Abstract
This paper took GEM companies listed between 2009 and 2011 as example and used 2SLS method to analyze the relation between venture capital institutions and corporate innovation behavior. We found that venture capital institutions generally have no significant effect on GEM companies, while state-owned venture capital institutions are conductive to improvement of enterprise innovation behavior. Besides, if state-owned and non-state venture capital institutions invest in an enterprise at the same time, share holding of venture capital tend to decrease. Thus, the government should invest more to venture capital as well as support the development of private enterprise and foreign venture capital.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amit R, Brander J, Zott C (1998) Why do venture capital firms exist? theory and Canadian evidence. J Bus Ventur 13:441–466
Bank EI (2001) Financing innovative firms through venture capital. http://www.eib.org/pub/pub.htm
Engel D, Keilbach M (2002) Firm level implications of early stage venture capital investment: an empirical investigation. J Empirical Finance 14:150–167 (ZEW Discussion Paper 02:82)
Guo R (2009) Enterprises technology innovation model reform driven by investment mechanism. J Beijing Norm Univ (Soc Sci) 5:136–141
Henry C (2004) Managing open innovation: chess and poker. Res Technol Manag 47:23–26
Kochar R, David P (1996) Institutional investors and firm innovation: a test of competing hypotheses. Strateg Manag J 17:73–84
Kortum S, Lerner J (2000) Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. Rand J Econ 31:674–692
Lerner J (2000) Boom and bust in the venture capital industry and the impact on innovation. Econ Rev Q4:25–39
Liu W, Chen J, Li X (2013) A study on technology innovation’s efficiency of regional high-tech industries in China. Econ Theor Econ Manag 1:36–50
Long Y, Shi P (2012) The impact of venture capital on high-tech firms’ technology innovation effects. Res Econ Manag 87:38–44
Peneder M (2008) The problem of private under-investment in innovation: a policy mind map. Tech-innovation 3:313–341
Timmons J, Bygrave W (1992) Venture capital’s role in financing innovation for economic growth. J Bus Ventur 23:161–176
Tykvova T (2000) Venture capital in germany and its impact on innovation. Technical report http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=235512
Wan K, Yuan L (2006) The empirical analysis of the relationship between venture capital and technology innovation. Ind Eng Manag 1:72–76
Yang Y, Shao T (2012) Venture capital and reginal innovation’s empirical study based on panel data. Manag Rev 6:56–62
Zhao H, Xia H (2009) An empirical study on relationship between the stock holding of institutional investors and companies innovation activity. China Soft Sci 5:33–39
Zucker L, Darby M, Brewer M (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Am Econ Rev 88:290–306
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Fund of China (71072066) and the Fund of Sichuan University (SKQY201225, 2013JCPT006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cao, Q., Zhou, Q., Tang, Y. (2014). Venture Capital and Entrepreneurial Innovation: Research on the Data of GEM in China. In: Xu, J., Cruz-Machado, V., Lev, B., Nickel, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 280. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55182-6_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55182-6_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55181-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55182-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)