Abstract
With the knowledge that cement-retained restorative options for treating implant sites may increase the risk for disease, screw-retained solutions are being considered. Dealing with the screw access channel esthetics and ability to control occlusal force has been considered the primary motivation for the use of cement-retained implant restorations. The implant crown with an esthetic plug was published to offer a solution to this problem. Using currently available materials, any dental laboratory capable of pressing ceramic porcelains can use this design and improve both the esthetics and occlusal contacting site. The cement-screw restoration is described as another alternative. This takes advantage of extraoral cementation of the restoration onto the abutment, which negates the problem of pushing cement down into the vulnerable soft tissues, and then using the screw(s) to lock the crown or bridge to the implant body.
Where esthetic demands are high and the screw channel angulation an issue, using supragingival margins that allow for ceramic to ceramic bonding is described in the implant crown with an esthetic adhesive margin section. This design uses porcelains that are bonded and matched producing a highly effective result.
Implant companies are also developing new abutment designs to further promote the use of screw-retained restorations. Using novel screwdrivers and funneling the screw around angle changes appear to be a promising solution for the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:43–7.
Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:552–62.
Christensen GJ. Margin fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent. 1966;16:297–305.
Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:112–4.
Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, Reissner MW. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:943–6.
Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:28–35.
Hinds KF. Custom impression coping for an exact registration of the healed tissue in the esthetic implant restoration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17(6):584–91.
Jemt T. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10 year comparative follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:303–10.
Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Morimoto T, Lozada J. Facial gingival tissue stability after connective tissue graft with single immediate tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: consecutive case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(11 Suppl):40–8.
Kano SC, Binon P, Bonfante G, Curtis DA. Effect of casting procedures on screw loosening in UCLA-type abutments. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:1–5.
Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1379–84.
Magne P, Magne M, Jovanovic SA. An esthetic solution for single-implant restorations—type III porcelain veneer bonded to a screw-retained custom abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:2–7.
Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:719–28.
Moráguez OD, Belser UC. The use of polytetrafluoroethylene tape for the management of screw access channels in implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:189–91.
Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:1102–7.
Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(6):865–8.
Rajan M, Gunaseelan R. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained implant prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:578–80.
Schwedhelm ER, Lepe X, Aw TC. A crown venting technique for the cementation of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:89–90.
Taylor TD, Agar JR. Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:89–95.
Theoharidou A, Petridis HP, Tzannas K, Garefis P. Abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:681–90.
Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A. Technique for controlling the cement for an implant crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102:57–8.
Wadhwani C, Hess T, Faber T, Piñeyro A, Chen CS. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:295–302.
Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A, Avots J. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23:138–43.
Wadhwani CP, Piñeyro A, Akimoto K. An introduction to the implant crown with an esthetic adhesive margin (ICEAM). J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(4):246–54.
Weber HP, Kim DM, Ng MW, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP. Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: a multi-center, 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:375–9.
Wilson TG. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1388–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wadhwani, C.P.K., Linkevičius, T. (2015). Restorative Options That Eliminate or Reduce the Potential for Cement-Induced Peri-implant Disease. In: Wadhwani, C. (eds) Cementation in Dental Implantology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55163-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55163-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55162-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55163-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)