Spatial Smoothing with Robust Priors in Functional MRI

  • L. Fahrmeir
  • C. Gössl
  • A. Hennerfeind
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)


Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has led to rapid advances in human brain mapping. The statistical assessment of brain areas that are activated by a particular stimulus requires elaborate models and efficient algorithms. Based on regressionmodels of the observedMR signals on the presented stimulus, pixelwise and spatial techniques have been applied. Besides describing the stimulus dependence of the MR signal, the latter also include spatial correlations between neighboring areas in the brain. In a Bayesian context mostly Gaussian Markov random field priors are used for this purpose, possibly blurring the smoothed images. To preserve potentially existing edges, this article presents some robust alternatives to the Gaussian choice. Inference is based on MCMC techniques. The performance of the new approaches will be demonstrated for simulated as well as for real data.


Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging fMRI Data Markov Random Field Observation Model Spatial Smoothing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BESAG, J., GREEN, P., HIGDON, D. and MENGERSEN, K. (1995): Bayesian Computation and Stochastic Systems. Statistical Science 10, 3–66.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BESAG, J., YORK, J., and MOLLIE, A. (1991): Bayesian image restoration with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43–1, 1-59.Google Scholar
  3. FRISTON, K. J., HOLMES, A. P., WORSLEY, K. J., POLINE, J.-B., WILLIAMS, S. C. R. and FRACKOWIAK, R. S. J. (1994): Analysis of functional MRI time-series. Human Brain Mapping, 1, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. GEMAN, S. and MCCLURE, D. E. (1987): Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, LII-4, 5–21.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. GÖSSL, C. (2001): Bayesian Models in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Approaches for Human Brain Mapping, Dissertation, Dept. of Statistics, Univ. of Munich, to appear in Shaker Verlag, Aachen.Google Scholar
  6. GÖSSL, C., AUER, D. P., and FAHRMEIR, L. (2001): Bayesian spatiotemporal inference in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biometrics, In Press.Google Scholar
  7. GÖSSL, C., FAHRMEIR, L. and AUER, D. P. (2001): Bayesian Modeling of Hemodynamic Response Function in BOLD fMRI, NeuroImage, to appear.Google Scholar
  8. HENNERFEIND, A. (2000): Bayesianische kantenerhaltende Glättung, Diplomarbeit, Dept. of Statistics, Univ. of Munich.Google Scholar
  9. KÜNSCH, H. R. (1994): Robust priors for smoothing and image restoration. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 46, 1, 1-19.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. LANGE, N. (1996): Statistical approaches to human brain mapping by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Statistics in Medicine, 15, 389–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Fahrmeir
    • 1
  • C. Gössl
    • 2
  • A. Hennerfeind
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institute of PsychiatryMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations