Skip to main content

Acknowledging Discourse Function for Sentiment Analysis

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8404))

Abstract

In this paper, we observe the effects that discourse function attribute to the task of training learned classifiers for sentiment analysis. Experimental results from our study show that training on a corpus of primarily persuasive documents can have a negative effect on the performance of supervised sentiment classification. In addition we demonstrate that through use of the Multinomial Naïve Bayes classifier we can minimise the detrimental effects of discourse function during sentiment analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity. Handbook of Natural Language Processing 2, 568 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kinneavy, J.E.: The Basic Aims of Discourse. College Composition and Communication 20, 297–304 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinneavy, J.L.: A Theory of Discourse: The Aims of Discourse. Norton (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shannon, C.E.: A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal 27, 379–423 (1948)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, P., Lee, M.: A CCG-based Approach to Fine-Grained Sentiment Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Sentiment Analysis where AI meets Psychology, The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee, pp. 3–16 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mullen, T., Collier, N.: Sentiment Analysis using Support Vector Machines with Diverse Information Sources. In: Lin, D., Wu, D. (eds.) Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pp. 412–418. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bloom, K., Garg, N., Argamon, S.: Extracting Appraisal Expressions. In: Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 308–315 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dermouche, M., Khouas, L., Velcin, J., Loudcher, S.: AMI&ERIC: How to Learn with Naive Bayes and Prior Knowledge: An Application to Sentiment Analysis. In: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2013), vol. 2, pp. 364–368. Association for Computational Linguistics (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, G.R.: 1. In: The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, pp.3–17. Sage (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hunston, S.: Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Routledge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, P., Lee, M.: Cross-discourse Development of Supervised Sentiment Analysis in the Clinical Domain. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop in Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, pp. 79–83. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bird, S., Loper, E., Klein, E.: Natural Language Processing with Python. O’Reilly Media Inc. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guerini, M., Strapparava, C., Stock, O.: Resources for Persuasion. In: Proceedings of LREC 2008, European Language Resources Association, pp. 235–242 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Greene, S., Resnik, P.: More than Words: Syntactic Packaging and Implicit Sentiment. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 503–511. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCallum, A., Nigam, K., et al.: A Comparison of Event Models for Naive Bayes Text Classification. In: AAAI 1998 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, vol. 752, pp. 41–48. AAAI (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smith, P., Lee, M. (2014). Acknowledging Discourse Function for Sentiment Analysis. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54903-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54903-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54902-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54903-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics