Abstract
Ever since the invention of radar during the Second World War, scientists and engineers have strived not only to detect but also to identify unknown objects through the use of electromagnetic waves. Indeed, as pointed out in [19], “Target identification is the great unsolved problem. We detect almost everything; we identify nothing”. A significant step forward in the resolution of this problem occurred in the 1960's with the invention of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and since that time numerous striking successes have been recorded in imaging by electromagnetic waves using SAR [1], [7]. However, as the demands of randar imaging have increased, the limitations of SAR have become increasingly apparent. These limitations arise from the fact that SAR is based on the “weak scattering” approximation and ignores polarisation effects. Indeed, such incorrect model assumptions have caused some scientists to ask “how (and if) he complications associated with radar based automatic target recognition can be surmounted” ([1], p. 5).
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Air Force Office of Scientific
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Research.
B. Borden, Radar Imaging of Airborne Targets, IOP Publishing, Bristol, 1999.
F. Cakoni and D. Colton, Combined far field operators in electromagnetic inverse scattering theory. Math. Methods Applied Science, to appear.
F. Cakoni and D. Colton, A uniqueness theorem for an inverse electromagnetic scattering problem in inhomogeneous anisotropic media, Proc. Edin. Math. Soc, to appear.
F. Cakoni, D. Colton and P. Monk, The electromagnetic inverse scattering problem for partially coated Lipschitz domains, to appear.
O. Cessenat, Application d'une nouvelle formulation variationnelle aux équations d'ondes harmoniques. Problèmes de Helmholtz 2D et de Maxwell 3D, PhD thesis. Université Paris IX Dauphine, 1996.
O. Cessenat and B. Després, Application of the ultra-weak variational formulation of elliptic PDEs to the 2-dimensional Helmholtz problem, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 35 (1998), 255–299.
M. Cheney, A mathematical tutorial on synthetic aperture radar, SIAM Review 43 (2001), 301–312.
D. Colton, J. Coyle, and P. Monk, Recent developments in inverse acoustic scattering theory, SIAM Review, 42 (2000), 369–414.
D. Colton, H. Haddar and P. Monk, The linear sampling method for solving the electromagnetic inverse scattering problem, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 12 (2002), 719–731.
D. Colton and A. Kirsch, A simple method for solving inverse scattering problems in the resonance region. Inverse Problems, 12 (1996), 383–393.
D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, Springer-Veriag, New York, Second Edition, 1998.
D. Colton and L. Päivärinta, Far field patterns and the inverse scattering problem for electromagnetic waves in an inhomogeneous medium, Malh. Proc. Comb. Phil. Soc. 103 (1988), 561–575.
D. Colton and L. Päivärinta, The uniqueness of a solution to an inverse scattering problem for electromagnetic waves, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 119 (1992), 59–70
D. Colton, M. Piana and R. Potthast, A simple method using Morozov’s discrepancy principle for solving inverse scattering problems. Inverse Problems, 13 (1997), 1477–1493.
O. Dorn, H. Bertete-Aguirre, J.G. Berryman and G. C. Papanicolaou, A nonlinear inversion method for 3D-electromagnetic imaging using adjoint fields. Inverse Problems 15 (1999), 1523–1558.
M. Haas, W. Rieger, W. Rucker and G. Lehner, Inverse 3D acoustic and electromagnetic obstacle scattering by iterative adaption, in Inverse Problems of Wave Propagation and Diffraction, G. Chavent and P. Sabatier, eds., Springer-Vertag, Heidelberg, 1997, 204–215.
H. Haddar and P. Monk, The linear sampling method for solving the electromagnetic inverse medium problem, Inverse Problems 18 (2002), 891–906.
P. Hähner, Electromagnetic wave scattering: theory, in Scattering, R. Pike and P. Sabatier, eds., Academic Press, London, 2002, 211–229.
A. E. Hooper and H. N. Hambric, Unexploded ordinance (UXO)): The problem, in Detection and Identification of Visually Obscured Targets, C. E. Baum, ed., Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, 1999 1–8.
T. Huttunen, P Monk and J.P. Kaipio, Computational Aspects of the Ultra Weak Variational Formulation, J. Comput. Phys, 182 (2002), 27–46.
A. Kirsch and R. Kress, Uniqueness in inverse obstacle scattering, Inverse Problems, 9 (1993), 285–299.
R. Kress, Electromagnetic wave scattering: theory, in Scattering, R. Pike and P. Sabatier, eds., Academic Press, London, 2002, 191–210.
P. Maponi, M. Recchioni and F. Zirilli, The use of optimization in the reconstruction of obstacles from acoustic or electromagnetic scattering data, in Large Scale Optimization with Applications, Part I: Optimization in Inverse Problems and Design, L. Biegler, et. al. eds., IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 92, Springer, New York, 1997, 81–100.
P. Monk, Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
J. C. Nédélec, Acoustic and Electromagnetic Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001.
P. Ola, L. Päivärinta, and E. Somersalo, An inverse boundary value problem in electrodynamics, Duke Math. Jour. 70 (1993) 617–653.
P. Ola and E. Somersalo, Electromagnetic inverse problems and generalized Sommerfeld potentials, SIAM J Appl. Math. 56 (1996), 1129–1145.
R. Potthast, Point Sources and Multipoles in Inverse Scattering Theory, Research Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 427, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 2001.
Z. Sun and G. Uhlmann, An inverse boundary value problem for Maxwell’s equations. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 119 (1992), 71–93.
R. Womersley and I. Sloan, How good can polynomial interpolation on the sphere be?, Advances in Computational Mathematics, 14 (2001), 195–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colton, D., Monk, P. (2003). Herglotz Wave Functions in Inverse Electromagnetic Scattering Theory. In: Ainsworth, M., Davies, P., Duncan, D., Rynne, B., Martin, P. (eds) Topics in Computational Wave Propagation. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55483-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55483-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00744-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55483-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive