Touching Virtual Agents: Embodiment and Mind

  • Gijs Huisman
  • Merijn Bruijnes
  • Jan Kolkmeier
  • Merel Jung
  • Aduén Darriba Frederiks
  • Yves Rybarczyk
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 425)

Abstract

In this paper we outline the design and development of an embodied conversational agent setup that incorporates an augmented reality screen and tactile sleeve. With this setup the agent can visually and physically touch the user. We provide a literature overview of embodied conversational agents, as well as haptic technologies, and argue for the importance of adding touch to an embodied conversational agent. Finally, we provide guidelines for studies involving the touching virtual agent (TVA) setup.

Keywords

Embodied conversational agent Touching virtual agent Simulated social touch Haptic feedback Augmented reality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N.: Virtual interpersonal touch: Haptic interaction and copresence in collaborative virtual environments. Multimedia Tools and Applications 37(1), 5–14 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailenson, J., Yee, N., Brave, S., Merget, D., Koslow, D.: Virtual interpersonal touch: Expressing and recognizing emotions through haptic devices. Human-Computer Interaction 22(3), 325–353 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, C., Kopp, S., Wachsmuth, I.: Why Emotions Should be Integrated into Conversational Agents. Engineering Approaches to Conversational Informatics, pp. 49–68. John Wiley & Sons (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bickmore, T.W., Fernando, R., Ring, L., Schulman, D.: Empathic Touch by Relational Agents. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1(1), 60–71 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Björnsdotter, M., Morrison, I., Olausson, H.: Feeling good: on the role of C fiber mediated touch in interoception. Experimental Brain Research 207(3-4), 149–155 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Botvinick, M., Cohen, J.: Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669), 756 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bourdin, P., Sanahuja, J.M.T., Moya, C.C., Haggard, P., Slater, M.: Persuading people in a remote destination to sing by beaming there. In: VRST 2013, pp. 123–132. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brave, S., Dahley, A.: inTouch: A medium for haptic interpersonal communication. In: Proceedings of CHI 1997, pp. 363–364. ACM (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bruijnes, M.: Affective conversational models: Interpersonal stance in a police interview context. In: Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ASCII 2013, pp. 624–629. IEEE Computer Society, USA (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruijnes, M., Kolkmeier, J., op den Akker, R., Linssen, J., Theune, M., Heylen, D.: Keeping up stories: Design considerations for a police interview training game. In: Social Believability in Games Workshop at ACE 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burgoon, J.K., Walther, J.B., Baesler, E.J.: Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research 19(2), 237–263 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camps, J., Tuteleers, C., Stouten, J., Nelissen, J.: A situational touch: How touch affects people’s decision behavior. Social Influence 8(4), 237–250 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cassell, J.: Embodied conversational agents. The MIT Press (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang, A., O’Modhrain, S., Jacob, R., Gunther, E., Ishii, H.: Comtouch: Design of a vibrotactile communication device. In: Proceedings of DIS 2002, pp. 312–320. ACM (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chellali, A., Dumas, C., Milleville-Pennel, I.: Influences of haptic communication on a shared manual task. Interacting with Computers 23(4), 317–328 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E.: Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition 13, 127–149 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cramer, H., Kemper, N., Amin, A., Wielinga, B., Evers, V.: Give me a hug: The effects of touch and autonomy on people’s responses to embodied social agents. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 20(2-3), 437–445 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ditzen, B., Neumann, I.D., Bodenmann, G., von Dawans, B., Turner, R.A., Ehlert, U., Heinrichs, M.: Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 32(5), 565–574 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drescher, V.M., Gantt, W.H., Whitehead, W.E.: Heart rate response to touch. Psychosomatic Medicine 42(6), 559–565 (1980)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eaton, M., Mitchell-bonair, I.L., Friedmann, E.: The effect of touch on nutritional intake of chronic organic brain syndrome patients. Journal of Gerontology 41(5), 611–616 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fasel, B., Luettin, J.: Automatic facial expression analysis: A survey. Pattern Recognition 36(1), 259–275 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Field, T.: Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review. Developmental Review 30(4), 367–383 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Field, T., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M.: Massage therapy research. Developmental Review 27(1), 75–89 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Floyd, K.: All touches are not created equal: Effects of form and duration on observers’ interpretations of an embrace. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 23(4), 283–299 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3), 143–166 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Foss-Feig, J.H., Heacock, J.L., Cascio, C.J.: Tactile responsiveness patterns and their association with core features in autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 6(1), 337–344 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gallace, A., Spence, C.: The cognitive and neural correlates of “tactile consciousness”: A multisensory perspective. Consciousness and Cognition 17(1), 370–407 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gallace, A., Spence, C.: The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 34(2), 246–259 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gallace, A., Tan, H.Z., Spence, C.: The Body Surface as a Communication System: The State of the Art after 50 Years. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16(6), 655–676 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giannopoulos, E., Eslava, V., Oyarzabal, M., Hierro, T., González, L., Ferre, M., Slater, M.: The effect of haptic feedback on basic social interaction within shared virtual environments. In: Ferre, M. (ed.) EuroHaptics 2008. LNCS, vol. 5024, pp. 301–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guéguen, N.: Nonverbal encouragement of participation in a course: The effect of touching. Social Psychology of Education 7(1), 89–98 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guéguen, N., Afifi, F., Brault, S., Charles-Sire, V., Leforestier, P.M., Morzedec, A., Piron, E.: Failure of Tactile Contact to Increase Request Compliance: The Case of Blood Donation Behavior. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis 8(1), 1–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guéguen, N., Fischer-lokou, J.: Tactile contact and spontaneous help: An evaluation in a natural setting. The Journal of Social Psychology 143(6), 785–787 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guéguen, N., Jacob, C.: The effect of touch on tipping: An evaluation in a french bar. International Journal of Hospitality Management 24(2), 295–299 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., Boulbry, G.: The effect of touch on compliance with a restaurant’s employee suggestion. International Journal of Hospitality Management 26(4), 1019–1023 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Guéguen, N., Meineri, S., Charles-Sire, V.: Improving medication adherence by using practitioner nonverbal techniques: A field experiment on the effect of touch. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 33(6), 466–473 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haans, A., IJsselsteijn, W.: Mediated social touch: A review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality 9(2-3), 149–159 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haans, A., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: The Virtual Midas Touch: Helping Behavior After a Mediated Social Touch. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2(3), 136–140 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haans, A., de Nood, C., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: Investigating response similarities between real and mediated social touch: A first test. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007, pp. 2405–2410. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hartholt, A., Traum, D., Marsella, S.C., Shapiro, A., Stratou, G., Leuski, A., Morency, L.-P., Gratch, J.: All together now. In: Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., Shimodaira, H. (eds.) IVA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8108, pp. 368–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Henricson, M., Ersson, A., Määttä, S., Segesten, K., Berglund, A.L.: The outcome of tactile touch on stress parameters in intensive care: A randomized controlled trial. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 14(4), 244–254 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hertenstein, M.J., Holmes, R., McCullough, M., Keltner, D.: The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion 9(4), 566–573 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hertenstein, M.J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B.A., Jaskolka, A.R.: Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion 6(3), 528–533 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hertenstein, M.J., Verkamp, J.M., Kerestes, A.M., Holmes, R.M.: The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 132(1), 5–94 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hertenstein, M., Keltner, D.: Gender and the communication of emotion via touch. Sex Roles 64(1-2), 70–80 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Heslin, R., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, M.: Meaning of touch: The case of touch from a stranger or same sex person. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 7(3), 147–157 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Heylen, D., op den Akker, R., ter Maat, M., Petta, P., Rank, S., Reidsma, D., Zwiers, J.: On the nature of engineering social artificial companions. Applied Artificial Intelligence 25(6), 549–574 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Huisman, G.: A touch of affect: Mediated social touch and affect. In: ICMI 2012, pp. 317–320. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Huisman, G., Darriba Frederiks, A., Van Dijk, E., Heylen, D., Kröse, B.: The TaSST: Tactile Sleeve for Social Touch. In: Proceedings of WHC 2013, pp. 211–216. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Huisman, G., Darriba Frederiks, A.: Towards tactile expressions of emotion through mediated touch. In: CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2013, pp. 1575–1580. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Johnson, K.O.: The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11(4), 455–461 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jones, S.E., Yarbrough, A.E.: A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch. Communication Monographs 52(1), 19–56 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jung, M., Boensma, R., Huisman, G., Van Dijk, E.: Touched by the storyteller: the influence of remote touch in the context of storytelling. In: Proceedings of ACII 2013, pp. 792–797. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Khan, R., De Angeli, A.: Mapping the demographics of virtual humans. In: Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... But Not as We Know It, vol. 2, pp. 149–152. British Computer Society (2007)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Klaassen, R., op den Akker, H., Lavrysen, T., van Wissen, S.: User preferences for multi-device context-aware feedback in a digital coaching system. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 21 (2013)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kleinke, C.L.: Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13(3), 218–223 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    de Kok, I., Heylen, D.: Integrating backchannel prediction models into embodied conversational agents. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7502, pp. 268–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kopp, S., Gesellensetter, L., Krämer, N.C., Wachsmuth, I.: A conversational agent as museum guide–design and evaluation of a real-world application. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 329–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kutner, J.S., Smith, M.C., Corbin, L., Hemphill, L., Benton, K., Mellis, B.K., Beaty, B., Felton, S., Yamashita, T.E., Bryant, L.L., Fairclough, D.L.: Massage therapy versus simple touch to improve pain and mood in patients with advanced cancera randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 149(6), 369–379 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Larsson, S., Traum, D.R.: Information state and dialogue management in the trindi dialogue move engine toolkit. Natural Language Engineering 6(3&4), 323–340 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Leary, T.: Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality: Functional Theory and Methodology for Personality Evaluation. Ronald Press, New York (1957)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Liu, Q., Vrontou, S., Rice, F.L., Zylka, M.J., Dong, X., Anderson, D.J.: Molecular genetic visualization of a rare subset of unmyelinated sensory neurons that may detect gentle touch. Nature Neuroscience 10(8), 946–948 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Löken, L.S., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., Olausson, H.: Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nature Neuroscience 12(5), 547–548 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Loomis, J.M., Lederman, S.J.: Tactual perception. In: Boff, K., Kaufman, L., Thomas, J. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Cognitive Processes and Performances, vol. 2, ch. 31, pp. 1–41. Wiley, NY (1986)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lowe, D.G.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: The Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 1150–1157. IEEE (1999)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Maselli, A., Slater, M.: The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7(83) (2013)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    McDaniel, E., Andersen, P.: International patterns of interpersonal tactile communication: A field study. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 22(1), 59–75 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    de Melo, C.M., Zheng, L., Gratch, J.: Expression of moral emotions in cooperating agents. In: Ruttkay, Z., Kipp, M., Nijholt, A., Vilhjálmsson, H.H. (eds.) IVA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5773, pp. 301–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Morrison, I., Björnsdotter, M., Olausson, H.: Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds. The Journal of Neuroscience 31(26), 9554–9562 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Morrison, I., Löken, L., Olausson, H.: The skin as a social organ. Experimental Brain Research 204, 305–314 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mueller, F.F., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M.R., Kjeldskov, J., Pedell, S., Howard, S.: Hug over a distance. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005, pp. 1673–1676. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Nakagawa, K., Shiomi, M., Shinozawa, K., Matsumura, R., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Effect of robot’s active touch on people’s motivation. In: HRI 2011, pp. 465–472. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nannberg, J.C., Hansen, C.H.: Post-compliance touch: An incentive for task performance. The Journal of Social Psychology 134(3), 301–307 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Nguyen, N., Wachsmuth, I., Kopp, S.: Touch perception and emotional appraisal for a virtual agent. In: Proceedings Workshop Emotion and Computing-Current Research and Future Impact, KI, pp. 17–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Nygaard, L.C., Queen, J.S.: Communicating emotion: Linking affective prosody and word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34(4), 1017 (2008)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Olausson, H.K., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., Vallbo, A.: The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 34(2), 185–191 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Park, Y.W., Nam, T.J.: Poke: A new way of sharing emotional touches during phone conversations. In: CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2013, pp. 2859–2860. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Patterson, M.L., Powell, J.L., Lenihan, M.G.: Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 10(1), 41–50 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Paulsell, S., Goldman, M.: The effect of touching different body areas on prosocial behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology 122(2), 269–273 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Poppe, R.: A survey on vision-based human action recognition. Image and Vision Computing 28(6), 976–990 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Premack, D., Woodruff, G.: Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(04), 515–526 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Rabiner, L.R.: A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(2), 257–286 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. CSLI Publications (2002)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rossen, B., Lok, B.: A crowdsourcing method to develop virtual human conversational agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70(4), 301–319 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sallnäs, E.-L.: Haptic feedback increases perceived social presence. In: Kappers, A.M.L., van Erp, J.B.F., Bergmann Tiest, W.M., van der Helm, F.C.T. (eds.) EuroHaptics 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6192, pp. 178–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sallnäs, E.L., Rassmus-Gröhn, K., Sjöström, C.: Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7(4), 461–476 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Schlangen, D., Skantze, G.: A general, abstract model of incremental dialogue processing. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 710–718. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Smith, J., MacLean, K.: Communicating emotion through a haptic link: Design space and methodology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(4), 376–387 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Stiehl, W.D., Breazeal, C.: Affective touch for robotic companions. In: Tao, J., Tan, T., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2005. LNCS, vol. 3784, pp. 747–754. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Teh, J.K.S., Cheok, A.D., Peiris, R.L., Choi, Y., Thuong, V., Lai, S.: Huggy pajama: A mobile parent and child hugging communication system. In: IDC 2008, pp. 250–257. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Truong, K.P., Heylen, D.: Disambiguating the functions of conversational sounds with prosody: The case of‘yeah’ (2010)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Turk, M.A., Pentland, A.P.: Face recognition using eigenfaces. In: Proceedings CVPR 1991, pp. 586–591. IEEE (1991)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Urbain, J., Niewiadomski, R., Hofmann, J., Bantegnie, E., Baur, T., Berthouze, N., Cakmak, H., Cruz, R.T., Dupont, S., Geist, M., et al.: Laugh machine. Proceedings eNTERFACE 12, 13–34 (2013)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wang, R., Quek, F., Tatar, D., Teh, K.S., Cheok, A.: Keep in touch: Channel, expectation and experience. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012, pp. 139–148. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Weizenbaum, J., McCarthy, J.: Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. Physics Today 30, 68 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    van Welbergen, H., Reidsma, D., Kopp, S.: An incremental multimodal realizer for behavior co-articulation and coordination. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7502, pp. 175–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Whitcher, S.J., Fisher, J.D.: Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(1), 87–96 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Willis, F.N., Hamm, H.K.: The use of interpersonal touch in securing compliance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 5(1), 49–55 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gijs Huisman
    • 1
  • Merijn Bruijnes
    • 1
  • Jan Kolkmeier
    • 1
  • Merel Jung
    • 1
  • Aduén Darriba Frederiks
    • 2
  • Yves Rybarczyk
    • 3
  1. 1.Human Media Interaction GroupUniversity of TwenteNetherlands
  2. 2.Digital Life CentreAmsterdam University of Applied SciencesNetherlands
  3. 3.New University of LisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations