Advertisement

Nuclear-matter distributions of halo nuclei from elastic proton scattering in inverse kinematics

  • P. Egelhof
  • G. D. Alkhazov
  • M. N. Andronenko
  • A. Bauchet
  • A. V. Dobrovolsky
  • S. Fritz
  • G. E. Gavrilov
  • H. Geissel
  • C. Gross
  • A. V. Khanzadeev
  • G. A. Korolev
  • G. Kraus
  • A. A. Lobodenko
  • G. Münzenberg
  • M. Mutterer
  • S. R. Neumaier
  • T. Schäfer
  • C. Scheidenberger
  • D. M. Seliverstov
  • N. A. Timofeev
  • A. A. Vorobyov
  • V. I. Yatsoura
Conference paper

Abstract

Proton-nucleus elastic scattering at intermediate energies, a well-established method for probing nuclear-matter density distributions of stable nuclei, was applied for the first time to exotic nuclei. This method is demonstrated to be an effective means for obtaining accurate and detailed information on the size and radial shape of halo nuclei. Absolute differential cross-sections for small-angle scattering were measured at energies near 700 MeV/u for the neutron-rich helium isotopes 6He and 8He, and more recently for the lithium isotopes 6Li, 8Li, 9Li and 11Li, using He and Li beams provided by the fragment separator FRS at GSI Darmstadt. Experiments were performed in inverse kinematics using the hydrogen-filled ionization chamber IKAR which served simultaneously as target and recoil-proton detector. For deducing nuclear-matter distributions, differential cross-sections calculated with the aid of the Glauber multiple-scattering theory, using various parametrizations for the nucleon density distributions as input, were fitted to the experimental cross-sections. The results on nuclear-matter radii and matter distributions are presented, and the significance of the data for a halo structure is discussed. Nuclear-matter distributions obtained for 6He and 8He conform with the concept that both nuclei compose of α-particle like cores and significant neutron halos. The matter distribution in 11Li exhibits, as expected from previous reaction cross-section studies with nuclear targets, the by far most extended halo component of all nuclei being investigated. In addition the present data allow a quantitative comparison of the structure of the He and Li isobares of either the mass number A = 6 or A = 8. The measured differential cross-sections have also been used for probing density distributions as predicted from various microscopic calculations. A few examples are presented.

PACS

21.10.Gv Mass and neutron distributions 25.40.Cm Elastic proton scattering 27.20.+n 5 ≤ A ≤ 19 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.W. Negele et al., Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19, 1 (1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2676 (1985); Phys. Lett. B 160, 380 (1985); Nucl. Phys. A 488, 113c (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Riisager, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1105 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.G. Hansen et al., Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 45, 591 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Tanihata, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 35, 505 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Tanihata, J. Phys. G 22, 157 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Johnson et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 358, 2063 (1998).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Egelhof, Acta Phys. Pol. B 30, 487 (1999) and references therein.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.D. Alkhazov et al., Phys. Rep. C 42, 89 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Korsheninikov et al., Nucl. Phys. A 617, 45 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Cortina-Gil et al., Phys. Lett. B 401, 9 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Wolski et al., Phys. Lett. B 467, 8 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Lagoyannis et al., Phys. Lett. B 518, 27 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.D. Alkhazov et al., to be published in Nucl. Phys. A (2002).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Egelhof et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46, 307 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.D. Alkhazov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2313 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.R. Neumaier et al., to be published in Nucl. Phys. A (2002).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Dobrovolsky et al., in preparation.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G.C. Li et al., Nucl. Phys. A 162, 583 (1971); H. de Vries et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 36, 495 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Lett. B 289, 261 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Lett. B 206, 592 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.S. Al-Khalili et al., Phys. Rev. C 54, 1843 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.A. Tostevin et al., Nucl. Phys. A 616, 418c (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    W.R. Gibbs et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1395 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Wurzer, Diploma thesis, University Erlangen (1994)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Tomaselli et al., in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Physics at the Borderlines, Lipary, Italy (2001) (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002) p. 336, ISBN 981-02-4778-8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    I.J. Thompson et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, 1904 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. Lenske et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46, 187 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    O. Kisselev, F. Aksouh et al., contribution to this volume.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Egelhof
    • 1
  • G. D. Alkhazov
    • 2
  • M. N. Andronenko
    • 2
  • A. Bauchet
    • 1
  • A. V. Dobrovolsky
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Fritz
    • 1
  • G. E. Gavrilov
    • 2
  • H. Geissel
    • 1
  • C. Gross
    • 1
  • A. V. Khanzadeev
    • 2
  • G. A. Korolev
    • 2
  • G. Kraus
    • 1
  • A. A. Lobodenko
    • 2
  • G. Münzenberg
    • 1
  • M. Mutterer
    • 3
  • S. R. Neumaier
    • 1
  • T. Schäfer
    • 1
  • C. Scheidenberger
    • 1
  • D. M. Seliverstov
    • 2
  • N. A. Timofeev
    • 2
  • A. A. Vorobyov
    • 2
  • V. I. Yatsoura
    • 2
  1. 1.Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI)DarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI)GatchinaRussia
  3. 3.Institut für Kernphysik (IKP)Technische UniversitätDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations