Abstract
The need for medical research involving critically ill patients with severe neurosurgical conditions is self-evident. Clinical trials in emergency and critical care settings frequently involve patients with acute catastrophic cerebral conditions causing loss of decision-making capacity and facing very short time frames. Examples of such conditions are severe traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. All clinical trials are subject to the ethical and juridical principles of good clinical practice and international and national guidelines and regulations. The most important ethical principle underlying clinical trials is the respect for autonomy. Furthermore, protection against discomfort, harm, risk, and exploitation and the prospect of potential benefit are essential.
In this chapter the ethical dimensions of consent for clinical trials in severely incapacitated individuals are discussed with focus on different models of surrogate or proxy consent. This chapter has some overlap with Chaps. 5 and 16.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ågård A, Hermerén G, Herlitz J (2001) Patients’ experiences of intervention trials on the treatment of myocardial infarction: is it time to adjust the informed consent procedure to the patient’s capacity? Heart 86:632–637
Alves WM (2006) Ethical considerations in neuroemergency clinical trials. In: Alves WM, Skolnick BE (eds) Handbook of neuroemergency clinical trials. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 257–273
Bateman BT, Meyers PM, Schumacher HC et al (2003) Conducting stroke research with an exception from the requirement for informed consent. Stroke 34:1317–1323
Ciccone A (2003) Consent to thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: from trial to practice. Lancet Neurol 2:375–378
Ciroldi M, Cariou A, Adrie C et al (2007) Ability of family members to predict patient’s consent to critical care research. Intensive Care Med 33:807–813
Clifton GL, Knudson P, McDonald M (2002) Waiver of consent in studies of acute brain injury. J Neurotrauma 19:1121–1126
Coppolino M, Ackerson L (2001) Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? Chest 119:603–612
Ditto PH, Danks JH, Smucker WD et al (2001) Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 161:421–430
European Commission (2001) Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Off J European Comm L 121:34–44
European Commission (2012) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC. http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/clinicaltrials/2012_07/proposal/2012_07_proposal_en.pdf
Gamble C, Woolfall K, Williamson P et al (2013) New European Union regulation of clinical trials is conflicting on deferred consent in emergency situations. BMJ 346:f667
Hartmann M (2012) Impact assessment of the European Clinical Trials Directive: a longitudinal, prospective, observational study analyzing patterns and trends in clinical drug trials applications submitted since 2001 to regulatory agencies in six EU countries. Trials 13(53):1–10
Hsieh M, Dailey MW, Calloway CW (2001) Surrogate consent by family members for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research. Acad Emerg Med 8:851–853
Jansen TC, Kompanje EJO, Bakker J et al (2007) Deferred consent in emergency intensive care research: what if the patient dies early? Use the data or not? Intensive Care Med 33:894–900
Jansen TC, Kompanje EJO, Bakker J (2009) Deferred consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible. Crit Care Med 37(Suppl):S65–S68
Kane I, Lindley R, Lewis S et al (2005) Impact of stroke syndrome and stroke severity on the process of consent in the third international stroke trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 21:348–352
Kompanje EJO, Maas AIR, Hilhorst MT et al (2005) Ethical considerations on consent procedures for emergency research in severe and moderate traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:633–640
Kompanje EJO, Maas AIR, Slieker FJA et al (2007) Ethical implications of time frames in a randomized controlled trial in acute severe traumatic brain injury. Prog Brain Res 161:243–250
Kucia AM, Horowitz JD (2000) Is informed consent to clinical trials an ‘upside selective’ process in acute coronary syndromes? Am Heart J 139:94–97
Liddell K, Kompanje EJO, Lemaire F et al (2006) Recommendations in relation to the EU Clinical Trials Directive and medical research involving incapacitated adults. Wien Klin Wochenschr 118:183–191
Mason S, Barrow H, Phillips A et al (2006) Brief report on the experience of using proxy consent for incapacitated adults. J Med Ethics 32:61–62
Matei M, Kompanje EJO, Maas AIR et al (2013) Clinical research into the ICU: clouds at the horizon, once again. Intensive Care Med 39:1479–1480
Matheis-Kraft C, Roberto KA (1997) Influence of a values discussion on congruence between elderly women and their families on critical health care decisions. J Women Aging 9:5–22
Newman JT, Smart A, Reese TR et al (2012) Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research. Crit Care Med 40:2590–2594
Perkins GD, Bossaert L, Nolan J et al (2013) Proposed revisions to the EU clinical trials directive – comments from the European Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation 84:263–264
Roupie E, Santin A, Boulme R et al (2000) Patient’s preferences concerning medical information and surgery: results of a prospective study in a French emergency department. Intensive Care Med 26:52–56
Shalowitz DI, Garett-Mayer E, Wendler D (2006) The accuracy of surrogate decision makers. Arch Intern Med 166:493–497
Sugarman J (2000) Is the emperor really wearing new clothes? Informed consent for acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 140:2–3
Sulmasy DP, Haller K, Terry PB (1994) More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med 96:432–438
Woolley N (1990) Crisis theory: a paradigm of effective intervention with families of critically ill people. J Adv Nurs 15:1402–1408
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kompanje, E.J.O., Bernstein, M. (2014). Consent in Emergency Clinical Research. In: Ammar, A., Bernstein, M. (eds) Neurosurgical Ethics in Practice: Value-based Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54980-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54980-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54979-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54980-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)