an evaluation of the principal strategies of identification and tips on practically approaching the problem of accessing strains identified with certainty.


Yeast Species Kluyveromyces Marxianus Molecular Taxonomy Debaryomyces Hansenii Botanical Nomenclature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashby SF, Nowell W (1926) The fungi of sterigmatomycosis. Ann Bot 40:69–84Google Scholar
  2. Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D (1990) Yeasts: characteristics and identification, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutroux L (1884) Sur la conservation des ferments alcoholiques dans la nature. Ann Sei Nat Sér VI 17:144–209Google Scholar
  4. Cardinali G, Liti G, Martini A (2000) Non-radioactive dot-blot DNA reassociation for unequivocal yeast identification. Int Syst Evol Microbiol 50:931–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dombrowski W (1910) Die Hefen in Milch und Milchprodukten. Zentralbl Bakteriol ParasitenkdAbt II 28:345–403Google Scholar
  6. Drake JW (1991) A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc Nati Acad Sei USA 88:7160–7164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fell JW (1993) Rapid identification of yeast species using three primers in a polymerase chain reaction. Mol Marine Biol Biotechnol 2:174–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greuter W, Barrie F, Bürdet HM, Chaloner WG, Demoulin V, Hawksworth DL, Jorgensen PM, Nicolson DH, Silva P, Trehane P, McNeill J (1994) International code of botanical nomenclature. IC of BN. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigsberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Guilliermond A (1912) Les levures. Octave Doin, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  10. Guilliermond A (1919) Sur une nouvelle levure à copulation hétérogamique. CR Soc Biol 82:466–470Google Scholar
  11. Guilliermond A (1928) Recherches sur quelques Ascomycètes inférieurs isolés de la stygmatomycose des grains de cotonnier: essai sul la phylogénie des Ascomycètes. Rev Gen Bot 40:328–342, 397-414, 555-574, 606-624, 690-704Google Scholar
  12. Kloecker A (1909) Deuw nouveaux genres de la famille des Saccharomycètes. CR Trav Lab Carlsberg 7:273–278Google Scholar
  13. Komagata K, Nakase T, Katsuya N (1964) Assimilation of hydrocarbons by yeast. II. Determination of hydrocarbon assimilating yeasts. J Gen Appl Microbiol 10:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kreger-van Rij NJW (1984) The yeasts — a taxonomic study. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Kurtzman CP (1984) Synonymy of the yeast genera Hansenula and Pichia demonstrated through comparision of deoxyribonucleic acid. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 50:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurtzman CP, Phaff HJ (1987) Molecular taxonomy. In: Rose AH, Harrison AJS (eds) The yeasts: biology of yeasts. Academic Press, New York, pp 63–94Google Scholar
  17. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (1991) Phylogenetic relationships among species of Saccha-romyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Debaryomyces and Schwanniomyces determined from partial ribosomal RNA sequences. Yeast 7:61–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kurtzman CP (1995) Relationships among the genera Ashbya, Eremothecium, Holleya and Nematospora determined from rDNA divergence. J Ind Microbiol 14:523–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (1998) The yeasts — a taxonomic study, 4th edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ (1998) Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73:331–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindner P (1894) Saccharomyces farinosus und Saccharomyces bailii. Zwei neue Hefearten aus Danzinger Jopenbier. Wochenschr Brau 11:153–156Google Scholar
  22. Lodder J, Kreger-van Rij NJW (1952) The yeasts — a taxonomic study. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. Lodder JE (1970) The yeasts, a taxonomic study. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  24. Martini A, Vaughan-Martini A (1990) Grape must fermentation: past and present. In: Spencer JFT, Spencer DM (eds) Yeast technology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 105–123Google Scholar
  25. Middlehoven, WJ, Hoogkamer-Te Niet MC, Kreger van Rij NJW (1984) Trichosporon adeni-novorans sp. nov., a yeast species utilising adenine, xantin, uric acid, putrescin and primary tt-alkylamine as sole source of carbon, nitrogen and energy. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 50:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller MW, Yoneyama M, Soneda M (1976) Phaffia. A new yeast genus in the Deuteromycotina (Blastomycetes). Int J Syst Bacteriol 26:286–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakase T, Fukazawa Y, Tsuchiya T (1972) A comparative study of two forms of Candida tropicalis (Cast) Berkhout. J Gen Appl Microbiol 18:349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakase T, Suzuki M (1985) Taxonomic studies on Debaryomyces hansenii (Zopf) Lodder et Kreger-van Rij and related species. II. Practical discrimination and nomenclature. J Gen Appl Microbiol 31:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ota M (1924) Über vier neue patogene Hefearten von der Gattung Debaryomyces (Kloecker). Dermatol Wochenschr 78:284–289, 312-316Google Scholar
  30. Phaff HJ (1956) A proposal for amendment of the diagnosis of the genus Pichia. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 22:113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pignal M-C (1967) Une nouvelle espèce de levure isolée des larves d’insectes: Pichia stipi-tis. Bull Mens Soc Linn Lyon 36:163–168Google Scholar
  32. Price C, Fusion GB, Phaff HJ (1977) Trends in yeast systematics: molecular approaches. 5th Int Spec Symp Yeasts, Vienna, Austria, pp 1–35Google Scholar
  33. Scheda R, Yarrow D (1966) The instability of physiological properties used as criteria in the taxonomy of yeasts. Arch Microbiol 55:209–225Google Scholar
  34. Scheda R, Yarrow D (1968) Variation in the fermentative pattern of some Saccharomyces species. Arch Microbiol 61:310–316Google Scholar
  35. Sidenberg DG, Lachance MA (1986) Electrophoretic isoenzyme variation in Kluyveromyces populations and revision of Kluyveromyces marxianus (Hansen) van der Walt. Int J Syst Bacteriol 36:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stelling-Dekker NM (1931) Die sporogenen Hefen. Verh Ned Akad Wet Afd Natuur Sect II 28:1–47Google Scholar
  37. Teunisson DJ, Hall HH, Wickerham LJ (1960) Hansenula augusta, an excellent species for the demonstration of the coexistence of haploid and diploid cells in homothallic yeasts. Mycologia 52:184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van der Walt JP (1971) New combinations of the genera Brettanomyces, Kluyveromyces, Lodderomyces and Wingea. Bothalia 10:417–418Google Scholar
  39. van der Walt JP, von Arx JA (1980) The yeast genus Yarrowia gen. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 46:517–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Walt JP, Smith MTh, Yamada Y (1990) Arxula gen nov (Candidaceae) a new anamorphic, arthoconidial yeast genus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 57:59–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. von Arx JA, Rodrigues de Miranda L, Smith MTh, Yarrow D (1977) The genera of yeasts and yeast-like fungi. Stud Mycol 14:1–42Google Scholar
  42. Vaughan-Martini A, Martini A (1993) A taxonomic key for the genus Saccharomyces. Syst Appl Microbiol 16:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wickerham LJ (1951) Taxonomy of yeasts. Tech Bull US Dept Agrie WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  44. Wickerham LJ, Burton KA (1948) Carbon assimilation tests for the classification of yeasts. J Bacteriol 56:363–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wickerham LJ, Kurtzman CP, Hernán AI (1970) Sexual reproduction in Candida lipolytica. Science 167:1141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yarrow D, Meyer SA (1978) Proposal for amendment of the diagnosis of the genus Candida Berkhout nom. cons. Int J Syst Bacteriol 28:611–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yarrow D (1984) Saccharomyces, Meyen ex Reess. In: Rij NJWK-v (ed) The yeasts — a taxonomic study. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 379–395Google Scholar
  48. Zopft W (1889) Oxalsäuregährung (an Stelle von Alcoholgährung) bei einem typischen (endosporen) Saccharomyceten (S. hansenü n. spec). Ber Deutsch Bot Ges 7:94–97Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Martini
    • 1
  • Ann Elizabeth Vaughan
    • 1
  • Gianluigi Cardinali
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpt. Biologia Végétale e Biotecnologie Agroambientali Sezione Microbiología ApplicataPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations