Abstract
This chapter is organized as three parts: in the first part, the vibroacoustic performance of a rectangular double-panel partition with enclosed air cavity and simply mounted on an infinite acoustic rigid baffle is investigated analytically. The sound velocity potential method rather than the commonly used cavity modal function method is employed, which possesses good expandability and has significant implications for further vibroacoustic investigations. The simply supported boundary condition is accounted for by using the method of modal function, and double Fourier series solutions are obtained to characterize the vibroacoustic behaviors of the structure. Results for sound transmission loss (STL), panel vibration level, and sound pressure level are presented to explore the physical mechanisms of sound energy penetration across the finite double-panel partition. Specifically, focus is placed upon the influence of several key system parameters on sound transmission, including the thickness of air cavity, structural dimensions, and the elevation angle and azimuth angle of the incidence sound. Further extensions of the sound velocity potential method to typical framed double-panel structures are also proposed.
In the second part, the air-borne sound insulation performance of a rectangular double-panel partition clamp mounted on an infinite acoustic rigid baffle is investigated both analytically and experimentally, and compared with that of a simply supported one. With the clamped (or simply supported) boundary accounted for by using the method of modal function, a double series solution for the sound transmission loss (STL) of the structure is obtained by employing the weighted residual (Galerkin) method. Experimental measurements with Al double-panel partitions having air cavity are subsequently carried out to validate the theoretical model for both types of the boundary condition, and good overall agreement is achieved. A consistency check of the two different models (based separately on clamped modal function and simply supported modal function) is performed by extending the panel dimensions to infinite where no boundaries exist. The significant discrepancies between the two different boundary conditions are demonstrated in terms of the STL versus frequency plots as well as the panel deflection mode shapes.
In the third part, an analytical model for sound transmission through a clamped triple-panel partition of finite extent and separated by two impervious air cavities is formulated. The solution derived from the model takes the form of that for a clamp-supported rectangular plate. A set of modal functions (or more strictly speaking, the basic functions) are employed to account for the clamped boundary conditions, and the application of the virtual work principle leads to a set of simultaneous algebraic equations for determining the unknown modal coefficients. The sound transmission loss (STL) of the triple-panel partition as a function of excitation frequency is calculated and compared with that of a double-panel partition. The model predictions are then used to explore the physical mechanisms associated with the various dips on the STL versus frequency curve, including the equivalent “mass-spring” resonance, the standing-wave resonance, and the panel modal resonance. The asymptotic variation of the solution from a finite-sized partition to an infinitely large partition is illustrated in such a way as to demonstrate the influence of the boundary conditions on the soundproofing capability of the partition. In general, a triple-panel partition outperforms a double-panel partition in insulating the incident sound, and the relatively large number of system parameters pertinent to the triple-panel partition in comparison with that of the double-panel partition offers more design space for the former to tailor its noise reduction performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Grosveld F (1992) Plate acceleration and sound transmission due to random acoustic and boundary-layer excitation. AIAA J 30(3):601–607
Maury C, Gardonio P, Elliott SJ (2002) Model for active control of flow-induced noise transmitted through double partitions. AIAA J 40(6):1113–1121
Pietrzko SJ, Mao Q (2008) New results in active and passive control of sound transmission through double wall structures. Aerosp Sci Technol 12(1):42–53
Wu SF, Wu G, Puskarz MM et al (1997) Noise transmission through a vehicle side window due to turbulent boundary layer excitation. J Vib Acoust 119(4):557–562
Quirt JD (1982) Sound transmission through windows I. Single and double glazing. J Acoust Soc Am 72(3):834–844
Quirt JD (1983) Sound transmission through windows II. Double and triple glazing. J Acoust Soc Am 74(2):534–542
Lyle K, Mixson J (1987) Laboratory study of sidewall noise transmission and treatment for a light aircraft fuselage. J Aircr 24(9):660–665
Xin FX, Lu TJ (2009) Analytical and experimental investigation on transmission loss of clamped double panels: implication of boundary effects. J Acoust Soc Am 125(3): 1506–1517
Xin FX, Lu TJ, Chen CQ (2008) Vibroacoustic behavior of clamp mounted double-panel partition with enclosure air cavity. J Acoust Soc Am 124(6):3604–3612
Franco F, Cunefare KA, Ruzzene M (2007) Structural-acoustic optimization of sandwich panels. J Vib Acoust 129(3):330–340
Xin FX, Lu TJ, Chen CQ (2009) External mean flow influence on noise transmission through double-leaf aeroelastic plates. AIAA J 47(8):1939–1951
Xin FX, Lu TJ, Chen CQ (2009) Dynamic response and acoustic radiation of double-leaf metallic panel partition under sound excitation. Comput Mater Sci 46(3):728–732
Laulagnet B (1998) Sound radiation by a simply supported unbaffled plate. J Acoust Soc Am 103(5):2451–2462
Lomas NS, Hayek SI (1977) Vibration and acoustic radiation of elastically supported rectangular plates. J Sound Vib 52(1):1–25
Sewell EC (1970) Transmission of reverberant sound through a single-leaf partition surrounded by an infinite rigid baffle. J Sound Vib 12(1):21–32
London A (1950) Transmission of reverberant sound through double walls. J Acoust Soc Am 22(2):270–279
Antonio JMP, Tadeu A, Godinho L (2003) Analytical evaluation of the acoustic insulation provided by double infinite walls. J Sound Vib 263(1):113–129
Wang J, Lu TJ, Woodhouse J et al (2005) Sound transmission through lightweight double-leaf partitions: theoretical modelling. J Sound Vib 286(4–5):817–847
Kropp W, Rebillard E (1999) On the air-borne sound insulation of double wall constructions. Acta Acust Acust 85:707–720
Tadeu A, Pereira A, Godinho L et al (2007) Prediction of airborne sound and impact sound insulation provided by single and multilayer systems using analytical expressions. Appl Acoust 68(1):17–42
White PH, Powell A (1966) Transmission of random sound and vibration through a rectangular double wall. J Acoust Soc Am 40(4):821–832
Cummings A, Mulholland KA (1968) The transmission loss of finite sized double panels in a random incidence sound field. J Sound Vib 8(1):126–133
Villot M, Guigou C, Gagliardini L (2001) Predicting the acoustical radiation of finite size multi-layered structures by applying spatial windowing on infinite structures. J Sound Vib 245(3):433–455
Chazot JD, Guyader JL (2007) Prediction of transmission loss of double panels with a patch-mobility method. J Acoust Soc Am 121(1):267–278
Yairi M, Sakagami K, Sakagami E et al (2002) Sound radiation from a double-leaf elastic plate with a point force excitation: effect of an interior panel on the structure-borne sound radiation. Appl Acoust 63(7):737–757
Carneal JP, Fuller CR (2004) An analytical and experimental investigation of active structural acoustic control of noise transmission through double panel systems. J Sound Vib 272(3–5):749–771
Brunskog J (2005) The influence of finite cavities on the sound insulation of double-plate structures. J Acoust Soc Am 117(6):3727–3739
Beranek LL, Work GA (1949) Sound transmission through multiple structures containing flexible blankets. J Acoust Soc Am 21(4):419–428
Mulholland KA, Parbrook HD, Cummings A (1967) The transmission loss of double panels. J Sound Vib 6(3):324–334
Fahy F (1985) Sound and structural vibration: radiation, transmission and response. Academic, London
Bao C, Pan J (1997) Experimental study of different approaches for active control of sound transmission through double walls. J Acoust Soc Am 102(3):1664–1670
Carneal JP, Fuller CR (1995) Active structural acoustic control of noise transmission through double panel systems. AIAA J 33(4):618–623
Hongisto V (2000) Sound insulation of doors – Part 1: Prediction models for structural and leak transmission. J Sound Vib 230(1):133–148
Tadeu AJB, Mateus DMR (2001) Sound transmission through single, double and triple glazing. Experimental evaluation. Appl Acoust 62(3):307–325
Leppington FG, Broadbent EG, Butler GF (2006) Transmission of sound through a pair of rectangular elastic plates. Ima J Appl Math 71(6):940–955
Panneton R, Atalla N (1996) Numerical prediction of sound transmission through finite multilayer systems with poroelastic materials. J Acoust Soc Am 100(1):346–354
Mahjoob MJ, Mohammadi N, Malakooti S (2009) An investigation into the acoustic insulation of triple-layered panels containing Newtonian fluids: theory and experiment. Appl Acoust 70(1):165–171
Jones RE (1979) Intercomparisons of laboratory determinations of airborne sound transmission loss. J Acoust Soc Am 66(1):148–164
Toyoda M, Kugo H, Shimizu T et al (2008) Effects of an air-layer-subdivision technique on the sound transmission through a single plate. J Acoust Soc Am 123(2):825–831
Liu BL, Feng LP, Nilsson A (2007) Influence of overpressure on sound transmission through curved panels. J Sound Vib 302(4–5):760–776
Pellicier A, Trompette N (2007) A review of analytical methods, based on the wave approach, to compute partitions transmission loss. Appl Acoust 68(10):1192–1212
Cheng L, Li YY, Gao JX (2005) Energy transmission in a mechanically-linked double-wall structure coupled to an acoustic enclosure. J Acoust Soc Am 117(5):2742–2751
Lee JH, Kim J (2002) Analysis of sound transmission through periodically stiffened panels by space-harmonic expansion method. J Sound Vib 251(2):349–366
Maidanik G (1962) Response of ribbed panels to reverberant acoustic fields. J Acoust Soc Am 34(6):809–826
Ruzzene M (2004) Vibration and sound radiation of sandwich beams with honeycomb truss core. J Sound Vib 277(4–5):741–763
Liu B, Feng L, Nilsson A (2007) Sound transmission through curved aircraft panels with stringer and ring frame attachments. J Sound Vib 300(3–5):949–973
Takahashi D (1995) Effects of panel boundedness on sound transmission problems. J Acoust Soc Am 98(5):2598–2606
Lin G-F, Garrelick JM (1977) Sound transmission through periodically framed parallel plates. J Acoust Soc Am 61(4):1014–1018
Takahashi D (1983) Sound radiation from periodically connected double-plate structures. J Sound Vib 90(4):541–557
Xin FX, Lu TJ (2009) Effects of core topology on sound insulation performance of lightweight all-metallic sandwich panels. Mater Manuf Process 26(9):1213–1221
Brunskog J (2005) The influence of finite cavities on the sound insulation of double-plate structures. Acta Astronaut 117(6):3727–3739
Pan J, Bao C (1998) Analytical study of different approaches for active control of sound transmission through double walls. J Acoust Soc Am 103(4):1916–1922
Kim BK, Kang HJ, Kim JS et al (2004) Tunneling effect in sound transmission loss determination: theoretical approach. J Acoust Soc Am 115(5):2100–2109
Farag NH, Pan J (1998) Free and forced in-plane vibration of rectangular plates. J Acoust Soc Am 103(1):408–413
Bosmans I, Mees P, Vermeir G (1996) Structure-borne sound transmission between thin orthotropic plates: analytical solutions. J Sound Vib 191(1):75–90
Graham WR (2007) Analytical approximations for the modal acoustic impedances of simply supported, rectangular plates. J Acoust Soc Am 122(2):719–730
Utley WA, Fletcher BL (1973) The effect of edge conditions on the sound insulation of double windows. J Sound Vib 26(1):63–72
Hongisto V, Lindgren M, Keranen J (2001) Enhancing maximum measurable sound reduction index using sound intensity method and strong receiving room absorption. J Acoust Soc Am 109(1):254–265
ASTM E 90-04 (2004) Standard test method for laboratory measurement of airborne sound transmission loss of building partitions and elements
Guigou C, Li Z, Fuller CR (1996) The relationship between volume velocity and far-field radiated pressure of a planar structure. J Sound Vib 197(2):252–254
Leissa AW (1993) Vibrations of plates. Acoustical Society of America, New York
Leissa AW (1973) The free vibration of rectangular plates. J Sound Vib 31:257–293
Laura PAA, Grossi RO (1981) Transverse vibrations of rectangular plates with edges elastically restrained against translation and rotation. J Sound Vib 75(1):101–107
Xin FX, Lu TJ, Chen CQ (2010) Sound transmission through simply supported finite double-panel partitions with enclosed air cavity. J Vib Acoust 132(1):011008: 011001–011011
Xin FX, Lu TJ (2010) Analytical modeling of sound transmission across finite aeroelastic panels in convected fluids. J Acoust Soc Am 128(3):1097–1107
Xin FX, Lu TJ (2011) Transmission loss of orthogonally rib-stiffened double-panel structures with cavity absorption. J Acoust Soc Am 129(4):1919–1934
Xin FX, Lu TJ (2011) Analytical modeling of wave propagation in orthogonally rib-stiffened sandwich structures: sound radiation. Comput Struct 89(5–6):507–516
Langley RS, Smith JRD, Fahy FJ (1997) Statistical energy analysis of periodically stiffened damped plate structures. J Sound Vib 208(3):407–426
Xin FX, Lu TJ (2010) Sound radiation of orthogonally rib-stiffened sandwich structures with cavity absorption. Compos Sci Technol 70(15):2198–2206
Xin FX, Lu TJ (2010) Analytical modeling of fluid loaded orthogonally rib-stiffened sandwich structures: sound transmission. J Mech Phys Solids 58(9):1374–1396
Gardonio P, Elliott SJ (1999) Active control of structure-borne and airborne sound transmission through double panel. J Aircr 36(6):1023–1032
Kaiser OE, Pietrzko SJ, Morari M (2003) Feedback control of sound transmission through a double glazed window. J Sound Vib 263(4):775–795
Gardonio P (2002) Review of active techniques for aerospace vibro-acoustic control. J Aircr 39(2):206–214
Sas P, Bao C, Augusztinovicz F et al (1995) Active control of sound transmission through a double panel partition. J Sound Vib 180(4):609–625
Mulholland KA, Price AJ, Parbrook HD (1968) Transmission loss of multiple panels in a random incidence field. J Acoust Soc Am 43(6):1432–1435
Yairi M, Sakagami K, Morimoto M et al (2003) Effect of acoustical damping with a porous absorptive layer in the cavity to reduce the structure-borne sound radiation from a double-leaf structure. Appl Acoust 64(4):365–384
Del Coz Diaz JJ, Alvarez Rabanal FP, Garcia Nieto PJ et al (2010) Sound transmission loss analysis through a multilayer lightweight concrete hollow brick wall by FEM and experimental validation. Build Environ 45(11):2373–2386
Sgard FC, Atalla N, Nicolas J (2000) A numerical model for the low frequency diffuse field sound transmission loss of double-wall sound barriers with elastic porous linings. J Acoust Soc Am 108(6):2865–2872
Price AJ, Crocker MJ (1970) Sound transmission through double panels using statistical energy analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 47(3A):683–693
Craik RJM (2003) Non-resonant sound transmission through double walls using statistical energy analysis. Appl Acoust 64(3):325–341
Fahy FJ (1994) Statistical energy analysis: a critical overview. Philos Trans Phys Sci Eng 346(1681):431–447
Vinokur RY (1990) Transmission loss of triple partitions at low frequencies. Appl Acoust 29(1):15–24
Brekke A (1981) Calculation methods for the transmission loss of single, double and triple partitions. Appl Acoust 14(3):225–240
Taylor RL, Govindjee S (2004) Solution of clamped rectangular plate problems. Commun Numer Methods Eng 20(10):757–765
Ingard U (1959) Influence of fluid motion past a plane boundary on sound reflection, absorption, and transmission. J Acoust Soc Am 31(7):1035–1036
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
1.1.1 Appendix A
The deflection coefficients of the two panels are
The left-hand side of Eq. (1.74) represents the generalized force, where
Using the definition of the sub-matrices presented above, one obtains
1.1.2 Appendix B
The modal coefficients of the three panels are
The generalized forces can be written in vector form as
In the context of the above sub-matrices, the elemental matrices can be derived as
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Science Press Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lu, T., Xin, F. (2014). Transmission of Sound Through Finite Multiple-Panel Partition. In: Vibro-Acoustics of Lightweight Sandwich Structures. Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55358-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55358-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55357-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55358-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)