Multifidelity Global Optimization Using DIRECT

  • Steven E. Cox
  • Raphael T. Haftka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 30)


Multifidelity global optimization methods have the potential to allow the optimization of problems which are computationally expensive and have high dimensionality. The DIRECT algorithm has been modified to incorporate multifidelity information. Two correction strategies have been employed with problems with up to ten dimensions and thousands of local optima. DIRECT has demonstrated the ability to reach the same global optimum using high fidelity analyses or corrected low fidelity function values. Initial work with two correction strategies have shown a minor reduction in the number of high-fidelity analyses required but refinements to the stopping criteria have the potential for greatly reducing the cost of the optimization.


Response Surface Design Space Direct Algorithm Entire Design Space Lipschitzian Optimization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Haftka, R. T. “Combining global and local approximations.” AIAA Journal, Vol. 29, No.9, 1991, pp. 1523–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mcquade, P.D., Eberhardt, S. and Livne, E., “CFD-Based Aerodynamic Approximation Concepts Optimization of a Two-Dimensional Scramjet Vehicle”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 32, NO.2, March–April 1995, pp. 262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexandrov, N. M., Dennis, J. E., Lewis, R M., and Torczon, V., “A Trustregion Framework for Managing the use of Approximation Models in Optimization”, Structural Optimization, Vol 15, 1998, pp. 16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Floudas C.A. and Pardalos P.M. (1996), State of the Art in Global Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramrez-Rosado, I. J. and Bernal-Augustn, “Genetic Algorithms Applied to the Design of Large Power Distribution Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 13, NO.2, May 1998, pp. 696–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamberti, L., Venkataraman, S., Haftka, R T. and Johnson, T. F., “Preliminary Design Optimization of Stiffened Panels Using Approximate Analysis Models”, Submitted For Review to the International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swift, R A. and Batill, S. M., “Simulated Annealing Utilizing Neural Networks for Discrete Variable Optimization Problems in Structural Design”,33rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Dallas, TX, April 1992, pp. 2536–2544Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones, D.R., Perttunen, C.D., Stuckman, RE. (1993), “Lipschitzian Optimization Without the Lipschitz Constant”,Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, Vol.79, pp. 157–181.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baker, C. A., Grossman, B., Haftka, R T., Mason, W. H. and Watson, L. T., “HSCT Configuration Design Space Exploration using Aerodynamic Response Surface Approximations”, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St Louis, Missouri, Sept. 2–4, 1998, pp. 769–777, AIAA Paper-98-4803Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishikawa, T., Tsukui, Y. and Matsunami, M., “A Combined Method for the Global Optimization Using Radial Basis Function and Deterministic Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 35, NO.3, May 1999, pp. 1730–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M. and Welch, W. J., “Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions”,Journal of Global Optimization, Vol.13, 1998, pp.455–492MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knill, D. L., Giunta, A. A., Baker, C. A., Grossman, B., Mason, W. H., Haftka, R T. and Watson, L. T. “Response surface model combining linear and euler aerodynamics for super sonic transport design.” Journal of Aircraft; Vol. 36, No.1, 1999, pp. 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cox, S., Haftka, R.T., Baker, C., Grossman, B., Mason, W. and Watson, L. T., “Global Multidisciplinary Optimization of a High Speed Civil Transport”.Proc. Aerospace Numerical Simulation Symposium’ 99, Tokyo, Japan, June, 1999, pp. 23–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven E. Cox
    • 1
  • Raphael T. Haftka
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesville

Personalised recommendations